Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

A for Andromeda

  • TV Movie
  • 2006
  • 1h 30m
IMDb RATING
5.2/10
779
YOUR RATING
A for Andromeda (2006)
DramaSci-FiThriller

In the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist d... Read allIn the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.In the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.

  • Director
    • John Strickland
  • Writers
    • John Elliot
    • Richard Fell
    • Fred Hoyle
  • Stars
    • Tom Hardy
    • Charlie Cox
    • Kelly Reilly
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.2/10
    779
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • John Strickland
    • Writers
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • Stars
      • Tom Hardy
      • Charlie Cox
      • Kelly Reilly
    • 16User reviews
    • 3Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos

    Top cast10

    Edit
    Tom Hardy
    Tom Hardy
    • John Fleming
    Charlie Cox
    Charlie Cox
    • Dennis Bridger
    Kelly Reilly
    Kelly Reilly
    • Christine Jones…
    Jane Asher
    Jane Asher
    • Professor Madeleine Dawnay
    David Haig
    David Haig
    • General Vandenberg
    Colin Stinton
    Colin Stinton
    • Kaufman
    Robert Gill
    • Scientist
    Thushani Weerasekera
    • Teacher
    Janet Spencer-Turner
    • Doctor
    David Maybrick
    David Maybrick
    • Orderly
    • Director
      • John Strickland
    • Writers
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews16

    5.2779
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    1paulj-murphy

    Absolutely awful pseudoscience and wretched acting

    Any schoolboy would be ashamed of the scientific mistakes in this. For example, the team send radio messages to Andromeda and get immediate replies! Andromeda is millions of light years away and so any radio signals would take millions of years to get there and back! Also, at one point in the story a technician saves a genome or record of the entire genetic code of a human being on a single floppy disk! Fred Hoyle would be rotating in his grave.

    The acting is equally bad. The two male leads are the "geekiest" type of anoraks one could possibly hope not to meet, and they are as wet as they come. Neither speak their lines clearly. And the Army General is about as nonmilitary as you could get...he looks like your average window cleaner.

    Please please please just go back to making them the way they originally did in the sixties, BBC...
    4stuart_poore

    An uninspired remake

    ** Contains minor spoiler**

    Despite being a remake of the 1960s BBC series, this comes across as an uninspired cross between Contact and Species. It is filmed using the typical cheap BBC Sci-Fi manner i.e. dull, grey, overcast and in a quarry. They spend the budget on the one "special effect", which is, of course, destroyed at the end. The story is unconvincing and the basic science is badly flawed (real time communication to Andromeda anyone?)

    It tries to pad out a thin story line with the addition of a few extraneous few subplots, namely a love triangle, some espionage and the oh so stereotypical "government subverting science for evil" thing. Even Jane Asher can't drag this up from being a long, slow, and predictable hour and a half.
    8chriscoates

    Flawed, but intelligent and enjoyable

    This is a fine example of British science-fiction. Necessarily wordy due to its low-budget, successful British SF has always had to rely on strong concepts, strong writing and carefully created atmosphere. In the same vain as Quatermass and Dr Who much of the action consists of people in a room talking about abstracts. Some will be bored to tears; but those with an imagination may find this story of predeterminism vs personal will and morality very engaging. If there's a flaw then it's that some of the, very real, science is over-simplified to an unbelievable degree. An audience is able to accept the idea of an alien transmission containing instructions on how to make a malevolent supercomputer. But the idea that these scientists are also experts in genetic engineering and quickly have all of the expertise and equipment necessary for their task stretches credibility too far. It's a shame because these problems could have been easily avoided with a little more creativity. At heart though this is a good, old-fashioned, morality play with some impressive performances and a rare intelligence.
    10a_ross84

    i enjoyed it

    unlike everyone else here, i enjoyed it thoroughly. granted, i am not old enough to remember the original, i believe this to be an advantage. i had nothing to compare it to. on its own it is an excellent piece of British SCI FI. i enjoyed it a lot i am going to find the original now and watch that. but i will not compare them. like Battlestar Gallactica. you cant really compare them, so why bother. i know it is a remake but it doesn't mean have to compare them does it. secondly who cares about some minor holes in the science of it. does it detract from the enjoyment of the show? there are so many shows that don't follow the science of today so why should this?

    all in all i really liked this. well done the BBC.
    7robertemerald

    Serviceable and intelligent first encounter movie

    A For Andromedia has a great story and good script, it is a work of intelligent science fiction. Science Fiction fans will have no problem getting through this work. The movie itself suffers for its low budget. The story needed to be projected forward in time. It's premise is on much safer ground in today's computing world than 2006, and would be even safer years from now. The movie needed a budget that reflected that. It comes across as a sort of play (or at least it did for me) which required my imagination and understanding to make it work. Face it, it's an intriguing idea for a movie. Working really hard are the cast, which is appreciated. One also has to appreciate the BBC, whom in this project, put their faith in cerebral sci fi. It certainly works, but could have had a better visual dimension, and if this story ever does, I'll certainly sign up for the reboot.

    More like this

    Deserter
    5.3
    Deserter
    Dot the I
    6.7
    Dot the I
    Meadowlands
    6.8
    Meadowlands
    Oliver Twist
    7.3
    Oliver Twist
    Colditz
    6.7
    Colditz
    Stuart: A Life Backwards
    7.6
    Stuart: A Life Backwards
    Star Trek: Nemesis
    6.4
    Star Trek: Nemesis
    The Take
    7.7
    The Take
    EMR
    5.3
    EMR
    The Inheritance
    5.3
    The Inheritance
    Capone
    4.7
    Capone
    Minotaur
    3.7
    Minotaur

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      The production was broadcast live to mirror A for Andromeda (1961). The same was true of The Quatermass Experiment (2005), which was a remake of The Quatermass Experiment (1953). Both A for Andromeda (1961) and The Quatermass Experiment (1953) are acclaimed BBC science fiction serials which are largely missing from the archives.
    • Connections
      Remake of A for Andromeda (1961)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 27, 2006 (United Kingdom)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Для Андромеды
    • Filming locations
      • Brecon Beacons, Powys, Wales, UK
    • Production company
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 30 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.33 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    A for Andromeda (2006)
    Top Gap
    By what name was A for Andromeda (2006) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.