21 reviews
Though it might mean absolutely nothing to today's audience when you see the small mustached frame of Walter Abel who has been named a Special Prosecutor back in 1938 there was no doubt that Abel was a very thinly disguised portrayal of real life Special Prosecutor and newly elected District Attorney of New York County, Thomas E. Dewey.
Among the many rackets that Dewey did investigate and prosecute was an effort to organize truckers and get a stranglehold on the produce markets of New York City. This film is taken from some very true and recent headlines back in the day.
Warner Brothers loved Mr. Dewey and his prosecutorial exploits. A few years earlier Humphrey Bogart, the chief villain in this film, played a Dewey like prosecutor himself in Marked Woman which is based in part on how Dewey convicted Lucky Luciano via his stranglehold on houses of prostitution.
The hero in Racketbusters is George Brent, stepping into a role that James Cagney probably turned down. He's a truckdriver who resists organization either by an honest union or the racketeers. And he's got ideas from the street about the social standing of stool pigeons.
When things happen to his wife Gloria Dickson and his friend Oscar O'Shea, Brent himself becomes as big a racketbuster as Walter Abel.
Allen Jenkins is a surprise here. Usually a mug whether a good guy or a bad guy, Jenkins steps up to the plate here as a man who went from the truckdriving game to the produce business. He understands the point of view of both sides and urges them to settle and kick out Bogart and his henchmen. Good job by Jenkins.
No doubt in 1938 who this film was all about.
Among the many rackets that Dewey did investigate and prosecute was an effort to organize truckers and get a stranglehold on the produce markets of New York City. This film is taken from some very true and recent headlines back in the day.
Warner Brothers loved Mr. Dewey and his prosecutorial exploits. A few years earlier Humphrey Bogart, the chief villain in this film, played a Dewey like prosecutor himself in Marked Woman which is based in part on how Dewey convicted Lucky Luciano via his stranglehold on houses of prostitution.
The hero in Racketbusters is George Brent, stepping into a role that James Cagney probably turned down. He's a truckdriver who resists organization either by an honest union or the racketeers. And he's got ideas from the street about the social standing of stool pigeons.
When things happen to his wife Gloria Dickson and his friend Oscar O'Shea, Brent himself becomes as big a racketbuster as Walter Abel.
Allen Jenkins is a surprise here. Usually a mug whether a good guy or a bad guy, Jenkins steps up to the plate here as a man who went from the truckdriving game to the produce business. He understands the point of view of both sides and urges them to settle and kick out Bogart and his henchmen. Good job by Jenkins.
No doubt in 1938 who this film was all about.
- bkoganbing
- Aug 4, 2006
- Permalink
- classicsoncall
- Nov 8, 2004
- Permalink
Tough gangster movie with Humphrey Bogart playing a racketeer putting the squeeze on truck drivers hauling produce. The unlikeliest of all truckers, George Brent, tries to fight the mob but eventually is forced to cooperate. Brent is an ill-fit for a working class Joe but he does an admirable job. Allen Jenkins is fun as Brent's friend Skeets. Walter Abel is OK as a crusading DA, inspired by Thomas Dewey, but doesn't seem like a match for Bogie. Between him and Brent, neither really powerhouse personas, it's no wonder Bogie walks away with the film. From the very first scene Bogart's character is fed up with failure and wants to make it to the top by any means necessary. It's like they took all the gangsters he's played up to this point and rolled them into one, giving them a final chance to make it big. And no matter how bad he was to others in this, I was pulling for him. The rest of the fine cast includes Gloria Dickson, Penny Singleton, Henry O'Neill, Fay Helm, and Joe Downing. Nice action and characters. If, like me, you're a sucker for seeing old cars and trucks in action in older films, you'll get your fill here. Definitely worth a look for fans of the WB crime dramas of the 1930s.
- planktonrules
- Sep 26, 2006
- Permalink
Most gangster movies I've seen focus on the bad guy (Cagney/Robinson) or perhaps on the cop or D.A. trying to bust the gangs.
This movie, however, focuses on the people who are affected by the racketeers: the truckers who were forced into a crooked association run by Bogart. We see how the truckers, their families and businesses, are hurt by the protection rackets and bullying gangsters (who always wear nice hats and suits).
