9 reviews
"Strictly Unconventional" is a heavily abbreviated version of a W. Sommerset Maugham play. I say heavily abbreviated because the film was originally 72 minutes but after its debut, MGM hacked 17 minutes off the movie. This truncated version is the only one now available and because it was hacked to pieces, I much prefer the 1925 silent version.
When the story begins, you see that Elizabeth is married to an incredibly dull man, Arnold. But she has a surprise for him...she's invited Arnold's mother and her husband to stay with them. This is a huge surprise because Arnold's mother left him and her husband many years ago....and they've had no interaction since! Now the wife didn't invite the mother just to help her husband patch things up with her....this wife is also contemplating leaving Arnold and thinks his mother's adultery is somehow romantic! TO make things worse, it turns out that it won't just be the four of them....Arnold's father just arrived! What's next? See the film.
The problems with this film are all in the final act. The story seems abbreviated and loses its way...probably because of the excised footage. Because of that, much of the cleverness of the original film is missing and the story just okay and no better.
When the story begins, you see that Elizabeth is married to an incredibly dull man, Arnold. But she has a surprise for him...she's invited Arnold's mother and her husband to stay with them. This is a huge surprise because Arnold's mother left him and her husband many years ago....and they've had no interaction since! Now the wife didn't invite the mother just to help her husband patch things up with her....this wife is also contemplating leaving Arnold and thinks his mother's adultery is somehow romantic! TO make things worse, it turns out that it won't just be the four of them....Arnold's father just arrived! What's next? See the film.
The problems with this film are all in the final act. The story seems abbreviated and loses its way...probably because of the excised footage. Because of that, much of the cleverness of the original film is missing and the story just okay and no better.
- planktonrules
- Jan 24, 2021
- Permalink
I had never heard of Catherine Dale Owen before,which is hardly surprising given that she only appeared in about 6 films.However after this performance i do not think that i will ever forget her.She seems to enunciate every word to twice its natural length.I think that she must have gone to the vocal coach featured in "Singing In The Rain".There is one scene where she is seated having a discussion.Every time the other actor talks she looks away with a doleful stare.When it comes to her lines she turns and almost stares into the camera as if reading an idiot board.Then when she speaks her lines she seems to want to make a different hand gesture for every word.The tone of her voice hardly altering.So to Catherine i retrospectively award the Razzie for the worst actress of 1930.A well merited award!
- malcolmgsw
- Feb 2, 2006
- Permalink
This turgid screen version of Somerset Maugham's "The Circle" suffers not only from the dated story, but from performances by seasoned silent performers who seem absolutely overwhelmed by the sound equipment. The first scene suffers as the juveniles insist of making sure their emotions can be read in the second balcony. Even Lewis Stone seems ill at ease, until Ernest Torrence and Alison Skipworth come on.
Torrence is a delight, complaining about his dentures, and Skipworth is wonderful. The camera is not quite immobile, but it does move leadenly -- quite appropriately in following Torrence, but it does move rapidly when needed to maintain composition -- something that modern film makers don't seem to think important But Lewis Stone's register runs all over the place, overacting in antique style even for 1930 with the youngsters, and fairly natural with Torrence and Skipworth. The total effect is bad.
Torrence is a delight, complaining about his dentures, and Skipworth is wonderful. The camera is not quite immobile, but it does move leadenly -- quite appropriately in following Torrence, but it does move rapidly when needed to maintain composition -- something that modern film makers don't seem to think important But Lewis Stone's register runs all over the place, overacting in antique style even for 1930 with the youngsters, and fairly natural with Torrence and Skipworth. The total effect is bad.
