User reviews

Coburn was interesting as the plain spoken wild card pathologist Peter Carey who enters a new hospital brimming with problems. Right off the bat a fellow practitioner is accused of a crime which he couldn't possibly have committed. Carey must unravel criminal activities within the institution to clear his friend which puts him in the sights of a psychotic killer. So-so thriller/drama.

MGM gave a very stylish treatment to Michael Crichton's novel The Carey Treatment and provided James Coburn with one of his career roles as a pathologist/sleuth.

Coburn has good reason to turn amateur detective in his new hospital in Boston. His friend and colleague James Hong has been accused of murder and of performing illegal abortions. In super Catholic Boston in 1972 that was the worst kind of charge you can make.

Not only that the deceased is Melissa Torme-March the 15 year old daughter of the hospital head Dan O'Herlihy. O'Herlihy is head of a family where everyone goes into or is expected to go into medicine. His daughter was thought to go to Hong for an illegal abortion which was botched. Remember this was before Roe vs. Wade and there were all kinds of back alley abortion providers. Hong tells us he's feeling that women should control their own bodies and charges only lab fees. Others make big money off it, including some of the deceased's own family members. All hush hush and quite hypocritical, but those were the times.

Coburn's training as a pathologist makes him suspect that the young woman wasn't even pregnant, but there were some thefts of narcotics at the hospital that the police are also interested in.

Director Blake Edwards did well by his ensemble cast. For a doctor Coburn is hip and groovy as the times and pretty ruthless in pursuit of justice for his friend. Getting a career performance was Michael Blodgett who normally played beautiful surfer types, here he's one murderess masseuse. Skye Aubrey does well as a drug addicted nurse.

After forty years The Carey Treatment holds up well and is a painful reminder that women need access to safe and legal abortions as well as a fine medical murder mystery.

This little known medical thriller seems like a second cousin to "Coma" and fans of that film should enjoy this one as well. Coburn is a free-living pathologist hired on at a large Boston hospital who almost immediately finds himself trying to disprove a murder rap placed on one of his colleagues. A fellow doctor (Hong, in one of his more substantial roles) is accused of performing an illegal abortion on a fifteen-year-old girl, which led to her death. That the girl is the daughter of the Chief of Staff is no small complication! Coburn must put all the pieces together to find out what actually happened while fending off his protective and commandeering boss (O'Herlihy.) He still finds time, however, to play with O'Neill (whose thankless part only offers one or two decent moments.) Some of the situations and dialogue are inherently "70's", but it is still engrossing entertainment. Coburn has one scene with the great Allen. This effortlessly sophisticated and witty actress partakes in some snappy repartee with him and sparks fly in the well written scene. Coburn also has a memorable run-in with Dreier who nonchalantly simmers some sauce while discussing his niece's death. The subject matter of the film is a bit unsettling and gets increasingly so (and more violent) as it nears its pretty gory climax. Some will view this as a good thing, others may be put off. One scene involving a masseuse and client is quite tense. This leads to some bloodletting and then a nail-biting, if a bit far-fetched, finale. Aubrey is the daughter of Phyllis Thaxter and looks much like her. Blake Edwards' daughter Jennifer has a small, but featured role as the dead girl's roommate. TV fans will note the presence of Hillerman and Mandan as doctors on staff. One complaint: With all the dramatics and hysterics during the resolution, it can be hard to hear what actually happened! Keep the remote handy for a rewind.

Pathologist Peter Carey (James Coburn) moves to Boston for a job at a hospital there. He meets Dr. David Tao (James Hong) and they become friends. He also romances beautiful Georgia Hightower (Jennifer O'Neill). Also Tao does abortions on the side (they were illegal in 1972). Then a hospital administrators daughter dies of a botched abortion and Tao is arrested. He didn't do it and Carey sets out to find out who did.

OK thriller elevated by Coburn's great performance and beautiful Boston locations. The script has plot holes and moves kind of slowly but it's OK. O'Neill look incredible but is given nothing to do. Director Blake Edwards disowned this film in later years saying the studio interfered with it. It's not good but it's not that bad either.

