9 reviews
Chances are, if you're reading this, you've already seen the first two installments or have a vague idea of what The Yakuza Papers are all about. Battles without Honor and Humanity. That sums up the yakuza lifestyle pretty well, and even though I haven't done any research on the actual yakuza, there's a palpable sense of gritty realism in Fukasaku's crime sagas that is very convincing.
Proxy War is another chapter in the long series of betrayal, scheming and chaos among the rival families of Hiroshima. Alliances are formed only to be broken the next second and rival parties are renonciled only to go at it again the next day. Without going into much details, Proxy War details the chronicles that led to the Hiroshima battle between the Yamamori and the Akashi families in the early 60's. There's a semblance of honor among thieves here, but it's just a semblance. These people lack the warped sense of honor and loyalty the Cosa Nostra had. As Hirono says, "he just wants a safe ground to stand". The same could be said for all of them.
Once again, Bunta Sugawara steals the show as Shizo Hirono, and there's also a welcome cameo by the beautiful Reiko Ike (a pinku regular). There's not as much blood as in previous installments, but when violence erupts, you feel it. Fukasaku's direction is solid and keeps the convoluted plot going on a steady pace. The fights and shootings are gritty and raw, there's no Guy Ritchie glamour or glorified violence here. It kind of reminds me of the urban guerilla film-making of a Cassavetes or Mean Streets-era Scorsese. Coupled with a haunting score, and great performances all around, PW doesn't dissappoint.
There's a semblance of honor among thieves here, but it's just a semblance. These people lack the warped sense of honor and loyalty the Cosa Nostra had. As Hirono says, "he just wants a safe ground to stand". The same could be said for all of them.
My only gripe is, that plot-wise, there's no counter-balance to the scheming and back stabbing. Unlike The Godfather and other crime epics about the Italian mob, we never get to see the criminal side of the Yakuza. Money-laundering, smuggling, drug trafficking, prostitution, they're the bread and butter of any self respecting mob. Yet we never get a glimpse of that world in The Yakuza Papers. And if the unrelenting violence and interesting plot were enough to make the first two installments amazing, it gets repetitive here. People gather around tables to discuss their plans, form alliances, break alliances and that's it for most of the time. IMO it would be more interesting if the two aspects were combined. As it is, it feel kind of incomplete. The Akashi family, for example, butt in to help Uchimoto, but it's obvious that apart from defending the honor of their sworn brother, in the same time, it serves as a way of getting in the Hiroshima underworld. Yet we never witness what makes said underworld a place worth risking their men over.
All in all, this is strongly recommended to people who enjoyed the first parts of the series. If you're a newcomer, start with the first one. The plot, characters and motivations will make more sense. And you'll know by the point you reach Proxy War, if this is your cup of tea or not.
Proxy War is another chapter in the long series of betrayal, scheming and chaos among the rival families of Hiroshima. Alliances are formed only to be broken the next second and rival parties are renonciled only to go at it again the next day. Without going into much details, Proxy War details the chronicles that led to the Hiroshima battle between the Yamamori and the Akashi families in the early 60's. There's a semblance of honor among thieves here, but it's just a semblance. These people lack the warped sense of honor and loyalty the Cosa Nostra had. As Hirono says, "he just wants a safe ground to stand". The same could be said for all of them.
Once again, Bunta Sugawara steals the show as Shizo Hirono, and there's also a welcome cameo by the beautiful Reiko Ike (a pinku regular). There's not as much blood as in previous installments, but when violence erupts, you feel it. Fukasaku's direction is solid and keeps the convoluted plot going on a steady pace. The fights and shootings are gritty and raw, there's no Guy Ritchie glamour or glorified violence here. It kind of reminds me of the urban guerilla film-making of a Cassavetes or Mean Streets-era Scorsese. Coupled with a haunting score, and great performances all around, PW doesn't dissappoint.
There's a semblance of honor among thieves here, but it's just a semblance. These people lack the warped sense of honor and loyalty the Cosa Nostra had. As Hirono says, "he just wants a safe ground to stand". The same could be said for all of them.
My only gripe is, that plot-wise, there's no counter-balance to the scheming and back stabbing. Unlike The Godfather and other crime epics about the Italian mob, we never get to see the criminal side of the Yakuza. Money-laundering, smuggling, drug trafficking, prostitution, they're the bread and butter of any self respecting mob. Yet we never get a glimpse of that world in The Yakuza Papers. And if the unrelenting violence and interesting plot were enough to make the first two installments amazing, it gets repetitive here. People gather around tables to discuss their plans, form alliances, break alliances and that's it for most of the time. IMO it would be more interesting if the two aspects were combined. As it is, it feel kind of incomplete. The Akashi family, for example, butt in to help Uchimoto, but it's obvious that apart from defending the honor of their sworn brother, in the same time, it serves as a way of getting in the Hiroshima underworld. Yet we never witness what makes said underworld a place worth risking their men over.