- mark.waltz
- Aug 3, 2015
- Permalink
- SnoopyStyle
- Nov 1, 2024
- Permalink
This film has its weaknesses, starting with its silly title (the original title of the W. Somerset Maugham play it's based on, "The Circle," is better and should have been retained) and some of the ridiculous makeups the actors are forced to wear (Lewis Stone especially it took me a while to discern his familiar features under all that greasepaint and hair cream), but all in all it's a good drawing room comedy/melodrama. Like Oscar Wilde and Noël Coward, Maugham was a (mostly) Gay writer whose sensibility came out (so to speak) in a jaundiced view of heterosexuality, and there are several unusual aspects to this plot including the fascinating twist that 30 years after they did the dashingly romantic thing of running off together without first divorcing their spouses, Lord Porteous (Ernest Torrence) and Lady Champion-Cheney (Alison Skipworth) are as miserable as any married couple could possibly be after that length of time. I'd heard so many bad things about Catherine Dale Owen over the years that it was a surprise to see one of her films and actually find her quite good energetic, high-spirited and fully in command of her role and of course it's also always a treat to see Alison Skipworth, the one person who ever stole a scene from W. C. Fields and the principal villain (a sex-changed version of the Sydney Greenstreet role) in the otherwise pretty dismal second version of "The Maltese Falcon," called "Satan met a Lady." Her costume representing an attempt to dress as a youthful coquette, defying her extra years and bulk is itself a piece of minor film-making genius. David Burton's direction is mostly commonplace but has some inspired moments, notably the animation of the young Lady Champion-Cheney's photo in the album early on. And at only 56 minutes, the film lasts just as long as it needs to for the story it has to tell and isn't padded out to fill extra running time the way so many films are today.
- mgconlan-1
- Nov 15, 2005
- Permalink
This is a sound remake of the silent film "The Circle" from 1925 that is mainly remembered for being Joan Crawford's screen debut, which in turn was an adaptation of Somerset Maugham's play.
Elizabeth (Catherine Dale Owen) is married to Arnold (Tyrell Davis), but she's fallen in love with the visiting Canadian farmer Ted (Paul Cavanagh). From the start Catherine had my sympathy because Arnold is insufferable. He's stiff, rude to the servants, and is only interested in his career in Parliament. He goes on and on about a Chippendale chair that has just arrived but tells his wife when she complains that they've grown apart that, after three years of marriage, they should consider their romantic days behind them! Compliments to Tyrell Davis, because he manages to play Arnold as the most unattractive and unsympathetic man imaginable.
Arnold's mother, Lady Catherine, left his father thirty years ago for another man, Lord Porteous, and they have been visiting England, so Elizabeth invites them over. She does this because Arnold hasn't seen his mother since he was five, but she's also curious as to how this arrangement has worked out since she is entertaining doing the same to Arnold. She only did this because Arnold's father (Lewis Stone) is in Paris and thus the three won't inadvertently run into one another. But then, moments before Arnold's mother and Lord Porteous are to arrive, Arnold's father unexpectedly returns. Complications ensue.
For an early sound film missing about seventeen minutes of what was originally shot, I thought this was a pretty good early talkie effort. For sure the plot kept me engaged as to what choice Elizabeth would make - To stay because of morality and duty or leave because of love? For sure the older generation is making a case for her staying. Arnold's mother herself talks about how she has no security in her relationship with Lord Porteous (Ernest Torrence) because they are not married, and how she has had to endure affairs on his part and having no financial security.
The cast is marvelous. Catherine Dale Owen could be as stiff as a board - It's why she didn't last past the very early days of talking film once more lively actresses arrived on the scene. But here she is very authentic. Ernest Torrence is marvelous as Lord Porteous, Lady Catherine's longtime lover who has turned into the original grumpy old man with bad dentures. What confused me is what part Mary Forbes was playing in all of this. If not for the major plot point of Arnold's mother having abandoned him when he was five, I would have guessed her to be his mother. She certainly feels confident that it's her place to tell him to stand up straight and stop whining. An aunt perhaps who filled the void after Arnold's mother left? It's never said.
Technically speaking it's a bit dialogue heavy given there is really only one thread to the plot, and I liked the way the title music segues into the opening horse-riding scene and the scene with photo album come-to-life.
It never drags and there are much worse ways to spend an hour.