Curiously mediocre, middle-of-the-road film from director Blake Edwards, adapted from Michael Crichton's novel "A Case of Need," has James Coburn (cocky as ever, and enjoyably so) playing the new pathologist at a Boston hospital, sorting out the mystery of a young murder victim. Light drama keeps tongue-in-cheek yet has aspirations to be a whodunit and doesn't quite make the grade. Coburn's general panache is effortless, but he's just coasting through, and the role doesn't challenge him (or us) in any way. Jennifer O'Neill is attractive but (once again) underused as a romantic interest. Screenwriter Harriet Frank used the pseudonym James P. Bonner for the credits--just as original writer Crichton did (as Jeffrey Hudson) for his book! **1/2 from ****

Hip, distinguished doctor James Coburn (as Peter Carey) arrives to accept a position as pathologist at a Boston hospital. Almost immediately, Mr. Coburn beds beautiful nutritionist Jennifer O'Neill (as Georgia Hightower). While sleeping with Ms. O'Neill, Coburn is awakened by an emergency involving a botched abortion - the fifteen-year-old who bleeds to death happens to be the daughter of the hospital's big donor, Dan O'Herlihy (as J.D. Randall). Coburn doesn't believe the man arrested, doctor pal James Hong (as David Tao), committed the crime; although, Mr. Hong admits to performing illegal abortions on the side. While trying to clear his friend, Coburn wades through a thickening plot…

**** The Carey Treatment (3/29/72) Blake Edwards ~ James Coburn, Jennifer O'Neill, Michael Blodgett, James Hong

Not many people remember "The Carey Treatment", and I can't say I blame them.

Blake Edwards did this during his lean years (i.e. - between "Pink Panther" movies.) and for a story of a doctor turned detective (Coburn) working to solve a murder in his hospital, it's actually pretty forgettable.

Coburn is dependable as always and O'Neill is beautiful as always but there just seems to be something missing from the proceedings. The story twists and turns aren't very involving and even the climax, which is supposed to be nerve-wracking, is gut-wrenching instead.

A missed opportunity altogether, and an unfortunate one at that, since it was based on a Michael Crichton book.

Oh well, at least Crichton didn't write a sequel to it.

One star. "Carey" on, Coburn.

This movie is an excellent example how a good director can bring out absolutely outstanding performances by all involved. I think James Coburn was one of THE coolest guys ever. What I always liked about him was that his characters always had an amazing and engaging personality. Very charismatic and loads of charm. But, to me he always came across as genuine, never phony or 'put on' in any way. Decidedly, one of my very favourites.

The story is quite good too. I normally don't leave reviews for non-Genre films, for movies that are not usually Horror or Science Fiction, but this movie has always been one that I liked from the very first time I saw it. The performances are unusually and universally very good, which is one reason I feel that this movie really stands out for it's time. In addition to Coburn, each and every one of the other supporting actors were excellent! The girlfriend I really liked. I felt that she came across rather uniquely for women portrayed during that time. She had a perfect blend of femininity, intelligence, and humour that really worked and made her character very appealing, and thus the attraction between them very believable. And each and every one, even the very small bit players, played their parts to perfection. Even the film developer guy for his two minutes was great.

I could go on and on and on about each character and how well they were portrayed, but the main point here as I stated at the beginning, is that this movie shows how a very gifted director can draw out amazing performances from his actors. And, this he did extremely well, which along with the very engaging and well written story, in my lowly and wretched opinion, makes for a fun and very entertaining film! I just have to put in one last plug for Coburn... I mean, NOBODY could deliver lines the way he did.

I need to double check and I might very well be wrong here, but I THINK Blake Edwards was known for the Pink Panther films, right? But, this movie here shows truly what a master he was at brining a good Mystery/Thriller to life in a way I feel really shows his ability as an excellent director. An great example of this is the scene between the girls uncle who is a doctor and Coburn. To me, Drama is the most difficult to pull off in a movie without seeming either plastic or over the top. But, that scene between the two of them involves a whole spectrum of emotions, subtlety, humour, candor, and intensity that I feel was done masterfully.

Most HIGHLY recommended!

Controversial Subject Matter (abortion) is at the Heart of this also Controversial Film that had Director Blake Edwards threatening to Walk, but His Cooler side prevailed against pointed Threats by the Studio and He Finished the Film (then walked).

Constant Studio Interference was the problem. Fearing "Something" with the Hot Topic in 1972 the Movie was Tweaked and turned Tepid (or so the Studio thought). It still has enough Impact to deliver its Message about "Back Alley Abortions" and is Not a Bad Mystery/Thriller helped by the No Nonsense Actor James Coburn playing a No Nonsense Character.

Not Everything Works to perfection in the Picture. The required Love Interest has a Clunky and Dated feel and doesn't do anything to Enhance the Plot, in Fact it's a Drag. But otherwise there are some Good Characters and the Lines between Hero and Villain are Realistically Rendered.

