55
Metascore
10 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 80Los Angeles TimesKevin ThomasLos Angeles TimesKevin ThomasTerrific entertainment, full of wit and energy, alternately hilarious and serious -- and very sexy.
- 75New York PostLou LumenickNew York PostLou LumenickLively, well-acted and directed with assurance.
- 70New Times (L.A.)David EhrensteinNew Times (L.A.)David EhrensteinFor those partial to sublimely happy endings there won't be a peep of complaint. Only us recalcitrant souls will be left wishing Punks had just a tad more spunk.
- 70The New York TimesDana StevensThe New York TimesDana StevensThe movie's warmth, and Mr. Gilliam's sober, likable performance sustain it through its ragged stretches and amateurish lapses.
- 70VarietyDennis HarveyVarietyDennis HarveySlick, ingratiating and high-spirited enough to win over gay men of all colors.
- 60Village VoiceMark HolcombVillage VoiceMark HolcombThanks to an uninhibited screenplay and the easy, unforced chemistry of its ensemble cast, Punks is mostly good, snappy fun.
- 50New York Daily NewsElizabeth WeitzmanNew York Daily NewsElizabeth WeitzmanAt its best when it embraces its true identity, as frivolous fun.
- 50L.A. WeeklyErnest HardyL.A. WeeklyErnest HardyFor a film purporting to tell it like it is for black gay men, race is the most poorly handled aspect in Punk's equation; it's almost as if it had no relevance. That might have flown if its most telling moment didn't suggest otherwise.
- 40Austin ChronicleMarrit IngmanAustin ChronicleMarrit IngmanNever mind the fact that romantic comedies about gay African-American and Latino men aren't exactly plentiful, let alone ones this good-natured.