User reviews

I heavily compare to this to The Blair Witch (1999), not because it's found footage as I watch a vast amount of these but for a number of reasons.

The whole structure from the premise, to the interviews to the going into the woods to the losing the map. It all reeks of Blair Witch, only with a Bigfoot.

Also alike The Blair Witch very little actually happens and at no point do you see the antagonist.

So we have 3 documentary filmmakers given a grant to research Bigfoot, after conducting interviews with folks who claim to have seen it then venture into the forests of Utah to try and capture it on film. Surprisingly enough it doesn't go very well for them.

Bigfoot At Millcreek has not one but two sequels in production as we speak and this interests me. Let me be clear this is a bad film, but because of it's lack of content I'm just curious where they are going to go with it and how they can make another 2 movies from this?

If you don't like found footage films you won't like this, if however you do like found footage films you erm.......still won't like this.

Not the worst but still pretty damn bad.

The Good:

Well enough made

The Bad:

Very boring

Heavily recycled

Ultimately nothing happens

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

Dogs are commonly mistaken for 9ft Bigfoot

Do not, I repeat do not waste your time on this. You're better off sitting on the TV and watching the couch. I have nothing else to say about this gigantic pile of Bigfoot dung, but I'm supposed to have at least five lines of text as a minimum review. Watch "Phoenix Forgotten" instead, its Good Fellas compared to this road apple.

Great cast, great story, great film. Well done to everyone!