74
Metascore
10 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 100Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonSuperb, vibrantly emotional drama. [27 Apr 2001, p.C1]
- 80The New York TimesBosley CrowtherThe New York TimesBosley CrowtherMiss Wood has a beauty and radiance that carry her through a role of violent passions and depressions with unsullied purity and strength. There is poetry in her performance, and her eyes in the final scene bespeak the moral significance and emotional fulfillment of this film.
- 80SalonCharles TaylorSalonCharles TaylorLike nobody else, Kazan succeeded in capturing the overheated, self-pitying dramatization so near and dear to the teenage heart.
- 75Entertainment WeeklyLisa SchwarzbaumEntertainment WeeklyLisa SchwarzbaumWith his ripe lips, flirty eyes, and pre-Calvin Klein-era androgynous appeal, the 24-year-old Warren is utterly believable as a boy who drives Natalie Wood plumb insane with sexual frustration in William Inge’s overheated melodrama.
- 75Slant MagazineEric HendersonSlant MagazineEric HendersonInge’s scenario unravels alarmingly once the two would-be lovers start to drift apart thanks to Deanie’s nervous breakdown and the simultaneous (almost psychically connected) market crash of 1929, but the first half of the film is a tour de force of deferred urges, contortion acts of awkward intimacy, and the thrill of adolescence.
- 75LarsenOnFilmJosh LarsenLarsenOnFilmJosh LarsenSplendor in the Grass may seem quaint, even silly. But anyone who’s thrown – or endured – a teenager’s temper tantrum will recognize the anger and confusion on the screen as genuine. In that sense, Splendor will never be out of touch.
- 60TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineYouth exploitation pictures were all the rage at the time, and while this is better than some in execution and intent, it's still exactly that.
- 60EmpireAngie ErrigoEmpireAngie ErrigoNatalie Wood is stunning and the drama is full of passion but this suffers a little from 60s hollywood style.
- 50Elia Kazan's production of William Inge's original screenplay covers a forbidding chunk of ground with great care, compassion and cinematic flair. Yet there is something awkward about the picture's mechanical rhythm. There are missing links and blind alleys within the story. Too much time is spent focusing on characters of minor significance.
- 50The New YorkerPauline KaelThe New YorkerPauline KaelThe movie doesn't suggest that adolescents have a right to sexual experimentation -- it just attacks the corrupted grown-ups for their failure to value love above all else. It's the old corn, fermented in a new way.