A community of magical shape-shifting raccoon dogs struggle to prevent their forest home from being destroyed by urban development.A community of magical shape-shifting raccoon dogs struggle to prevent their forest home from being destroyed by urban development.A community of magical shape-shifting raccoon dogs struggle to prevent their forest home from being destroyed by urban development.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 1 nomination
Shinchô Kokontei
- Narrator
- (voice)
Makoto Nonomura
- Shôkichi
- (voice)
Yuriko Ishida
- Okiyo
- (voice)
Norihei Miki
- Seizaemon
- (voice)
Shigeru Izumiya
- Gonta
- (voice)
Takehiro Murata
- Bunta
- (voice)
Beichô Katsura
- Kinchô Daimyôjin the Sixth
- (voice)
- (as Beichou Katsura)
Bunshi Katsura VI
- Yashimano Hage
- (voice)
- (as Bunshi Katsura)
Akira Kamiya
- Tamasaburô
- (voice)
Tomokazu Seki
- Male Tanuki B
- (voice)
Megumi Hayashibara
- Sasuke
- (voice)
Rin Mizuhara
- Ofuku
- (voice)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaOfficial submission of Japan for the 'Best Foreign Language Film' category of the 67th Academy Awards in 1995.
- GoofsThe English-dubbed version incorrectly refers to the tanuki as "raccoons". Tanuki are actually "raccoon dogs" - they are in the canid branch of mammals.
- Alternate versionsThe English dubbed version censors all references to testicles.
- ConnectionsFeatured in AMV Hell 3: The Motion Picture (2005)
- SoundtracksAjia no Kono Machi de
(In this Town of Asia)
Lyrics by Kôryû
Music by Yôko Ono
Vocals & Performance by Shang Shang Typhoon
Featured review
I find it hard to summarize this film, since it is sort of all over the place. The main plot of the film involves the tanuki (raccoon-dogs) of the Tama hills near Tokyo and their struggle against the encroaching development that is destroying their woods. As the tanuki attempt to defend their home through the use of their shape-shifting abilities, they are also challenged by an inability to agree on the best course of action and a growing sense that their efforts may be inevitably doomed to failure.
The film, like its tanuki characters, seemed a bit unfocused at times, especially towards the end. Indeed, the plot mainly served as a set-up for showing a succession tanuki antics. Admittedly, said antics were very entertaining, but at 2 hours of runtime I'd prefer a little more narrative support.
Some have referred to this movie as environmentalist in nature, but viewed from that standpoint, it is actually somewhat weak. I was especially disappointed by the ending, which I thought failed to make any meaningful comment on the sequence of events depicted in the movie. Without giving too much away, it seemed like the movie was saying, "Development and urban sprawl are inevitable, but oh well. At least there are still golf courses and parks!" It was as if the people making the film didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings. I have nothing against ambiguity, especially with such a broad theme as the conflict between humans and nature, but I thought the overall effect of the film was wishy-washy, avoiding more serious questions for the sake of preserving a lighthearted tone.
The best aspects of this film in my opinion were its unrestrained playfulness, wacky sense of humor, and use of Japanese culture and folklore, much of which was largely unfamiliar to me as a Western viewer. The art and animation were also quite well done, with realistic natural elements rendered quite convincingly and an overall visual harmony between the static backgrounds and animated figures. Despite the shortcomings mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, I enjoyed this film quite a bit. 7 / 10.
The film, like its tanuki characters, seemed a bit unfocused at times, especially towards the end. Indeed, the plot mainly served as a set-up for showing a succession tanuki antics. Admittedly, said antics were very entertaining, but at 2 hours of runtime I'd prefer a little more narrative support.
Some have referred to this movie as environmentalist in nature, but viewed from that standpoint, it is actually somewhat weak. I was especially disappointed by the ending, which I thought failed to make any meaningful comment on the sequence of events depicted in the movie. Without giving too much away, it seemed like the movie was saying, "Development and urban sprawl are inevitable, but oh well. At least there are still golf courses and parks!" It was as if the people making the film didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings. I have nothing against ambiguity, especially with such a broad theme as the conflict between humans and nature, but I thought the overall effect of the film was wishy-washy, avoiding more serious questions for the sake of preserving a lighthearted tone.
The best aspects of this film in my opinion were its unrestrained playfulness, wacky sense of humor, and use of Japanese culture and folklore, much of which was largely unfamiliar to me as a Western viewer. The art and animation were also quite well done, with realistic natural elements rendered quite convincingly and an overall visual harmony between the static backgrounds and animated figures. Despite the shortcomings mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, I enjoyed this film quite a bit. 7 / 10.
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $372,405
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $107,909
- Jun 17, 2018
- Gross worldwide
- $1,279,218
- Runtime1 hour 59 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content