Sugarfoot

In some ways the weakest hero on the WB stable, Tom Brewster roamed the West with an "aw shucks" young Jimmy Stewart attitude "and a rifle and a volume of the law". As a youngster, he was my least favoured Western hero, perhaps because he seemed too much the boy next door, too much like a weakling. Will Hutchins did an excellent job in the role, and often the writing was a notch above the other WB Westerns, but there was nothing heroic about the nice guy Tom. There was little heroic about Bret Maverick either but that was a very different matter. And that leads to the problem: Sugarfoot was just too young. Nick Adams may have been young but he was "The Rebel". Tom Brewster: too young, too neutered. Too bad. Not a bad theme song though.

"Sugarfoot" was one of 4 westerns that shared a time slot on the same night. The other shows were "Maverick", "Cheyenne",and "Bronco Lane". So you only got to see each of them once a month. Each had it's own song, and unfortunately, I remember them. They were all different but strangely alike. Sugarfoot was a blond,blue-eyed young man who really went against the "cowboy/hero" type. He was an "aw shucks," type and didn't use his gun as much as other western heroes. Maverick was a smooth talking gambler and was usually funny. Bronco Lane was from Texas and as far as I remember, was his best attribute. Cheyenne was an absolute hunk with broad shoulders, really big chest, and a small waist. Each one of them seemed to just roam around, getting into trouble, rescuing people, and solving crimes. Boy, could we use them nowadays.

Will Hutchins (as Sugarcoat Tom Brewster) is not one's idea of a leading man, action hero or western star, but maybe that doesn't matter. His boyish charm is no different from Peter Falk's charade as Columbo or Peter Seller's nonsense as The Pink Panther. What makes the show fun is its humor (often passed off as naivety), the on-location scenery, and the appearance of many of the well-known character actors of the time, along with guest stars long before they reached their prime.

The story lines are unusual. Some are touching, some violent, and many offer a message in morality and justice (the lead character is an extremely moral and just person). Some nice bits of history are thrown in, too, with references to the prejudices of the time, including toward Indians (Native Americans) and Blacks. And the treatment of women; many of the episodes feature strong women.

All in all, justice prevails--as you would expect--but the stories leave the viewer feeling good.

in this day and age when you hear of stars being snooty, I am pleased to report that both Will Hutchins and Clint Walker are two very nice, unpretentious people. Years ago I wrote Will Hutchins C/o NBC where he was working and what I got back was a very nice, personal hand written letter that answered all my questions I asked him, no form letter. Through a friend I got Clint Walkers e-mail and have corresponded with him off and on for two years...he is a gentleman and very nice person. Too bad all the stars are not like these two. How many of you have written stars and gotten back a form letter that said simply "Thank you for writing" or worse no answer at all? These two men know who they owe their fame too-the public, fans like us.

I'm sure WB's writers were attempting to create a unique, if unlikely hero. The clean-cut boyish good looks were exactly what they were looking for. There were plenty of tough guys-Paladin, Bronco Lane,Rowdy Yates, etc. There were a couple of clever and slightly cowardly con men: Bart and Bret Maverick. What there was not was a nice, clean-cut kid to stand against evil-until Sugarfoot sauntered onto the scene, that is. The challenge, of course, was for this young kid to defend us from evil once a week for four years. It was the classic "Clark Kent/ Superman" formula except that there were no phone booths in the Old West !