14 reviews
This was similar to Parent Trap, set in Christmas time. The writing left a lot to be desired. The story line wasn't developed well and you never really felt connected to the main characters.
The split up of the couple was never explained until the end, so why would the audience want them to stay together? The addition of the "boss interested in the wife" was just plain hokey. It would have been more credible if she was interested in him and there was a conflict in deciding who she wanted to be with.
The scene where the little boy was lost was either completely edited to pieces or the worse writing of the entire show. The actions of the characters were totally unrealistic. The mom and daughter wouldn't have stood there holding onto each other - they would have been out there yelling and searching. And how did the dad know exactly where to find the boy - there should have been more dramatic search. From the camera view, they drove straight to the boy and found him - while mom and daughter were standing there crying. It looked like the boy was incapacitated due to a severely injured leg, yet dad picked him up, took him to the car, and set him down. No hospital? The log he lifted off the boy - not that big or heavy. The boy should have been able to roll it off.
The "almost reconciled" scene towards the end was poorly written. When they were discussing the faults of the relationship, there wasn't a discussion of regret and desire to fix - just "let's end it" on her part. The conversation didn't start out that way and there was no explanation for why it ended that way.
I can't blame the movie on poor acting because actors can only do so much with a bad script.
The split up of the couple was never explained until the end, so why would the audience want them to stay together? The addition of the "boss interested in the wife" was just plain hokey. It would have been more credible if she was interested in him and there was a conflict in deciding who she wanted to be with.
The scene where the little boy was lost was either completely edited to pieces or the worse writing of the entire show. The actions of the characters were totally unrealistic. The mom and daughter wouldn't have stood there holding onto each other - they would have been out there yelling and searching. And how did the dad know exactly where to find the boy - there should have been more dramatic search. From the camera view, they drove straight to the boy and found him - while mom and daughter were standing there crying. It looked like the boy was incapacitated due to a severely injured leg, yet dad picked him up, took him to the car, and set him down. No hospital? The log he lifted off the boy - not that big or heavy. The boy should have been able to roll it off.
The "almost reconciled" scene towards the end was poorly written. When they were discussing the faults of the relationship, there wasn't a discussion of regret and desire to fix - just "let's end it" on her part. The conversation didn't start out that way and there was no explanation for why it ended that way.
I can't blame the movie on poor acting because actors can only do so much with a bad script.
Needless to say that I had of course never heard about this 2007 movie titled "An Accidental Christmas" prior to sitting down to watch it, as part of a December marathon of sappy Christmas movies.
I've sat through a lot of sappy Christmas movies some years ago, so I am well aware of the standard formula that the movie's run by. I will say that "An Accidental Christmas" didn't exactly follow that particular blueprint, so writers Jeffrey Schenck and Mark Sanderson weren't exactly going by a formulaic model here. That being said, then I will say that I found the storyline in the movie to be boring and bland. It was a movie without any ups and down, as the narrative just droned on straight ahead at a monotonous pace. It was as if the writers were borrowing a bit generously from "The Parent Trap" movie.
The movie does have some familiar faces on the cast list, such as Cynthia Gibb, Jason Connery, Stuart Pankin and James Hong. I found the acting performances in the movie to be adequate.
I am surprised to see that it is Fred Olen Ray who directed this movie, especially taking into consideration his track record of dubious movies in the past.
There are far better, and far sappier, Christmas movies out there. And "An Accidental Christmas" just didn't really prove all that entertaining. If you enjoy sappy Christmas movies, then this movie really isn't worth the effort, given the fact that there are so many Christmas movies readily available.
My rating of "An Accidental Christmas" lands on a four out of ten stars.
I've sat through a lot of sappy Christmas movies some years ago, so I am well aware of the standard formula that the movie's run by. I will say that "An Accidental Christmas" didn't exactly follow that particular blueprint, so writers Jeffrey Schenck and Mark Sanderson weren't exactly going by a formulaic model here. That being said, then I will say that I found the storyline in the movie to be boring and bland. It was a movie without any ups and down, as the narrative just droned on straight ahead at a monotonous pace. It was as if the writers were borrowing a bit generously from "The Parent Trap" movie.