The producers are careful not to make this an anti-union movie, even though the plot is about gang incursions into unions. It's really a propaganda film, trying to convince union members and other working men to stand up and testify against gang pressures. The acting is OK, and there's plenty of action (explosions, car wrecks, fist fights) to keep you interested.
My favorite scenes involve gangsters using axes and creosote to destroy big crates of vegetables. Not quite your standard gangster fare!
This movie, however, focuses on the people who are affected by the racketeers: the truckers who were forced into a crooked association run by Bogart. We see how the truckers, their families and businesses, are hurt by the protection rackets and bullying gangsters (who always wear nice hats and suits).
The producers are careful not to make this an anti-union movie, even though the plot is about gang incursions into unions. It's really a propaganda film, trying to convince union members and other working men to stand up and testify against gang pressures. The acting is OK, and there's plenty of action (explosions, car wrecks, fist fights) to keep you interested.
My favorite scenes involve gangsters using axes and creosote to destroy big crates of vegetables. Not quite your standard gangster fare!
- LCShackley
- Dec 9, 2009
- Permalink
This was the first Humphrey Bogart movie I ever saw when I was a young kid growing up in the 60's & 70's. I first discovered Bogie on "Humphrey Bogart Theatre" on TV. I was very impressed with his portrayal of a mafia style crime boss. Gangsters were once Bogarts specialty, he was good at it, this movie pre-dates "On The Waterfront" & is almost as good. The film opens with Bogart bent on wanting to take over the entire town & muscle in on the trucking business. "I got plans & I got organization", "nothings going to stop me", "I'll make this whole town pay off from blue-backs to bankers".
This is Bogart playing the lead role as John "Czar" Martin, Manhattens most powerful gang chief, Bogie is very cold & ruthless in this one & it's clear he is the main character even though he's not in every scene, most of the film focuses more on the George Brent character as one of the truckers who complies with Martins underworld organization after Bogie's henchmen sets Brents truck on fire. Eventually he & Allen Jenkins rally all the truckers against Bogart in a free for all. It's a propaganda movie showing why unions were needed & organized in the 1930's but it also shows how corrupt unions can get by bribery & intimidation by the syndicate.
The absence of Bogarts character doesn't really weaken the film but creates an interesting mystique for his character is much talked about but hardly ever seen which heightens & magnifies Bogarts exciting screen presence. Like in "The Petrified Forest" Bogie played a famous celebrated John Dillinger style outlaw. He doesn't enter the film until the 2nd half of the movie but his character is mentioned consistently from the very beginning of the film creating this mystique. Kind of a sense of mystery so you just sit & watch the movie just waiting in suspense to see when "Duke Mantee" first enters & dominates the movie from that point on.
"Racket Busters" does a similar thing with Bogart's character as "Czar" Martin & the gimmick works & for once Bogart doesn't get killed in the end unlike his other gangsters where he gets bumped off. Sometimes less is more, a character that lays low or not seen much makes the character that much more interesting & desirable. In "The Maltese Falcon" Floyd Thursby was a character much talked about all through the entire movie..... but never seen. I have a bootleg copy of "Racket Busters" & I don't think it's out on DVD yet, it should be because it's not too bad, it's a standard programmer & it's worth watching if you're a fan of Bogart & gangster films like I am. Racket Busters is the precursor to On The Waterfront. What more can be said ?
This is Bogart playing the lead role as John "Czar" Martin, Manhattens most powerful gang chief, Bogie is very cold & ruthless in this one & it's clear he is the main character even though he's not in every scene, most of the film focuses more on the George Brent character as one of the truckers who complies with Martins underworld organization after Bogie's henchmen sets Brents truck on fire. Eventually he & Allen Jenkins rally all the truckers against Bogart in a free for all. It's a propaganda movie showing why unions were needed & organized in the 1930's but it also shows how corrupt unions can get by bribery & intimidation by the syndicate.
The absence of Bogarts character doesn't really weaken the film but creates an interesting mystique for his character is much talked about but hardly ever seen which heightens & magnifies Bogarts exciting screen presence. Like in "The Petrified Forest" Bogie played a famous celebrated John Dillinger style outlaw. He doesn't enter the film until the 2nd half of the movie but his character is mentioned consistently from the very beginning of the film creating this mystique. Kind of a sense of mystery so you just sit & watch the movie just waiting in suspense to see when "Duke Mantee" first enters & dominates the movie from that point on.
