A newspaper editor goes on an anti-crime crusade, but gets carried away.A newspaper editor goes on an anti-crime crusade, but gets carried away.A newspaper editor goes on an anti-crime crusade, but gets carried away.
Thomas E. Jackson
- Police Chief Berkley
- (as Thomas Jackson)
Fred Aldrich
- Cop
- (uncredited)
Nora Cecil
- Miss Lovelace
- (uncredited)
Wheaton Chambers
- Witness
- (uncredited)
Harry Cheshire
- Police Chief Masters
- (uncredited)
Leander De Cordova
- Undetermined Role
- (uncredited)
John Dehner
- Willard Erskine
- (uncredited)
Ralph Dunn
- Mac- Policeman
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe failure of the original copyright holder to renew the film's copyright resulted in it falling into public domain, meaning that virtually anyone could duplicate and sell a VHS/DVD copy of the film. Therefore, many of the versions of this film available on the market are either severely (and usually badly) edited and/or of extremely poor quality, having been duped from second- or third-generation (or more) copies of the film.
- ConnectionsFollowed by Big Town After Dark (1947)
Featured review
For a cheap B-movie, "Big Town" is very good. But I must warn you, this material might seem very similar as the film seems much like a reworking of the genius film, "Five Star Final" from 1931. And, since "Five Star Final" was first and better, there isn't a lot of reason to watch "Big Town"...whether a pleasant film or not.
The films is about the newspaper business and the seedy side. It seems that a big city paper is doing poorly, so the owner brings in a hot-shot editor to shake things up. This guy now is concerned with readership revenues first...whether the paper behaves ethically or not. Much of the film, the editor bangs heads with his reporters, particularly a lady reporter, over what is and what isn't ethical regarding their stories.
While I enjoyed the film, I do think the film gives a somewhat mixed message about yellow journalism. In some ways, it seems to condemn it and at other times it doesn't. And, as I mentioned before, it's not the most original plot. Still, it does show you that the ethics of newspaper headlines hasn't really changed that much over the years!
By the way, this film apparently did pretty well as it had two sequels...which, like this film, are currently posted on YouTube.
The films is about the newspaper business and the seedy side. It seems that a big city paper is doing poorly, so the owner brings in a hot-shot editor to shake things up. This guy now is concerned with readership revenues first...whether the paper behaves ethically or not. Much of the film, the editor bangs heads with his reporters, particularly a lady reporter, over what is and what isn't ethical regarding their stories.
While I enjoyed the film, I do think the film gives a somewhat mixed message about yellow journalism. In some ways, it seems to condemn it and at other times it doesn't. And, as I mentioned before, it's not the most original plot. Still, it does show you that the ethics of newspaper headlines hasn't really changed that much over the years!
By the way, this film apparently did pretty well as it had two sequels...which, like this film, are currently posted on YouTube.
- planktonrules
- Feb 9, 2021
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content