The movie does have some familiar faces on the cast list, such as Cynthia Gibb, Jason Connery, Stuart Pankin and James Hong. I found the acting performances in the movie to be adequate.
I am surprised to see that it is Fred Olen Ray who directed this movie, especially taking into consideration his track record of dubious movies in the past.
There are far better, and far sappier, Christmas movies out there. And "An Accidental Christmas" just didn't really prove all that entertaining. If you enjoy sappy Christmas movies, then this movie really isn't worth the effort, given the fact that there are so many Christmas movies readily available.
My rating of "An Accidental Christmas" lands on a four out of ten stars.
- paul_haakonsen
- Nov 30, 2024
- Permalink
OK, so it's not that great, but it's better than the one review in IDBM will have you think.Remember the child Lindsay Lohan playing twins trying to get their parents back together in The Parent Trap? Somewhat like that, but with Christmas put into the formula. Cynthia Gibb, who has a kind of Audrey Hepburn quality(big compliment!) is compelling as Vicky,a recent architect'apprentice, who wants more of an identity than just a wife and a mother,like Mrs Kramer in "Kramer vs Kramer". David Millbern as Jason Wright, the stunned husband who just doesn't get why his wife walked out on him, is endearingly nonplussed. And yes, he has a kinda high gaydar quotient,maybe because(if you take a look into his internet resume)he is an "activist" and Advocate contributor.
That said, I didn't find this ruined the film for me, it may have added another dimension.Jason may not be the stereotypical dominant macho type, but he can still be oppressive and insensitive to his wife and too embroiled in his job. Lots of husbands may have an "is he or isn't he"look and in real life they get the benefit of the doubt, why not here?And he IS likable and to me believable as the husband and father.
The children, hoping for a reconciliation, plot to force Vicky and Jason to spend a family Christmas together in their beach house in California.Myles,Vicky's hunky architect boss and old flame, (Jason Connery, Sean's son)is also spending his Christmas there,which provides some tension to the equation. Will Vicky give still-in-love Jason a second chance? Or will she defer to achieving her professional and newly found independence goals? Vicky doesn't seem to have gained enough footing in her new life to give it up so soon.Jason,on the other hand, may look like an easygoing guy and loving father,but husbands don't usually shed their old habits to give their ex-wives the necessary space to regain their identities.
It could go one way or the other,but although viewer sympathy is naturally with the father and children, in reality it's not an easy call. The way it is resolved in "Accidental Christmas"is not satisfyingly explained and it all seems too easy, a flaw in the script.The actors are not at fault, though. Millbern and Gibb are both good as the main characters,and Mr. Connery is just fine as Myles, we wish he had a larger role.James Hong, as the wise Chinese beach caretaker,who gives Vicky and Jason some sound advice, makes himself noted in a small character role.In the end the viewer feels like the film could have been more consequential in treating the wife's dilemma,so it feels like a missed opportunity. Still it is deserving and very watchable.
That said, I didn't find this ruined the film for me, it may have added another dimension.Jason may not be the stereotypical dominant macho type, but he can still be oppressive and insensitive to his wife and too embroiled in his job. Lots of husbands may have an "is he or isn't he"look and in real life they get the benefit of the doubt, why not here?And he IS likable and to me believable as the husband and father.
The children, hoping for a reconciliation, plot to force Vicky and Jason to spend a family Christmas together in their beach house in California.Myles,Vicky's hunky architect boss and old flame, (Jason Connery, Sean's son)is also spending his Christmas there,which provides some tension to the equation. Will Vicky give still-in-love Jason a second chance? Or will she defer to achieving her professional and newly found independence goals? Vicky doesn't seem to have gained enough footing in her new life to give it up so soon.Jason,on the other hand, may look like an easygoing guy and loving father,but husbands don't usually shed their old habits to give their ex-wives the necessary space to regain their identities.
It could go one way or the other,but although viewer sympathy is naturally with the father and children, in reality it's not an easy call. The way it is resolved in "Accidental Christmas"is not satisfyingly explained and it all seems too easy, a flaw in the script.The actors are not at fault, though. Millbern and Gibb are both good as the main characters,and Mr. Connery is just fine as Myles, we wish he had a larger role.James Hong, as the wise Chinese beach caretaker,who gives Vicky and Jason some sound advice, makes himself noted in a small character role.In the end the viewer feels like the film could have been more consequential in treating the wife's dilemma,so it feels like a missed opportunity. Still it is deserving and very watchable.
