5 reviews
When the main characters first meet, the viewer is subjected to some of the worst dialog and acting ever, and that includes the dialog and acting in porno movies. The acting improves later, but is still marginal at best.
The only appeal this movies has, in my opinion, is that people who enjoy seeing a women talking about brutalizing another will like it. Very little of anything is actually shown; it's only talked about. It might have made a better audio book, but even then, the section where the main characters first meet would have been almost unbearable.
The story, in the hands of another director, could have made a good thriller or exploitation movie. Unfortunately, this director failed to do more than make the viewer imagine the potential.
Jefferson
-Any fantasy is harmless; only reality hurts-
The only appeal this movies has, in my opinion, is that people who enjoy seeing a women talking about brutalizing another will like it. Very little of anything is actually shown; it's only talked about. It might have made a better audio book, but even then, the section where the main characters first meet would have been almost unbearable.
The story, in the hands of another director, could have made a good thriller or exploitation movie. Unfortunately, this director failed to do more than make the viewer imagine the potential.
Jefferson
-Any fantasy is harmless; only reality hurts-
- jeffersonjames1955
- Aug 20, 2006
- Permalink
Okay so I'm sitting here with a re-edited version of this movie on DVD entitled "Catherine's Pain." It should be, "Viewer's Pain." This is a movie entirely void of any enjoyment. If not for the nudity it would be a 45-second youtube video.
My copy is autographed by Bill Zebub himself, no less. If I trash the DVD and rip out the autographed box shell liner, the box will be the only thing valuable here.
The acting reminds me of grade-school plays where the children's' acting is stiff and yet in development, and the teacher is backstage, whispering lines to the children.
If you're planning to watch this for the nudity, there are two females, and between them there is one attractive face and one attractive body-- unfortunately not on the same body.
The plot-- plot?!?! There is no real plot. It's a sexploitation flick. Bill Zebub says that it's "experimental." Experiments are required by nature to state a goal. I'm not sure what the goal is here, if any-- self-indulgent ill-talented trash? There's some excuse for a vague message here about "what goes around comes around." Heck I just accomplished that by typing those words-- and far more successfully than Bill Zebub or the 'actresses.' There is absolutely no redeeming value in this re-edited, re-hashed movie or its variant evolutions. Nothing. Watching a blank DVD would be more fulfilling, honestly.
My copy is autographed by Bill Zebub himself, no less. If I trash the DVD and rip out the autographed box shell liner, the box will be the only thing valuable here.
The acting reminds me of grade-school plays where the children's' acting is stiff and yet in development, and the teacher is backstage, whispering lines to the children.
If you're planning to watch this for the nudity, there are two females, and between them there is one attractive face and one attractive body-- unfortunately not on the same body.
The plot-- plot?!?! There is no real plot. It's a sexploitation flick. Bill Zebub says that it's "experimental." Experiments are required by nature to state a goal. I'm not sure what the goal is here, if any-- self-indulgent ill-talented trash? There's some excuse for a vague message here about "what goes around comes around." Heck I just accomplished that by typing those words-- and far more successfully than Bill Zebub or the 'actresses.' There is absolutely no redeeming value in this re-edited, re-hashed movie or its variant evolutions. Nothing. Watching a blank DVD would be more fulfilling, honestly.
- capelladewdrop
- Mar 7, 2016
- Permalink
- Greatornot
- Mar 28, 2009
- Permalink