All in all, this is strongly recommended to people who enjoyed the first parts of the series. If you're a newcomer, start with the first one. The plot, characters and motivations will make more sense. And you'll know by the point you reach Proxy War, if this is your cup of tea or not.
- chaosrampant
- Jan 3, 2008
- Permalink
Third in the series, Battles Without Honour & Humanity and even more confusing than the first two. Those were interesting and involving enough to persist, especially with the historic background but here it seems to be just one 'battle' after another. Admittedly the fights are bloody and violent enough but the constant references to duty and family and honour and betrayal is very waring. I found it difficult to keep up with all the inter family struggles and very soon gave up trying.
- christopher-underwood
- Jan 11, 2020
- Permalink
The third film in Kinji Fukasaku's unremitting, sprawling, epic yakuza series, made up of five films shot in Japan between 1973 and 1974. The first film, BATTLES WITHOUT HONOR AND HUMANITY, I thought was pretty good, but a bit confusingly plotted which worked against it. The sequel, Hiroshima Death Match, was excellent in its plotting of Sonny Chiba and his grudge match and a big improvement over the first.
PROXY WAR is a slight step down from Hiroshima Death Match, but only slight. This is an effective tale that draws you deep into the yakuza underworld as it explores rivalry between various factions and the sort of violent, day-to-day incidents that make up gangster warfare. I found that series lead Bunta Sugawara had a much clearer role this time around, and gets to do plenty of quality acting as the conflicted, hard-headed man of violence.
As is the norm with this series, Fukasaku's production values are top notch and the pace is lightning fast. I particularly liked the vignettes of non-stop violence that reveal the brutality of yakuza warfare. The supporting, all-star cast is exemplary and PROXY WAR makes a particular effort with the characterisation this time around so that the heads of the families and the underbosses are no longer just names and faces but living, breathing people. I look forward to the fourth instalment, POLICE TACTICS.
PROXY WAR is a slight step down from Hiroshima Death Match, but only slight. This is an effective tale that draws you deep into the yakuza underworld as it explores rivalry between various factions and the sort of violent, day-to-day incidents that make up gangster warfare. I found that series lead Bunta Sugawara had a much clearer role this time around, and gets to do plenty of quality acting as the conflicted, hard-headed man of violence.
As is the norm with this series, Fukasaku's production values are top notch and the pace is lightning fast. I particularly liked the vignettes of non-stop violence that reveal the brutality of yakuza warfare. The supporting, all-star cast is exemplary and PROXY WAR makes a particular effort with the characterisation this time around so that the heads of the families and the underbosses are no longer just names and faces but living, breathing people. I look forward to the fourth instalment, POLICE TACTICS.
- Leofwine_draca
- May 29, 2016
- Permalink
- morrison-dylan-fan
- Aug 8, 2020
- Permalink
Stumbles in ways the first two didn't, and so easily is my least favourite entry in this series so far... but that being said, it's still pretty good.
While the Yazuza Papers films are often hard to follow, at least with the first two I understood the different sides of the conflicts, and could identify a handful of important individuals. This one really expands things and has far more names to remember. As far as I can tell, it also has more factions, and also more areas to keep track of, as geographically, things also feel like they expand.
I struggled to keep up, but it may be because I watched an unfortunately edited version? It was an offical bluray release, but it ran at about 102 minutes instead of the nearly two-hour runtime listed here. Perhaps the extra 15-ish minutes would make things more clear, if you happen to find the longer version.
I still liked the film's style of course, as well as the handheld camerawork and the crazy bursts of violence. The intrigue I could understand was neat, and I stayed engaged by wondering about whether the protagonist was actually in control of what he was doing, or just pretending he was and consistently panicking internally at the insanity around him.
It ends well too, and in a way that got me excited to see parts 4 and 5, so despite this being a slight misstep, hopefully the rest of the series is onward, upward, and unedited!
While the Yazuza Papers films are often hard to follow, at least with the first two I understood the different sides of the conflicts, and could identify a handful of important individuals. This one really expands things and has far more names to remember. As far as I can tell, it also has more factions, and also more areas to keep track of, as geographically, things also feel like they expand.
