IMDb RATING
6.8/10
2.4K
YOUR RATING
A betting castle staff, and a series of misunderstandings and set-ups, leads to an American entertainer and an English damsel falling in love.A betting castle staff, and a series of misunderstandings and set-ups, leads to an American entertainer and an English damsel falling in love.A betting castle staff, and a series of misunderstandings and set-ups, leads to an American entertainer and an English damsel falling in love.
- Won 1 Oscar
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
Pearl Amatore
- Madrigal Singer
- (uncredited)
Dorothy Barrett
- Dancer in Funhouse Number
- (uncredited)
May Beatty
- Landlady
- (uncredited)
Eugene Beday
- Bit Role
- (uncredited)
Charles Bennett
- Carnival Barker
- (uncredited)
Frank Benson
- Attendant
- (uncredited)
John Blood
- Bit Role
- (uncredited)
Angela Blue
- Dancer
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Fred Astaire learned that Gracie Allen was nervous about dancing with him on-stage, he reportedly made a point of tripping and falling in front of her the first day on the set to put her at her ease.
- GoofsThis movie is based in England where vehicles drive on the left, but all the vehicles are left-hand drive, which obviously is what side they drive on in the US.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Hollywood and the Stars: The Fabulous Musicals (1963)
- SoundtracksI Can't Be Bothered Now
(1937) (uncredited)
Words by Ira Gershwin
Music by George Gershwin
Song and dance performed by Fred Astaire
Featured review
Back when musicals weren't showcases for choreographers, we had wonderful movies such as this one.
Being a big fan of both Wodehouse and Fred Astaire I was delighted to finally see this movie. Not quite a blend of Wodehouse and Hollywood, but close enough. Some of the American vaudeville humour, the slapstick not the witty banter, clash with Wodehouse's British sense of humour. But on the whole, the American style banter makes the American characters seem real rather than cardboard caricatures.
Some inventive staging for the dance numbers, including the wonderful fairground with revolving floors and funhouse mirrors, more than make up for the lack of a Busby Berkley over the top dance number. They seem a lot more realistic, if you could ever imagine people starting to sing and dance as realistic.
The lack of Ginger Rogers and Eric Blore don't hurt the movie, instead they allow different character dynamics to emerge. It's also nice not to have a wise cracking, headstrong love interest. Instead we have a gentle headstrong love interest, far more in keeping with Wodehouses' young aristocratic females.
Being a big fan of both Wodehouse and Fred Astaire I was delighted to finally see this movie. Not quite a blend of Wodehouse and Hollywood, but close enough. Some of the American vaudeville humour, the slapstick not the witty banter, clash with Wodehouse's British sense of humour. But on the whole, the American style banter makes the American characters seem real rather than cardboard caricatures.
Some inventive staging for the dance numbers, including the wonderful fairground with revolving floors and funhouse mirrors, more than make up for the lack of a Busby Berkley over the top dance number. They seem a lot more realistic, if you could ever imagine people starting to sing and dance as realistic.
The lack of Ginger Rogers and Eric Blore don't hurt the movie, instead they allow different character dynamics to emerge. It's also nice not to have a wise cracking, headstrong love interest. Instead we have a gentle headstrong love interest, far more in keeping with Wodehouses' young aristocratic females.
- darkbhudda
- Dec 31, 2005
- Permalink
- How long is A Damsel in Distress?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $1,035,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 41 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content