The Lion in Winter
- TV Movie
- 2003
- 2h 47m
IMDb RATING
6.9/10
2.4K
YOUR RATING
King Henry II meets with Eleanor of Aquitaine at Christmastide 1183 to choose one of his sons as his successor.King Henry II meets with Eleanor of Aquitaine at Christmastide 1183 to choose one of his sons as his successor.King Henry II meets with Eleanor of Aquitaine at Christmastide 1183 to choose one of his sons as his successor.
- Won 1 Primetime Emmy
- 7 wins & 21 nominations total
Photos
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaPatrick Stewart previously played Henry's son, Richard the Lionheart, in Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993).
- GoofsEleanor refers to syphilis in one of her speeches, an impossibility in 1183 England. Syphilis was not named such until 1530 by Hieronymus Fracastorius. Regardless of whether Europe even had the disease prior to 1200, it could not have been known by that name to the Queen.
- Quotes
John: He has a knife, a knife!
Eleanor of Aquitaine: Of course he has a knife! I have a knife. We all have knives. It's 1183 and we're all barbarians!
- ConnectionsFeatured in The 56th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards (2004)
Featured review
I enjoyed this. Though not quite up to the standard of the original it was still much better than many films. The script is still fast and witty. The production quality is not so high, they obviously did not have the same kind of budget as last time which shows occasionally in the sound and music quality. But this does not spoil ones enjoyment.
Prince John was not acted as well as last time but Henry's mistress (can't remember her name) was much better. In the original I could not see why Henry would be so taken by her - this girl was much more fascinating. The scenes between Henry (Patrick) and her were convincing.
I thought Patrick Stewart and Glen Close hit sparks off one another.
I could believe in these two as ex-husband and wife.
The French King was very different from the Timothy Dalton version but good in his own way.
Worth seeing and interesting to compare it with the original.
Prince John was not acted as well as last time but Henry's mistress (can't remember her name) was much better. In the original I could not see why Henry would be so taken by her - this girl was much more fascinating. The scenes between Henry (Patrick) and her were convincing.
I thought Patrick Stewart and Glen Close hit sparks off one another.
I could believe in these two as ex-husband and wife.
The French King was very different from the Timothy Dalton version but good in his own way.
Worth seeing and interesting to compare it with the original.
- catherine_ell69
- Jan 6, 2004
- Permalink
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content