I struggled to keep up, but it may be because I watched an unfortunately edited version? It was an offical bluray release, but it ran at about 102 minutes instead of the nearly two-hour runtime listed here. Perhaps the extra 15-ish minutes would make things more clear, if you happen to find the longer version.
I still liked the film's style of course, as well as the handheld camerawork and the crazy bursts of violence. The intrigue I could understand was neat, and I stayed engaged by wondering about whether the protagonist was actually in control of what he was doing, or just pretending he was and consistently panicking internally at the insanity around him.
It ends well too, and in a way that got me excited to see parts 4 and 5, so despite this being a slight misstep, hopefully the rest of the series is onward, upward, and unedited!
- Jeremy_Urquhart
- Oct 8, 2021
- Permalink
- mihokonluke
- Dec 14, 2021
- Permalink
- jimniexperience
- Apr 20, 2018
- Permalink
To read of the production history, one gets a sense that this time around returning screenwriter Kasahara Kazuo had an even more difficult time arranging the source material and history into a form that was workable for cinematic storytelling, and even the process of filming may have had its share of issues. How might this impact the third entry in the 'Battles without honor and humanity series,' this coming five months after its immediate predecessor and eight months after the progenitor was released? Given the harried, chaotic feel of both the storytelling and film-making of the first installment, and the slightly more refined nature of the second - in my mind arguably translating into a slightly less vibrant and more conventional product, if generally just as worthy - how would 'Proxy war' be approached? What similarities would it share, and how would it stack up? I don't think it takes long before we start to get our answer, and while this third picture broaches the same subject matter, carries the same broad vibes, and boasts all the same fundamental elements in some measure, I also think it's evident that it follows the trend we saw with 'Deadly fight in Hiroshima': rather than embrace all the rough edges, many are smoothed over to facilitate a more cohesive narrative. That in itself doesn't specifically mean that this piece is any better or worse, but whatever one's opinion, it does mean that it's an additional step away from what made the original of January 1973 so intoxicating and extraordinary.
It remains true, if to a lesser extent, that the concrete plot, following a few specific yakuza families and individuals, is deemphasized in favor of giving a wide, long-view perspective of yakuza life and activity: bursts of graphic violence amidst constant feuding and shifts of power, position, and territory. As such, there is not so much concern here for how easy or hard the tale is to follow as might be true for cinema at large. On the other hand, this feature further significantly tempers the violence, pacing, and freneticism of before in an effort to bring a more straightforward, tangibly unified plot to bear; heavy-handedly accentuating the point, exposition and some dialogue needlessly hammer on the idea of the gangland wars in Hiroshima mirroring growing unrest around the globe, including proxy conflicts such as those between the United States and Soviet Union. Rest assured that we do get the big stunts, effects, bloodshed, and otherwise action sequences that we have before - but far more sparingly, and with less of the panache that characterized them five months before, let alone eight months before. Fukasaku Kinji's direction is reliably solid in guiding the production, and likewise, as cinematographer Yoshida Sadaji returns and Horiike Kozo replaces previous editor Miyamoto Shintaro, their contributions are splendidly sharp. All the same, some portion of the initial vitality is lost, including even in how the action is shot. One might reasonably say that it's only at the climax, within the last ten minutes, that this most closely resembles the earlier works.
The cast give swell, well-rounded performances, with all the principal stars returning; all those behind the scenes turn in superb work including sets, costume design, and hair and makeup. The music of returning composer Tsushima Toshiaki remains delightfully flavorful complement. The active narrative is ably rounded out one more by tidbits of narration, on-screen text, and instances of still images and graphics that serve to provide context and advance the narrative more concisely. And still: for all the skill and intelligence that went into this title, something is missing. The wild energy of the first movie is almost absent; the more carefully crafted dramatic sensibilities and impact of the second movie are painted over in dull hues. That narration, text, and still imagery seems overly abundant, distracting from the proceedings more than adding to it. Just as the violence is pushed to smaller corners, so is there also a strange dearth of urgency and import in the storytelling, and in its execution. The tale is duly interesting, but it is mostly rendered with a soft, bland tone that approaches casual indifference - and as plot development in the drama predominantly depends so, so much on quiet scenes of dialogue, this is very bad news in terms of the installment's overall success. Some moments are instead almost parodical, but for lack of any zest leave no mark; all told the film may be well made, but it struggles to make much of an impression. For as fine as 'Proxy war' is at its best, and for all that it has in common with its antecedents, to be frank it comes off as a decidedly weaker imitation.