"Racket Busters" does a similar thing with Bogart's character as "Czar" Martin & the gimmick works & for once Bogart doesn't get killed in the end unlike his other gangsters where he gets bumped off. Sometimes less is more, a character that lays low or not seen much makes the character that much more interesting & desirable. In "The Maltese Falcon" Floyd Thursby was a character much talked about all through the entire movie..... but never seen. I have a bootleg copy of "Racket Busters" & I don't think it's out on DVD yet, it should be because it's not too bad, it's a standard programmer & it's worth watching if you're a fan of Bogart & gangster films like I am. Racket Busters is the precursor to On The Waterfront. What more can be said ?
- gullwing592003
- Jul 23, 2011
- Permalink
'Racket Buster" plays like a Public Service announcement, or like a "Crime Does Not Pay" short which were popular in the 30's and 40's. Not much time wasted, as the film gets right to the point; racketeering throughout the city which the DA (Walter Abel) tries hard to stop. The head of the rackets is Humphrey Bogart and the hero is George Brent along with his pal, Allen Jenkins.
There is no time for subtlety or nuance here (at 71 mins.) and the characters are painted with broad strokes and many plot points are telegraphed. Nevertheless, the picture is well done all around and is better and more entertaining than the websites rating would suggest. Probably a 'B' picture in its' time but plays almost like an 'A'.
7/10 - Website no longer prints my star rating.
There is no time for subtlety or nuance here (at 71 mins.) and the characters are painted with broad strokes and many plot points are telegraphed. Nevertheless, the picture is well done all around and is better and more entertaining than the websites rating would suggest. Probably a 'B' picture in its' time but plays almost like an 'A'.
7/10 - Website no longer prints my star rating.
George Brent was great at playing the gentleman, whether that gentleman was a wealthy man of great stature in the community, or whether he was a struggling up-and-comer as he was in "Lilly Turner". He always played a guy who knew who he was and the path he was on. This story of the syndicate attempting to take over the trucking industry by force is sunk not only by a rather formulaic script, but by Brent in the lead in a role that looks like it was written more for James Cagney or maybe even Paul Muni.
Brent plays Denny Jordan, an independent trucker who is out for himself, thinks with his fists, and even squishes a tomato into the face of his partner, Skeets (Allen Jenkins), for no particular reason other than he seems to think it's funny. This is just not appealing stuff for George Brent fans to watch. Humphrey Bogart is perfectly cast as the head of the syndicate, but he spends very little time on screen, usually just a few seconds at a time as he barks orders at subordinates about the next move they should make.
It's pretty bad when the thinking man in the film, Skeets, is portrayed by Allen Jenkins, who usually plays the well-meaning if somewhat thick-skulled comic relief. Penny Singleton is a breath of fresh air as Gladys Christie, Skeet's girl who seems surprised every time her man gets a good idea or runs into a piece of good luck.
I'd skip this one. It's not terrible, it just does nothing to distinguish itself in either the plot or performance categories.
Brent plays Denny Jordan, an independent trucker who is out for himself, thinks with his fists, and even squishes a tomato into the face of his partner, Skeets (Allen Jenkins), for no particular reason other than he seems to think it's funny. This is just not appealing stuff for George Brent fans to watch. Humphrey Bogart is perfectly cast as the head of the syndicate, but he spends very little time on screen, usually just a few seconds at a time as he barks orders at subordinates about the next move they should make.
It's pretty bad when the thinking man in the film, Skeets, is portrayed by Allen Jenkins, who usually plays the well-meaning if somewhat thick-skulled comic relief. Penny Singleton is a breath of fresh air as Gladys Christie, Skeet's girl who seems surprised every time her man gets a good idea or runs into a piece of good luck.
I'd skip this one. It's not terrible, it just does nothing to distinguish itself in either the plot or performance categories.
John Martin (Humphrey Bogart) is the mob leader of the city after his men win various posts in an election. He vows to make everyone pay him. Hugh Allison is recruited by the governor to clean up the rackets. Martin muscles in on the trucking industry and its clean union.
