A war officer who is thought dead returns to the woman he loves, only to find that she has remarried.A war officer who is thought dead returns to the woman he loves, only to find that she has remarried.A war officer who is thought dead returns to the woman he loves, only to find that she has remarried.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Daisy Belmore
- Tibbetts - Nurse
- (uncredited)
Billy Bevan
- Departing British Soldier
- (uncredited)
Edmund Breon
- Tom Kent
- (uncredited)
Eddy Chandler
- Captain Peters
- (uncredited)
Jay Eaton
- Dancing Doughboy
- (uncredited)
Bill Elliott
- Dancing Doughboy
- (uncredited)
Fred Esmelton
- Ponsonby's Butler
- (uncredited)
Mary Forbes
- The Duchess
- (uncredited)
Elizabeth Forrester
- Evelyn Kent
- (uncredited)
Robert Greig
- Hansom Cabby
- (uncredited)
Olaf Hytten
- Aide to Major General
- (uncredited)
Claude King
- Major General Visiting Hospital
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe first of four films co-starring Constance Bennett with Joel McCrea, the other three being The Common Law (1931), Rockabye (1932), and Bed of Roses (1933).
- GoofsIn an early sequence set in 1918, Constance Bennett is shown playing a phonograph record on the Victor label--but the label is the "scroll design" Victor didn't use until 1925.
- Crazy creditsDebut of actress Eily Malyon.
Featured review
Born to Love (1931) is rather silly but nevertheless is a good example of a candid treatment of divorce law before the Production Code of 1935 put a stop to serious treatment of divorce or of pre-marital sexuality. Stuck in a loveless marriage to Wilfred, a haughty English aristocrat, Doris causes Wilfred to believe she has committed adultery. The consequences to her are catastrophic.
The plot is creaky and relies on numerous contrivances. The acting is highly forgettable. Nevertheless, the issues of fault-based divorce are important ones. The movie also concerns the conflict between marriage as an institution for love and fulfillment as opposed to a unemotional union designed for the mutual support of spouses and children. Needless to say, divorce law in the old days was much better adapted to the latter vision of marriage than the former.
The plot is creaky and relies on numerous contrivances. The acting is highly forgettable. Nevertheless, the issues of fault-based divorce are important ones. The movie also concerns the conflict between marriage as an institution for love and fulfillment as opposed to a unemotional union designed for the mutual support of spouses and children. Needless to say, divorce law in the old days was much better adapted to the latter vision of marriage than the former.
- Michael-110
- Sep 6, 1999
- Permalink
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $338,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 21 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content