The end result is a viewing experience that doesn't particularly command our attention; for all our expectations, engagement becomes passive. Taken in stride with its elder brethren this flick is unquestionably a step down, or maybe even two steps down, and kind of disappointing; considered on its own, it won't necessarily stand out in a crowd. I don't think this third 'Battles without honor and humanity' is altogether bad. I think that for as much as it tries to join the company of the progenitor and first sequel, it's only a pale shade, and maybe the reported difficulties of the production - namely, Kasahara's toils and troubles in devising the screenplay - were even more severe than they read on paper. In concept this is kith and kin with its forebears; in conjuration and in execution, it's a plodding, somewhat tedious simulacrum that can claim only slivers of the same value. I'm glad for those who get more out of it than I do, and I maintain that it's better than not; to one degree or another worth watching both on its own merits and as part of the ongoing series. For as much as 'Proxy war' saps away our enthusiasm, however, I also wonder if one isn't better off watching only Fukasaku's original, and not even bothering with the remainder. I want to like it more than I do, but then, maybe as it is I'm being too kind in my assessment.
It remains true, if to a lesser extent, that the concrete plot, following a few specific yakuza families and individuals, is deemphasized in favor of giving a wide, long-view perspective of yakuza life and activity: bursts of graphic violence amidst constant feuding and shifts of power, position, and territory. As such, there is not so much concern here for how easy or hard the tale is to follow as might be true for cinema at large. On the other hand, this feature further significantly tempers the violence, pacing, and freneticism of before in an effort to bring a more straightforward, tangibly unified plot to bear; heavy-handedly accentuating the point, exposition and some dialogue needlessly hammer on the idea of the gangland wars in Hiroshima mirroring growing unrest around the globe, including proxy conflicts such as those between the United States and Soviet Union. Rest assured that we do get the big stunts, effects, bloodshed, and otherwise action sequences that we have before - but far more sparingly, and with less of the panache that characterized them five months before, let alone eight months before. Fukasaku Kinji's direction is reliably solid in guiding the production, and likewise, as cinematographer Yoshida Sadaji returns and Horiike Kozo replaces previous editor Miyamoto Shintaro, their contributions are splendidly sharp. All the same, some portion of the initial vitality is lost, including even in how the action is shot. One might reasonably say that it's only at the climax, within the last ten minutes, that this most closely resembles the earlier works.
The cast give swell, well-rounded performances, with all the principal stars returning; all those behind the scenes turn in superb work including sets, costume design, and hair and makeup. The music of returning composer Tsushima Toshiaki remains delightfully flavorful complement. The active narrative is ably rounded out one more by tidbits of narration, on-screen text, and instances of still images and graphics that serve to provide context and advance the narrative more concisely. And still: for all the skill and intelligence that went into this title, something is missing. The wild energy of the first movie is almost absent; the more carefully crafted dramatic sensibilities and impact of the second movie are painted over in dull hues. That narration, text, and still imagery seems overly abundant, distracting from the proceedings more than adding to it. Just as the violence is pushed to smaller corners, so is there also a strange dearth of urgency and import in the storytelling, and in its execution. The tale is duly interesting, but it is mostly rendered with a soft, bland tone that approaches casual indifference - and as plot development in the drama predominantly depends so, so much on quiet scenes of dialogue, this is very bad news in terms of the installment's overall success. Some moments are instead almost parodical, but for lack of any zest leave no mark; all told the film may be well made, but it struggles to make much of an impression. For as fine as 'Proxy war' is at its best, and for all that it has in common with its antecedents, to be frank it comes off as a decidedly weaker imitation.
The end result is a viewing experience that doesn't particularly command our attention; for all our expectations, engagement becomes passive. Taken in stride with its elder brethren this flick is unquestionably a step down, or maybe even two steps down, and kind of disappointing; considered on its own, it won't necessarily stand out in a crowd. I don't think this third 'Battles without honor and humanity' is altogether bad. I think that for as much as it tries to join the company of the progenitor and first sequel, it's only a pale shade, and maybe the reported difficulties of the production - namely, Kasahara's toils and troubles in devising the screenplay - were even more severe than they read on paper. In concept this is kith and kin with its forebears; in conjuration and in execution, it's a plodding, somewhat tedious simulacrum that can claim only slivers of the same value. I'm glad for those who get more out of it than I do, and I maintain that it's better than not; to one degree or another worth watching both on its own merits and as part of the ongoing series. For as much as 'Proxy war' saps away our enthusiasm, however, I also wonder if one isn't better off watching only Fukasaku's original, and not even bothering with the remainder. I want to like it more than I do, but then, maybe as it is I'm being too kind in my assessment.
- I_Ailurophile
- Jun 22, 2024
- Permalink