It's a Forgotten Film and Deserves a Retro Re-Consideration considering the Subject and the more than Competent Professionals at Work here. Above Average and Thick with Timeless and Topical Considerations.

James Coburn makes an (initially) likable hero, Jennifer O'Neill is radiantly pretty and Blake Edwards proves to be surprisingly adept at handling the "serious" material, quite a change-of-pace for him after all the "Pink Panther" entries. But the film becomes bloody and unpleasant in the last 20 minutes, and near the climax it features a particularly distasteful, almost repulsive torture scene. (**1/2)

James Coburn plays a pathologist who is investigating the death of the fifteen-year-old daughter of the chief of medicine, who has died of a botched abortion that has been blamed on his colleague (James Hong), who is an illegal abortionist on the side. A lot of people today would be horrified of a movie where the hero is actually trying to help out an abortion doctor. But this was 1972 and people tend to forget that everything wasn't all bright and wonderful back when abortion was still illegal either (I don't personally take a side on the abortion debate, but I have a problem with people on either side who think the issue is in any way morally clear-cut and unambiguous--it's not now and never was). But before anyone goes bemoaning "liberal Hollywood", there's also a real "Dirty Harry" element to this movie, like a scene where Coburn essentially tortures information out of a drug-addicted suspect by denying her treatment. This particular scene should offend liberals everywhere (as well as anyone else who's ever heard of the Hyppocratic Oath).

But the fact that this movie might offend both conservatives AND liberals is exactly what I liked about it. The real world is morally messy and no one person is ever 100 percent morally righteous, and the many, many Hollywood movies that try to make things morally simplistic and their protagonists morally pure actually do a great disservice in many ways. Of course, the moral complications in this particular movie seem to be more the result of a confused production than anyone's clever intentions. Still I always find an interesting failure like this much more enjoyable than a boring success (like whatever old TV show they're making into a major motion picture this week). And in 1970's Hollywood there was a whole string of these kind of interesting failures, which is why I find that whole period so fascinating.

This movie definitely has some problems as other have said. Jennifer O'Neil is completely wasted, and the basic plot is riddled with holes (i.e. noboby but the protagonist notices that the botched operation was very obviously not the work of a trained doctor). Coburn isn't bad though, and this movie does kind of anticipate both "Coma" and the popular TV series "Quincy MD". Not good, but interesting, and certainly worth seeing.

I read that after Blake Edwards (The Pink Panther movies) turned this movie in some suit completely recut it. I can believe it. Sometimes it seems that the action sequences or suspenseful sequences are cut so as to reduce the excitement or suspense, that the set has just enough color so as not to be monochromatic, but is not lit so that the colorfulness of the set in some scenes (and the lack of it in other scenes) does not reinforce any emotion or theme in the movie. James Coburn puts on his super-cool persona, and that's fun to watch, but a super-cool pathologist is as common as a super-cool law librarian. Jennifer O'Neill is gorgeous and eminently watchable, but the way her romance is written, she must be very easy; no way. Michael Crichton (The Andromeda Strain writer, Westworld director) wrote the book on which the movie is based, and hid his name somewhere in the process like Edwards did. Quality writers John D.F. Black (Shaft) and the writing team of Harriet Frank, Jr. and Irving Ravetch (Norma Rae) worked on this, then hid their names. Many hospital drama tropes that are old hat now were fresh then, and that's fun. Should not be your first choice,except maybe to gaze at Jennifer O'Neill- better choices: Blake Edwards- Pink Panther, James Coburn- Magnificent Seven, Michael Crichton medical- Andromeda Strain, nonmedical Westworld.

It's clear that Dr. Peter Carey (James Coburn) could've done just as well as a detective as he did as a doctor.

When a young teenage socialite dies from hemoraging from a botched abortion Dr. David Tao (James Hong) is fingered. He has no advocate besides Dr. Carey and he couldn't be luckier. Dr. Carey spends the rest of the movie seeking to find the truth. What he finds is a lot more in-depth than a simple botched abortion.

Abortion is a theme, but it isn't the central theme. The movie doesn't go into long arguments for or against abortion though Dr. Tao briefly mentions his motivation for doing abortions. So, if you are a strong believer for or against it, don't shy away because of potential philosophizing about the issue. A murder mystery is what this is and a pretty good one.

James Coburn is a doctor trying to help another doctor who's accused of a botched abortion that results in a death in "The Carey Treatment," a 1972 film that also stars Jennifer O'Neill, Pat Hingle, James Hong, Ed Herlihy, and Skye Aubrey.