I looked forward to watching An Accidental Christmas because one of my favorite stars (Cynthia Gibb) was featured in it. (Funny that she's not even listed on the credits here?) ... Needless to say, it was Oh-So-Predictable from the very start. I went ahead and watched it anyway. I was neither engaged nor empathetic with any of the characters but something else kept gnawing at me which I couldn't pinpoint until 1/2 way through the movie. Millbern's tweezed eyebrows gave me the impression that he's gay. Perhaps he is or not, (it doesn't matter) - However, given the film's subject and his role as the husband, I couldn't get this perception out of my mind. Though his acting is 'ok', I felt the role was wrong for him. Scenes involving romantic interludes were not believable at all. This (tiny) observation bugged the heck out of me and kept me from enjoying the movie. Two Thumbs Down for miscasting and predictability.
- santa-rita
- Dec 25, 2007
- Permalink
Fifteen years of marriage is enough for attractive designer Cynthia Gibb and eyebrow-plucked attorney David Millbern (as Vicky and Jason Wright). The couple is headed for divorce. Their children, way too mature-looking Cassidy Freeman (as Melissa) and younger "Tiger" Austin Majors (as Will), do not approve of the separation. When informed of divided Christmas plans, the kids conspire to bring the parents together at their California beach house. Complicating matters are Ms. Gibb's blond boss Jason Connery (as Myles) and Mr. Millbern's blonde secretary Cassidy Freed (as Kristine). With assist from his family and regulars, director Fred Olen Ray rolls these off the production line. "An Accidental Christmas" might have benefited from some tweaking at the TV Movie factory, or not...
Best performance and scene is the guy sitting next to Gibb at karate practice.
*** An Accidental Christmas (9/9/07) Fred Olen Ray ~ Cynthia Gibb, David Millbern, Jason Connery, Austin Majors
Best performance and scene is the guy sitting next to Gibb at karate practice.
*** An Accidental Christmas (9/9/07) Fred Olen Ray ~ Cynthia Gibb, David Millbern, Jason Connery, Austin Majors
- wes-connors
- Dec 10, 2013
- Permalink
Just finished watching this Lifetime Movie again. (No, there was nothing else on TV!) Whoever did the casting for this TV movie must have been on a limited budget! The casting of Actor David Millbern as a 'straight' man/husband is far-fetched! His perfectly tweezed eyebrows were distracting, and it appeared he did not even attempt to "act" straight for the role. His mannerisms were more feminine than his wife's! I'm not a gay basher, far from it! I just don't know why he was chosen to play a straight role. Yes, a good actor can pull it off, but in this case it was a fail. (We're often "shocked" when an actor comes out -- that's because they are so good at acting and doing their job!) The kissing scene was so awkward; very much like seeing Jody Foster kissing Richard Gere ... just didn't work. Anyway if the story had been written better perhaps all of the 'fluff' would not have been so noticeable. The daughter, too, by the way, clearly must have been at least 20! She definitely did not pull off being a 14 year old! Too much makeup and cleavage for a 14 year old! But again, if the story would have been more interesting and better written, I may have never noticed all the things wrong with the characters! If you're looking for a nice Holiday movie to watch, or there's nothing else on TV, rent something or go to bed! Don't settle for something on TV as I just did.
I found this movie to be pretty inane. There are better Christmas shows to watch. I found it VERY distracting to see the men especially since it seemed they wore far too much make-up. It detracted from the plot as far as I am concerned. Very predictable and boring. I think there should have been better character development, more natural acting and stronger scenes. The acting seemed really forced. I was done watching after about the first half hour but stuck it out until the end. I also feel a lot of the plot line ended up being very stereotypical. At times the plot was lost in a lot of useless dialog that did not further the plot. There was no Christmas spirit, no sense of magic watching the show and nothing to catch one's attention. Shallow characterizations combined with the bad makeup and overacting was distracting.Even a made for TV movie usually delivers much more than this.I will not be watching it again.
