Moonlight Whispers

Oh, I don't know. Even making allowances for differences across cultures and timeframes, it just seems to me that wherever a story of romance centers high school kids - crushes are one thing, romances are another - it immediately becomes less believable, and still less so the more that the characters are sexualized. The discussion of whether or not such stories are even appropriate is a matter for another day; the number of fellow students I ever knew in school who ever claimed to be more physical than "holding hands" or "kissing" was in the single digits, and most of them were definitely exaggerating. I'm not about to kink-shame Takuya or Satsuki provided everything is consensual, but 'Moonlight whispers' is asking a lot of us as viewers in trying to posit that these teenagers are so sexually inclined, let alone that they are aware of their own particular proclivities. Then there's the way that all this is presented, which in its own way raises questions about treatment of animals. Am I spending a lot of words questioning the behavior of fictional teenagers in a way that I wouldn't if these characters were adults? Yes. Yes I am.

And still, trying to set aside the fact that the movie is predicated on the behavior of these teen characters: beyond realism, there is the question of whether a narrative is written in a fashion that makes it convincing, and compelling. I think there are excellent ideas here, in the characterizations, in the dialogue, in the scene writing, and indeed in the plot at large. I'm not so sure that the specific form they are given by screenwriter Nishiyama Yoichi, or filmmaker Shiota Akihiko, holds any water. Or maybe the same subjective flaws can be traced to Kikuni Masahiko's manga; I don't know. I just know what somewhere between root conception, final formulation, and execution, the fundamental ideas on hand tend to go from "possibly interesting" to "um, what?" Only in sadly scattered bits and pieces does the picture hit on some little spark of brilliance, and I regret to inform that "sadly scattered bits and pieces" don't make for a satisfying viewing experience. Which then necessarily leads us back to observing that 'Moonlight whispers' is about high school students. There are fragments of lasting value here, but that's all.

Oh yes, the cast give admirable, expressive, committed performances. I can see why Tsugumi was lauded for her acting as Satsuki, for she shines more brightly than anything else in these one hundred minutes; Mizuhashi Kenji is swell, too. I appreciate the sparing touches of Honda Shinsuke's music as they lend flavor. Many shots are unexpectedly gorgeous, especially with various choices of lighting; director Shiota should be proud in that regard, and likewise cinematographer Komatsubara Shigeru. In fact, those operating behind the scenes, in general, turned in outstanding work. But that only gets us so far, doesn't it? The storytelling in the feature remains the problem; even as the whole slowly finds more of its legs (in the back end), the strength is highly variable. I can imagine an iteration of 'Moonlight whispers' that met its potential with all the same virtue of the best thoughts and contributions that went into it, yet as it exists this 1999 film isn't that. I suppose I'm glad for those who find this more rewarding than I do. I don't regret watching. I'm also unlikely to think on it ever again, and I'll never watch it again. C'est la vie. What's next?