Dark World

OK, this movie has seen some bad reviews. Look past some of the acting, or lack thereof, and enjoy the twists and turns. It's a good story. Filmed well. I'd watch it again. Why? I like almost anything film noir from the '40's and '50's. I like gritty. I like characters that narrate and throw in some humor or twisted dialogue. This film may not be up to some classic noir but it does contain grit. I like Theresa Russell, the only actor I recognized in this work. The reviews are just opinion. Watch the flick, make up your own mind. I gave 4 stars because it will never be confused with a great film, but it's not a total loser, either.

The 4 lead actors are the reason I stuck around. These were hit commodities back in the 80's that just never really made it to their publicists promises. I'll watch Michael Pare and James Russo in practically anything. Theresa Russell and Steven Bauer are B-list that had a few starring moments back in the day, but yet - here they are. The rest of the cast just weren't in their caliber and could not hold the film. I did enjoy watching it, even though it was poorly written and the cinematography was non existent. Good way to waste some time while recovering from getting 3 teeth (1 was a wisdom tooth) pulled & on zone out meds. I dug the twist at the end. Again, poorly executed, but an interesting take on split personalities and tragedy. As I stated before, this could have been a decent film given better character depth and scene setups.

I love Michael Pare which is why I watched this. I was so happy to find it was a clever little movie with so many twists which i really enjoy. It is so hard now to find a movie where you are not bored after the first 5 minutes cuz you can guess what is coming next all the way to the end. Loved how the story went and wrapped itself up. I won't tell you the end but it is amazing! I love that someone has a made a movie which challenges me and surprises me at every turn. I think this filmnmaker should get a bigger budget and I would love to know what he (she?) will do with real money. But again maybe having less money is good since they've done a great job. Again don't miss Michael Pare in this gem. He is cool, handsome and yummy like always. When is Hollywood going to discover him all over again? His stardom is long overdue.

This film is absolute trash and proceeds to become even worse towards the, very protracted, end!

The plot is confused and laboured, the actors have a couldn't care less attitude (maybe they were paid in advance - bad move, or knew they weren't going to get paid), and the sets were featureless, boring and cheap.

I fell asleep twice and actually decided to not bother with the last 5 minutes as I assumed the actors would have fallen asleep themselves by then. More unrecoverable life time wasted!

If you must watch it, then take it to the bedroom and forget the sleeping pills for once. But maybe you'll need an antidepressant instead!

Sometimes it's good if celluloid degrades.

"Is that a gun in your hand or are you just glad to see me?" Seriously?! Dialogue like this makes any solid ground the actors might have to stand on disappear. Along with the poorly sewn together scenes this movie comes off as a run through rehearsal in need of a lot of work. Because we spend much of the time having the characters "tell" us or ask other characters what they are supposed to be doing, thinking and feeling the dialog isn't so much a chance for the actors to act as it is for them to "pretend" their characters. As Al Pacino once said 'don't lie to the camera it will always see it' and because the actors are never really allowed to act they end up having to fake what the dialog and the director can't seem to create - a plausible tale. This might have been a really good story but in the end this piece is a bit too "tacky" to "easy" for any of us to really enjoy. I give the acting two stars. Underneath the wreckage of what the director has done there could be a rather spooky and interesting piece of work. But not even the actors can make this film believable. FAIL.