Rameses: Wrath of God or Man?

In the opening of the show there.is a conflict on the battle that Rameses covered up the battle as a win when in fact it was like a draw,and no Minton of the Exodus found anywhere,(according to the scriptures any mention of Moses was stricken from all writings and any mention of Moses was forbidden, so wouldn't it be reasonable to say Rameses covered up his son's death too. How was this not thought of or if so not mentioned? It's clear to me that these types of shows on the bible (sci, history, discover channel's so on) go way out their way to discredit the bible and it's contents. I don't believe the findings that this is even Rameses son, and the so call really re-constructed of his skull is ridiculous.

This documentary, complete with dramatic re-enactments, was strictly second rate. The musical score was annoying repetitive and the entire factual content could have been presented in less than a quarter of the time. Instead everything was asked repeatedly, the same two "experts" were introduced over and over again and very little real content was covered.

It had plenty of places for commercial breaks and before and after each one recaps were presented. Overall it made for a repetitive, uninsightful documentary that was almost painful to sit through the first time.

I'm an inveterate repeat watcher of documentaries but this one will not make it into my repertory.

Far better has been done before.