Brave Blue World is a documentary that paints an optimistic picture of how humanity is adopting new technologies and innovations to re-think how water is managed.Brave Blue World is a documentary that paints an optimistic picture of how humanity is adopting new technologies and innovations to re-think how water is managed.Brave Blue World is a documentary that paints an optimistic picture of how humanity is adopting new technologies and innovations to re-think how water is managed.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Featured reviews
Full of vaporware tech.
It was painful to watch.
So many contradictions between chapters.
The odd chapters was interesting just to see existing industrial complex but mostly awful.
And the narrative was just silly.
How is this 7+ stars.
This film tells us about inovative ways of conserving water, conjuring water where there is none and dealing with it once it becames waste.
I recently watched this documentary with my family and kids over the weekend. I was eager to see what Matt Damon had to say about water!! All of my family enjoyed the film and learned something new including my 8 and 9 year old kids who have just informed me they would like to work in water!
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
Bias, unsupported with facts, eco-fanatics opinions...and opposition opinions not permitted. The involvement of these high profile celebrities is suspect, too. They've invested in these schemes, so from a perspective, it's an infomercial for their personal wealth.
There's *an identical* "documentary", "A Thirsty World" (2012), that gives the same message. Here we are, eight years after that one, and not one prediction has come to fruition. Actually, some have proven to be the exact opposite of the doom and gloom forecast.
Some nice scenery, if you have a large screen, but otherwise, you can watch with no volume
There's *an identical* "documentary", "A Thirsty World" (2012), that gives the same message. Here we are, eight years after that one, and not one prediction has come to fruition. Actually, some have proven to be the exact opposite of the doom and gloom forecast.
Some nice scenery, if you have a large screen, but otherwise, you can watch with no volume
I am a chemist, engineer, and water resource scientist. While I'm always happy to see a documentary raise awareness of water availability/quality issues, this documentary has a number of issues of its own.
First of all, the so-called 'solutions' being offered by its sprawling list of do-gooder celebrities are not innovative, novel, or sustainable. They're well-proven technologies putting temporary band-aids on deep sociopolitical problems for the sake of making their celebrity sponsors feel good.
Second, the film has a number of corporate sponsors. As a result, it failed to touch on some very real issues with the way we currently treat water. For example, Reverse Osmosis is disgustingly inefficient. It wastes about half the water it treats. It also absolute munches through power, and the waste stream from RO is a concentrated pollutant being shot back into the environment. But Suez, one of the sponsors, is a major player in RO and membrane desalination. So that got glossed over.
Third, it perpetuates the myth of a straight-up bogus technology. Humidity-condensers are not viable products. They've been debunked over and over and over again. The thermodynamics of converting whatever small amount of moisture is in the air to drinking water are enormous. And other than that lone instance of local innovation, the rest of the documentary reeks of western-savior complex.
This documentary is mental candy. Replaces real nutrition, and is bad for your teeth (from all the clenching).
First of all, the so-called 'solutions' being offered by its sprawling list of do-gooder celebrities are not innovative, novel, or sustainable. They're well-proven technologies putting temporary band-aids on deep sociopolitical problems for the sake of making their celebrity sponsors feel good.
Second, the film has a number of corporate sponsors. As a result, it failed to touch on some very real issues with the way we currently treat water. For example, Reverse Osmosis is disgustingly inefficient. It wastes about half the water it treats. It also absolute munches through power, and the waste stream from RO is a concentrated pollutant being shot back into the environment. But Suez, one of the sponsors, is a major player in RO and membrane desalination. So that got glossed over.
Third, it perpetuates the myth of a straight-up bogus technology. Humidity-condensers are not viable products. They've been debunked over and over and over again. The thermodynamics of converting whatever small amount of moisture is in the air to drinking water are enormous. And other than that lone instance of local innovation, the rest of the documentary reeks of western-savior complex.
This documentary is mental candy. Replaces real nutrition, and is bad for your teeth (from all the clenching).
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Vidunderlige blå Verden
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $750,000 (estimated)
- Runtime50 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content