Bogie has a minor role despite being the main villain. He should get his hands dirty and take over the movie. This really should be a battle between him and the truckers. The movie doesn't need Allison. Overall, it's a pedestrian gangster movie.
Bogie has a minor role despite being the main villain. He should get his hands dirty and take over the movie. This really should be a battle between him and the truckers. The movie doesn't need Allison. Overall, it's a pedestrian gangster movie.
- SnoopyStyle
- Aug 11, 2020
- Permalink
If you want to see this movie because Humphrey Bogart is the star, save your time. He gets top billing because of what he became after this movie. In this movie he is in it enough to barely be called a supporting actor. George Brent is the real star, so all Brent fans should watch this (if there are any). Here we have an oddity - our hero prevents the mob from taking over the trucking industry! Of course we know what really happened. Atypical gangster ending for this movie; the length of the jail sentence is also stated! The ending came so quickly that one thinks that is was hastily cobbled together. One positive note is that Allen Jenkins actually plays a good guy for a change.
- JohnHowardReid
- Nov 17, 2017
- Permalink
- Bluedragon-52876
- Jan 12, 2025
- Permalink
Having already taken over a major portion of the restrauant business a crime boss in New York City by the name of "John 'Czar' Martin" (Humphrey Bogart) sets his sights on the trucking industry as well. However, the union which the truckers belong to isn't nearly as easy to persuade and as a result Martin has to get tough with a couple of them to make his point. But one person in particular named "Denny Jordan" (George Brent) remains defiant and because of that both he and his partner "Skeets Wilson" (Allen Jenkins) become even larger targets in the process. In addition to that, a newly appointed special prosecutor by the name of "Allison" (Walter Abel) also appears on the scene which subsequently causes problems for everyone concerned. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was a rather typical gangster film from this time period which benefits to a certain degree by the presence of both Humphrey Bogart and George Brent. It does, however, advance a certain political agenda at times which became a bit obvious here and there but even so it didn't diminish the film too badly overall. In any case, I thought it was essentially worth the time spent to watch it and for that reason I have rated it accordingly. Average.
Racket Busters (1938)
** (out of 4)
Tired crime flick from Warner has Humphrey Bogart playing a racketeer who decides to form a truckers union so that he can take over all the store, drivers and the produce. If people don't go along with this they end up beaten but one man (George Brent) decides to stand up to them. I've always been a fan of Warner's various "B" pictures but this one here left me disappointed for many reasons. For starters, the screenplay really doesn't offer up anything that original as we've seen this story countless times before. Some might say that all of these pictures had the same story and that's true to an extent but I think most took that basic structure and tried to do things their own way. That really doesn't happen here because there isn't a single second in the film where you feel anything for the stuff that's going on. Some of this problem should fall on the shoulders of Bacon who seems to be sleep walking in his director's chair. He usually manages this type of material quite well but perhaps he too found the story boring. Another problem is the D.A. who is extremely boring and his character just doesn't have enough fire behind him to make anyone interested in anything he has to say. Even the performances are rather disappointing as Bogart doesn't do too much and doesn't have half the energy he usually delivers in this type of role. It was somewhat fun seeing Brent in this type of picture but the screenplay doesn't do him any justice either. The normally reliable Allen Jenkins is here playing the comic sidekick but even he can't deliver any laughs. The movie is mildly entertaining if you're a fan of this genre but I think most people are going to sit here and just know that there are much better movies out there and this here is strictly by the numbers.
** (out of 4)
Tired crime flick from Warner has Humphrey Bogart playing a racketeer who decides to form a truckers union so that he can take over all the store, drivers and the produce. If people don't go along with this they end up beaten but one man (George Brent) decides to stand up to them. I've always been a fan of Warner's various "B" pictures but this one here left me disappointed for many reasons. For starters, the screenplay really doesn't offer up anything that original as we've seen this story countless times before. Some might say that all of these pictures had the same story and that's true to an extent but I think most took that basic structure and tried to do things their own way. That really doesn't happen here because there isn't a single second in the film where you feel anything for the stuff that's going on. Some of this problem should fall on the shoulders of Bacon who seems to be sleep walking in his director's chair. He usually manages this type of material quite well but perhaps he too found the story boring. Another problem is the D.A. who is extremely boring and his character just doesn't have enough fire behind him to make anyone interested in anything he has to say. Even the performances are rather disappointing as Bogart doesn't do too much and doesn't have half the energy he usually delivers in this type of role. It was somewhat fun seeing Brent in this type of picture but the screenplay doesn't do him any justice either. The normally reliable Allen Jenkins is here playing the comic sidekick but even he can't deliver any laughs. The movie is mildly entertaining if you're a fan of this genre but I think most people are going to sit here and just know that there are much better movies out there and this here is strictly by the numbers.