The movie was made on location, using a lot of exteriors of Mass General Hospital. The inside of the hospital looked very familiar as well, but it's been so many years, I couldn't place it. Having lived in Boston at one time, it was great to see all all of the location shots.

The daughter of a hospital benefactor dies at 15 from a botched abortion, and a doctor who secretly performs abortions (Hong) because he's opposed to wire hangers is accused. His pathologist friend, Carey, a newcomer to the hospital, investigates, and the case takes another direction.

The story is interesting but not very well done. There's a very late '60s, early '70s feel to the film (naturally, since that's when it was made) - but the plot, involving the abortion scenario, is dated as well. Coburn's character is also the flip, hip type that was prevalent at that time, embodied by someone like Peter Lawford.

The beautiful Jennifer O'Neill is Carey's love interest, and she's fairly dreadful. She has a habit of really hitting a certain word in a sentence hard. "And the THINGS that I do..." "WHAT'S wrong" - once you become aware of it, it BECOMES very distracting.

There was also one hole in the plot that wasn't explained - the young girl as she was dying apparently names the Hong character as her abortionist, according to her mother. I don't want to give anything away, but I'd love to know what all of that was about. The mention of that seemed like an excuse for Carey to visit a stereotypical character with whom he could be flip - the drunken socialite. It served no other purpose. This movie really doesn't either.

Dr. Peter Carey (James Coburn) is the new pathologist at a Boston hospital. He falls for Georgia Hightower (Jennifer O'Neill). Dr. David Tao (James Hong) calls him from prison when Karen Randall dies in emergency. Karen is the Chief of Staff J.D. Randall's daughter and she bled to death after an illegal abortion. However Tao claims he only treated her in emergency and didn't do the abortion even though he's done them in the past. Carey investigates which puts Randall and the police against him.

The investigation is meandering and stalls several time. I like the setup but the follow through is deficient. The pathologist investigator genre has come a long way since then. Any number of TV show is better than this. However it moves just well enough despite some rather slow patches.

Dr Carey seemed like an interesting character to start with but ends up being too superficially written. He first looks more like a buoyant playboy then it quickly appears he is more interested in settling down at the same time as he jumps on the opportunity to investigate a case all by himself rather than just helping the police. Or maybe he is falling in love but doesn't want to show it. Either way it is sadly a badly written character.

I don't know if Blake Edwards later elaborated on the constant studio interference but this should have been deeply re-written before going into production. For all his action coolness James Coburn cannot be credible as a love interest... or he is really badly directed here as to appear detached when dating.

On top of that the investigation he leads is quite boring. Cardinal mistake: the viewer is one step ahead of him as the storyline meanders before he decides to confront the next person of interest. Very sloppily written again: the interrogation of the mother-in-law flutters while it had the goods to be a great scene; the interrogation of the coed is very cringe-worthy. And then all is reveals in a speedy confession at the end. As one reviewer mentioned: be prepared to rewind to get the details!

Botton-line: not very convincing thriller despite disparate assets (James Coburn who could have been better as an actual draft for House MD, Jennifer O'Neal, abortion depending on doctors' convictions, managing a medical institution for profit...).

Fortunately Michael Crichton learned from this and delivered a great thriller on the same grounds with Coma 6 years later.

This film is a bit of a puzzlement. Parts of it have a made-for-TV feel, some of it is quite entertaining, and some of it is odd and a bit disturbing. Some might find that interesting in a "something for everybody" sort of way, but to me the weirdness works against it.

The basic premise is a west-coast Doctor Carey, played by James Coburn, decides to make a move in his life to be a pathologist at a large Boston hospital. We first see Carey arriving, then settling into his job. He also manages to start a relationship with pretty Jennifer O'Neill. He is happy that several friends and associates from his past, including Dr. Tao, are also working at the hospital. The chief surgeon is the arrogant Dr. JD Randall , who is very good and takes the hardest cases. In passing, Carey meets Dr. Randall's young daughter, Karen.

Not too much later, Karen Randall ends up being brought into the very same hospital by ambulance, appearing to be bleeding to death from a botched abortion. The girl dies, and Carey learns that his friend Dr. Tao has been arrested for performing an abortion on the underaged girl. Carey visits Tao in jail and Tao admits to doing abortions to help young girls in a bind, but he didn't perform this one. Carey offers to help solve this mystery and save his friend from prison, setting off the next part of the film into a mildly interesting whodunit.

