6 reviews
- jaydoubleu
- Nov 18, 2002
- Permalink
There's just something about porn in the 80s and 70s that is much more appealing than modern porn films. The story lines were actually given some thought to and the sex is just so much more realistic. You don't get the pumped up breasts and muscle bound guys who bonk for hours and hours like you get today, which quite frankly bores me no end. Back in the olden days, you get "normal" people acting in porn...attractive genuine women and average guys (skinny mostly with average penises) having sex in real life times ie 20 seconds to about 3 mins (yes it is only that long whether you want to admit it or not!). So this film offers a lot of that and I find it a lot more arousing than most porn that I've seen.
My market share is rapidly falling due to seeing terrible movies like STOCKS AND BLONDES! Our beautiful financial figure named Wanda shows off whatever it takes to become a success story. What story? It's just uninteresting, unworthy, and unadmirable, and to "top it all off", it doesn't exist. Good thing this one is cut from any thermometer-exploding scenes, and I can still care less. This is an exploitation comedy that gives itself a bad name, creating a deep hole into the domestic economy. The video distributors from the past lost millions of dollars for putting out movies like this. It's a great find if you like your women totally bare.
- Nodriesrespect
- Jan 8, 2008
- Permalink
- Woodyanders
- Dec 10, 2014
- Permalink