- dorianne_swift
- Nov 25, 2011
- Permalink
This is seriously one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Yes, the sentiment is sweet and the actors are potentially good, but the writing was so awful that it was embarrassing and awkward just to watch. I feel that there are so many screenplays out there and ideas that could be turned into something great, but the fact that this one got picked up in this package is a sad testament to the state of TV-movies in general. It was not worth the money and time spent in developing and producing it. Would it really have been so difficult to amend the script? If they had taken a little more time to fix the plot and the script up a bit, then it could have been much much better. Actors, regardless of talent, can only do so much with a piece of writing. It's their script! It's what they go on. This movie did not serve the actors justice.
Also, the teenage daughter, if they were married for 15 years, that would mean she's 14 at the oldest -- WAY too much cleavage and make-up for some one that age. Too much cleavage in general.
Also, the teenage daughter, if they were married for 15 years, that would mean she's 14 at the oldest -- WAY too much cleavage and make-up for some one that age. Too much cleavage in general.
- aculberson1
- Dec 13, 2011
- Permalink
This film was a huge bore. It started off okay but it went south quickly. I love Cynthia Gibb. I have been a huge fan of hers since "Fame". This film however is not her friend. The lighting was harsh on her. She makes the most out of what is there but the child stars in this steel every scene away from their adult counterparts!
The script is a rip-off of "The Parent Trap" but it was written by people who don't know how to write and directed by someone who can't stage a scene!
Now this film is so bad that I had to sit through it to see how desperate the film makers were going to end it.
Trust me this film is bad but I highly recommend you buying it because it will put you to sleep faster then an episode of Arliss
The script is a rip-off of "The Parent Trap" but it was written by people who don't know how to write and directed by someone who can't stage a scene!
Now this film is so bad that I had to sit through it to see how desperate the film makers were going to end it.
Trust me this film is bad but I highly recommend you buying it because it will put you to sleep faster then an episode of Arliss
- Christmas-Reviewer
- Aug 6, 2016
- Permalink
The script-writers didn't break out of a slumber, let along a jog.
Workmanlike and entirely predictable (doormat wife rediscovers herself after two kids - the "daughter" looks old) and returns to her old job. Hubby can't accept this. The kids "engineer a "Parent Trap" style reunion with a Christmas booking at an old family favourite resort and...zzzzz.
We woke up as the titles rolled by. I looked at the original intended score for this and added one point.
Workmanlike and entirely predictable (doormat wife rediscovers herself after two kids - the "daughter" looks old) and returns to her old job. Hubby can't accept this. The kids "engineer a "Parent Trap" style reunion with a Christmas booking at an old family favourite resort and...zzzzz.
We woke up as the titles rolled by. I looked at the original intended score for this and added one point.
- hindsonevansmike
- Dec 21, 2018
- Permalink
Too many people are so unhappy of their lives and they have to criticize the other lives. This is just a movie, but, first, acting is really good, second, writing is more than acceptable, so in the end it's an enjoyable movie, but of course it's not if you have bitterness in your heart and you can't accept the little things that the life is offering you. Acceptation is the secret, enjoy everything you can, it doesn't matter whether or not it's great. An happy ending story is what I like, because at the end I feel light, I feel joy, I feel peace. I learned many things in my life, but only now I understood that the life is how you create it and even if it's a little bit late, I'm trying to fix what I broke with my arrogance, egoism, anger. I started enjoying little things and I don't have expectations. I'm not saying it always works , but it works much more times than before, so now I can appreciate a movie like this, I mean easy, simple, and in the end I have a big smile on my mouth and I can fly. I know that for many people, it looks stupid, but maybe a day they will understand.
- minunimion
- Sep 10, 2022
- Permalink
- cammietime
- Dec 9, 2021
- Permalink
Very very Obnoxious unlikable wife ( cynthia gibb)thinks she is finfing herself .Kids try to fix the marriage .who would want this woman,even the kids !
Corny ,silly and very not Christmas !!!
Beach is pretty
- maryann4510
- Nov 26, 2018
- Permalink
- novaatlassvg
- Nov 9, 2020
- Permalink