Underaged girls dying from botched abortions is rather strong stuff for a 1972 movie, back when abortions were illegal and before the whole thing became a political football. In fact, most characters portrayed here don't exactly have a good impression of the whole thing, which is rather refreshing. However, from this point forward, there is a lot of strangeness to the movie.

There are some uncomfortable portrayals and dialogs from the young girls in the film. During the autopsy of Randall's daughter, the film keeps flashing to this young girl bouncing around the beach in a bikini as her dead body is worked on. Carey talks to her school room mate, who doesn't particularly seem upset at Karen's death, and then discusses what a slut Karen was...."threesomes, foursome, and more! She'd do anything..." Carey frightens her into admitting that she was talking about herself, and not Randall.

The movie seems fixated on sex, which is disturbing in a film about botched abortions and death. Throw in a torture sequence to get a confession out of someone, and even a homoerotic rubdown sequence and you begin to get an idea of how truly weird the movie is.

The other part that bothered me is that no one seemed to care about the dead girl but Carey. Her dad just continues to work, the uncle just focuses on cooking, and the stepmom is simply a snarky narcissist. Maybe this in and of itself is trying to say something about the lack of care in all kinds of death, I am not sure.

Worth a look if you are really bored, but don't say I didn't warn you!

The Carey Treatment dealing with a neuralgic matter as illegal abo.rtion, the recently hired pathologist Dr. Peter Carey (Coburn) from California arriving in Boston's hospital meeting an old fellow work the skilled Surgeon David Tao (James Wong) who introduces him at whole crew and how the things works there, mainly the Surgeon-big Boss-Patron Dr. Randall and finally the gorgeous nutritionist Giorgia (Jennifer O'Neill) which he has a sudden affair.

Then came up the unexpected when Dr. Randall's teenager daughter went to die by a wrong procedure of illegal abo.rtion, then the guilty falls upon the shoulders of Dr. Tao a hidden abortionist who does such thing for humanity reasons and charging it at lowest coasts only, he is indicted and arrested at jail just waiting for a heavy sentence, thus Dr. Tao asking for help of Dr. Carrey claiming innocence, after many researching Dr. Carey finds out that such girl was never pregnancy, it has a twist in the case and whoever made this wrong procedure has Dr. Carrey at your crosshairs.

Irregular thriller-crime, many farfetched sequences as car speed to enforce a girl to talk and a hard criticism on the health system implying an overprice whichever a simpler procedure, also James Coburn is too neglectful at your duty as pathologist almost forgetting his early agreement to accepting a job, in other hand an absorbing picture anyhow.

Thanks for reading.

Resume:

First watch: 1989 / How many: 2 / Source: TV-DVD / Rating: 7.

Because it is. Based on the novel "A Case of Need" by Jeffery Hudson, this film only took a few frames for me to opine that it seemed a lot like a Michael Crichton story. Of course Hudson is Crichton's pseudonym, and the film proceeds in the thriller/mystery mode of many of its author's more famous efforts.

Despite a lot of heavy themes and cliched or stereotypical intimidating "doctor-as-god" and above everyone else tropes, the plot turns on a much more banal matter. And of course, not only is Coburn above it all as a pathologist, he is apparently the only one seriously interested in investigating the death of a poor young woman and exonerating a wrongly accused colleague. He's awfully good at his sideline, too. There's a couple of too-convenient coincidences to stitch the story together, putting this squarely in the average mass of just OK mysteries. But if you're sentimental for a dose of late 1960s-early 1970s hip doctor worship (back when the doctor-image was of cutting at 11 am, teeing off at 1 pm, and partying all night with gorgeous hospital staff at jazz and booze-filled parties, and not being bogged down in insurance reimbursement forms as they complain of today), then this is a film to depart to that (real or imagined) nostalgia of 50 years ago.

James Coburn is his dependably irrepressible and ever-toothy, shaggy self. Watching Jennifer O'Neill made me ask, "whatever happened to her?" Skye Aubrey (Nurse Angela) seemed so familiar but I couldn't really place her in any other memorable roles-maybe soap opera or the Love Boat?

It might be interesting to compare this film to the "what if" version had Blake Edwards had full or at least more control over it. Apparently the shooting schedule was curtailed, and the film edited, against his wishes. Even so, I'm not sure that added runtime, for example, is indicated, because the film, which is really a pastiche of medico/detective/procedural vignettes tethered to the basic plot line, seems not to need any additional plot points to complete the story arc. And at its final 101 minutes, it doesn't detain to boredom.