7 reviews
This movie was really bad, I think that the title fooled me because I thought that there would be at least more vampire call girls and more of a vampire acting but what I got was a bunch of boring sex scenes including a girl straddling a washing machine while some goof with glasses watches through a peep hole, a lady at a club watching the most horrible band in the world play with a guy playing a guitar with only one note and then she takes him back stage, or vice versa and straddles the guy. Then there's the red neck who gets ripped off by one of the call girls and goes after her at the head call girl's house and asks for his money back and they all seduce him instead. This movie was nothing but a compilation of lame skits, terrible acting and left overs from last years copy of Hustler and thats it.
Once in a while or in some situations once in a lifetime a role pops up in a movie that is a perfect fit for a performer. Such is the case in this movie as the role of Roxy fits the persona of the actress/ professional dominatrix Lilith Stabs. She looks immaculate in her unique black & white hair, her flawless pale complexion & her fetish clothing. Her speaking parts are confidently delivered in a very dominant fashion. This is not by any means a well made movie but credit must be given to Hartsoe for finding & casting Lilith Stabs in it. Without her it is nothing. I believe this was her first venture into acting & I would say as compared to other movies I have seen her in it was her best performance.
Especially Glori-Anne & Lilith, cool dialogue and a very unique story idea that has not been done a million times like some low budget movies. Fun late night viewing with your friends on friday night with a beer in your hand! If you love Evrette Hartsoe's writing in Razor then you will love his lighter side in Vampire Call Girls.
- leslieculton
- Jan 31, 2000
- Permalink
This movie is -well- trash. But not like trash with cult potential like the movies of Ed Wood. It's not really a sex film, but not really a horror movie either: It's a soft-core skin flick with a vampire theme as a cover. Maybe it's because I'm European but I don't get overly aroused by stark naked women taking a shower or straddling a washing machine. (You can see this kind of stuff every night on TV here) The horror is not strong enough to catch my interest either; because of lack of a budget for special effects. But at least the director, who also stars in the lead role, has a sense of humor. If I took a bunch of friends from the Gothic scene and made a movie it would be much spicier than this, but I guess by American standards the movie went as far as it could without getting its maker into trouble. The women are quite nice too, even if they are a bit slutty.
I'm really not sure if I like this movie but that depends on one's expectations -and preferences- of course. If you like to see prolonged scenes in which amateurish female actors show their -uh- endowments while dancing around and light male bondage you will probably want to see this movie.
I'm really not sure if I like this movie but that depends on one's expectations -and preferences- of course. If you like to see prolonged scenes in which amateurish female actors show their -uh- endowments while dancing around and light male bondage you will probably want to see this movie.
- DarkObserver
- Jun 14, 2000
- Permalink
This low budget softcore trash has very little plot and nothign but big breasted girls showing off their left and right skills. The plot, if you call it that follows one man as he tells the story of how on a business trip he encounters vampire call girls that are out to make a meal out of him.
On a scale of 1 to 10 stars (10 Being Best)
I GIVE "VAMPIRE CALL GIRLS" -10 (- **********)
ON THE PLUS SIDE
GOOD LOOKING VAMPIRE
ON THE NEGATIVE SIDE
NO PLOT (90% Of the movie was the girls taking their clothes off)
BAD EFFECTS
BAD FILM AND SOUND (Like it was filmed with some guys cam corder)
On a scale of 1 to 10 stars (10 Being Best)
I GIVE "VAMPIRE CALL GIRLS" -10 (- **********)
ON THE PLUS SIDE
GOOD LOOKING VAMPIRE
ON THE NEGATIVE SIDE
NO PLOT (90% Of the movie was the girls taking their clothes off)
BAD EFFECTS
BAD FILM AND SOUND (Like it was filmed with some guys cam corder)
- lordzedd-1
- Mar 29, 2003
- Permalink
God! this film was sooo horrible but thank god for Lilith Stabs! She really brought the production to life with her evil vampy look. The rest of the movie, if you can call it that, was terrible soft-core porn. But it did have some dark content to it and the box cover art was fantastic. I think it was because of director Everette Hartsoe. He's also some kind of comic book creator, I think. Get this movie only if you're a fan of Lilith Stabs. I hope DEMONATRIX is much better.
Gothic? Bondage? Sexy vampires? If you don't like them, don't watch this movie. Aside from a good look at some of the ladies, there's nothing else.
A good but low-budget production does the best it can with its underdeveloped script. The vampires don't seem enough of a threat, and it's hard to understand how they stay in business this way.
I've heard they plan a sequel anyways.
A good but low-budget production does the best it can with its underdeveloped script. The vampires don't seem enough of a threat, and it's hard to understand how they stay in business this way.
I've heard they plan a sequel anyways.