IMDb RATING
4.5/10
5.3K
YOUR RATING
Six strangers wake up trapped in an endless cornfield only to discover something mysterious is hunting them.Six strangers wake up trapped in an endless cornfield only to discover something mysterious is hunting them.Six strangers wake up trapped in an endless cornfield only to discover something mysterious is hunting them.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I don't understand the people who down vote new movies immediately.
I had a fun time and didn't make an instant connection to movies that I already love, such as "Cube".
This is worth watching, great acting and mystery. An hour in, I had assumptions, but didn't know exactly where it was going.
I've had more fun watching Escape the Field than big "blockbusters" recently. The only exception I can make, was watching Elvis (2022).
The only rotten tomatoes I see, are the early reviews! Too many people rate movies with ridiculously low scores. I'd probably rewatch this movie again. Here is my personal rating system for movies:
1-Won't watch again 2-Horrible, but I've seen worse 3-Didn't like it, may have something decent 4-Bad, but not terrible 5-Indifferent 6-Good, I might rewatch it 7-Solid, probably going to it watch again 8-I liked it, will watch again 9-Loved it, will recommend and watch again 10-Favorite of all time, will watch again and again and again and again and again.
I had a fun time and didn't make an instant connection to movies that I already love, such as "Cube".
This is worth watching, great acting and mystery. An hour in, I had assumptions, but didn't know exactly where it was going.
I've had more fun watching Escape the Field than big "blockbusters" recently. The only exception I can make, was watching Elvis (2022).
The only rotten tomatoes I see, are the early reviews! Too many people rate movies with ridiculously low scores. I'd probably rewatch this movie again. Here is my personal rating system for movies:
1-Won't watch again 2-Horrible, but I've seen worse 3-Didn't like it, may have something decent 4-Bad, but not terrible 5-Indifferent 6-Good, I might rewatch it 7-Solid, probably going to it watch again 8-I liked it, will watch again 9-Loved it, will recommend and watch again 10-Favorite of all time, will watch again and again and again and again and again.
I would probably give it more of a 5 to 6, but I rated higher to compensate for some of the terrible reviews. I actually found it interesting. It reminded me of a dangerous outdoor escape room. The main issue I have with it was the ending. They could have done so much more with it. If you do watch it, be aware that there is one of those hidden final scenes at the end after a few credits. I could tell by some of the reviews that not everyone stayed on and saw it.
I actually enjoyed this more than In The Tall Grass, which isn't saying much, but I had read the story that was based on and was disappointed in the film adaptation.
This was more interesting to me and just isn't as bad as a lot of these reviews claim it is, so I felt the need to give my two cents as a counterpoint to all the undeserved negativity. This is no masterpiece, but it kept me entertained and watching till the end.
This was more interesting to me and just isn't as bad as a lot of these reviews claim it is, so I felt the need to give my two cents as a counterpoint to all the undeserved negativity. This is no masterpiece, but it kept me entertained and watching till the end.
Ever seen the Canadian cult sci-fi thriller Cube?
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
Not as bloody as Saw. Not as clever as Cube. Not as inventive as Escape Room. Not a good film.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
Did you know
- TriviaActress Elena Juatco said this was one of the first productions to be able to get up and going after the pandemic hit because it was filmed outside and there were only six cast members.
- Crazy creditsThere is a mid-credits scene.
- How long is Escape the Field?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- El campo de la muerte
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $1,074,879
- Runtime
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content