Elizabeth (Catherine Dale Owen) is married to Arnold (Tyrell Davis), but she's fallen in love with the visiting Canadian farmer Ted (Paul Cavanagh). From the start Catherine had my sympathy because Arnold is insufferable. He's stiff, rude to the servants, and is only interested in his career in Parliament. He goes on and on about a Chippendale chair that has just arrived but tells his wife when she complains that they've grown apart that, after three years of marriage, they should consider their romantic days behind them! Compliments to Tyrell Davis, because he manages to play Arnold as the most unattractive and unsympathetic man imaginable.
Arnold's mother, Lady Catherine, left his father thirty years ago for another man, Lord Porteous, and they have been visiting England, so Elizabeth invites them over. She does this because Arnold hasn't seen his mother since he was five, but she's also curious as to how this arrangement has worked out since she is entertaining doing the same to Arnold. She only did this because Arnold's father (Lewis Stone) is in Paris and thus the three won't inadvertently run into one another. But then, moments before Arnold's mother and Lord Porteous are to arrive, Arnold's father unexpectedly returns. Complications ensue.
For an early sound film missing about seventeen minutes of what was originally shot, I thought this was a pretty good early talkie effort. For sure the plot kept me engaged as to what choice Elizabeth would make - To stay because of morality and duty or leave because of love? For sure the older generation is making a case for her staying. Arnold's mother herself talks about how she has no security in her relationship with Lord Porteous (Ernest Torrence) because they are not married, and how she has had to endure affairs on his part and having no financial security.
The cast is marvelous. Catherine Dale Owen could be as stiff as a board - It's why she didn't last past the very early days of talking film once more lively actresses arrived on the scene. But here she is very authentic. Ernest Torrence is marvelous as Lord Porteous, Lady Catherine's longtime lover who has turned into the original grumpy old man with bad dentures. What confused me is what part Mary Forbes was playing in all of this. If not for the major plot point of Arnold's mother having abandoned him when he was five, I would have guessed her to be his mother. She certainly feels confident that it's her place to tell him to stand up straight and stop whining. An aunt perhaps who filled the void after Arnold's mother left? It's never said.
Technically speaking it's a bit dialogue heavy given there is really only one thread to the plot, and I liked the way the title music segues into the opening horse-riding scene and the scene with photo album come-to-life.
It never drags and there are much worse ways to spend an hour.
Well, it's a somerset maugham story, so we know its going to be a drama, with lots of pain for someone at some point. The story opens with Arnold Champion Cheney (Tyrell Davis) fawning over a chippendale chair he just received. We see signs of trouble, as his wife Elizabeth (Catherine Owen) complains that he likes his belongings more than he likes her. Then it is announced that Champion's mother (Alison Skipworth) is coming for an unexpected visit. LOVE Alison Skipworth, so fun to see her as Lady Champion, stirring things up. Elizabeth starts spending time alone with Ted the Canadian, so we can see there is trouble in paradise. At one point, we see Tyrell Davis with an "alfalfa" type hairdo... not sure what the point of that was ? The main story is about the friction between Elizabeth and Arnold, and with Arnold's parents as well. Lots of dinner party scenes, lots of talking, but you can tell we are missing some of the story, with 20 minutes cut from the film. No big deal really. Not Alison Skipworth's best work. This was her first talkie.... she was SO much better in her later films. See her in one of the W.C. Fields films instead. Lewis Stone (from Grand Hotel) is in here as well.
Owen stopped acting in 1931, so she doesn't seem to have done well in the talkies. Directed by David Burton, who only directed about 15 films, mostly in the 1930s. He doesn't seem to have stuck around long. Screenplay by Sylvia Thalberg, the sister of big-time producer Irving Thalberg.
Owen stopped acting in 1931, so she doesn't seem to have done well in the talkies. Directed by David Burton, who only directed about 15 films, mostly in the 1930s. He doesn't seem to have stuck around long. Screenplay by Sylvia Thalberg, the sister of big-time producer Irving Thalberg.
- JohnHowardReid
- Aug 2, 2015
- Permalink