- Michael_Elliott
- Jan 21, 2010
- Permalink
A Manhattan racketeer moves in on the trucking business but one trucker stands up against the mob until he is forced into cooperating. A crusading District Attorney is determined to stop the racket but he needs the help of the trucker.
Lesser known gangster film which is watchable but not one of the decade's best. George Brent is the trucker and Walter Abel the District Attorney. Although Humphrey Bogart is top of the bill, his appearances are sporadic and his talent is wasted.
Lesser known gangster film which is watchable but not one of the decade's best. George Brent is the trucker and Walter Abel the District Attorney. Although Humphrey Bogart is top of the bill, his appearances are sporadic and his talent is wasted.
- russjones-80887
- Aug 16, 2020
- Permalink
Gang chief Humphrey Bogart has a plan, the organization and the will. He's going down to the market and squeeze everyone, starting out by organizing the truckers. Which he does, save for a few hold-outs, like Oscar O'Shea (who dies), Alan Jenkins, and Our Hero, George Brent. But even an independent streak a mile wide has to give way when there's no business, and wife Gloria Dickson is in the hospital. Can District Attorney Walter Abel get anyone to talk?
It's one of those hard-hitting exposes of the rackets that came in after the Production Code said you couldn't glamorize the hoods. Nonetheless, it's Bogart who has the top billing here, and when you compare him to Brent, you can understand why he eventually came out on top. Brent is handsome, and has a good voice, but looking at him move in the medium shots is an exercise in klutziness.* Director Lloyd Bacon and DP Arthur Edeson knew it too. Near the end, Bogart is running up a flight of stairs to get away from Brent, and he glides up. After Brent caroms off a wall at the base, there's a cut to him thrashing Bogie.
It's a pretty good movie, but clearly they wanted Cagney for the lead role. With Henry O'Neill, and Penny Singleton.
It's one of those hard-hitting exposes of the rackets that came in after the Production Code said you couldn't glamorize the hoods. Nonetheless, it's Bogart who has the top billing here, and when you compare him to Brent, you can understand why he eventually came out on top. Brent is handsome, and has a good voice, but looking at him move in the medium shots is an exercise in klutziness.* Director Lloyd Bacon and DP Arthur Edeson knew it too. Near the end, Bogart is running up a flight of stairs to get away from Brent, and he glides up. After Brent caroms off a wall at the base, there's a cut to him thrashing Bogie.
It's a pretty good movie, but clearly they wanted Cagney for the lead role. With Henry O'Neill, and Penny Singleton.
Bacon shows 1938 truck interiors, trucks crashing, hospital wards, crowds, produce markets and authentic Depression shock. Bogart is permitted a few scenes with his charisma on full throttle. Allen Jenkins takes over the star role in some scenes to great effect. This is not escapist entertainment. Brent is reduced to a miscast actor surviving his role and the war with domestic terrorism, a theme that remains relevant today. This is more of a newsreel of events than a deep exposition of character. The Warners' dramatization of the fight against organized crime presaged the mobilization against fascism in 1942.
- michaelchager
- Sep 2, 2023
- Permalink
- mark.waltz
- May 3, 2018
- Permalink
This movie illustrates very well that the differences between gangsters racketeers and the US government is subtle at best. Both use intimidation to get what they want from the little guy. While the gangsters may beat you up, the government will throw you in jail. There's very little difference in the methodology. I honestly don't know which person was more despicable, the gang leader or the special prosecutor. Both used and abused their power and squeezed the poor hard-working truck drivers in order to get what they wanted. Both were disgusting.
- thompsonm-05031
- Oct 17, 2019
- Permalink
- tadpole-596-918256
- Oct 16, 2019
- Permalink