150 reviews
- LunarPoise
- Aug 17, 2010
- Permalink
- Chirpy_Chaffinch
- Oct 29, 2009
- Permalink
Andrea Arnold's "Fish Tank" was a big hit in Britain and at Cannes and now tries its hand at America, who will probably nickname it "White Precious." Anchored by a star-making performance from Kate Jarvis, Arnold's film is more grit and zero melodrama, a step-up from the weepy style of "Precious." Jarvis plays Mia, a teenager living in the ghetto where kids expect to follow in the option-less footsteps of their parents. Her little sister (Rebecca Griffiths) is already smoking and emulating skanks on MTV and mom (Kierston Wareing) is a drunk throwing parties with very sketchy friends. Mia has a dream of becoming a dancer and she finds encouragement from mom's new boyfriend, Connor (Michael Fassbender), a hunky security guard who seems like a nice guy but is, at times, "too friendly." It's familiar other-side-of-the tracks territory but it doesn't spend time wallowing in misfortune. Arnold's film is harsh, and with its use of language (the C and F words are used a lot), dead-end scenery, breathless sexual and violent encounters, and Jarvis' award-worthy portrayal, it's nothing short of compelling. It's a brave performance, a rough-fighter exterior masking youthful vulnerabilities. Fassbender also impresses as a charming/shady character that you're never quite sure has a sexual or fatherly preference toward Mia. It all comes down to a predictable yet scary ending where neglect turns dangerous.
Considering how much positive word of mouth it got, Fish Tank came and went pretty sharpish in most cinemas – even those in a larger city such as where I live. This was a shame as it meant I had to keep an eye out to eventually catch the film. Set on a council estate things are typically grim and within the first few minutes of the film we are treated to sudden violence and extreme language – all seemingly par for the course rather than being something special that we are witnessing. In this world lives Mia, a 15 year old who lives with a younger sister and a mother who appears to be not much older than her. She gets in fights and practises dancing by herself in an abandoned flat near her own. Her life appears to change for the better when her mother gets a new boyfriend who is friendly, good fun and is not put off by the sudden aggression that is the signature of life in the family home.
Writer/director Arnold quite impressed me with Wasp a few years ago and she stayed in my memory thanks partly to her shabby treatment at the Oscars (where, as the winner of her category, she had to receive the award in the aisle and do her speech from there – no stage for her), however Fish Tank she stays in my mind on the basis of her film-making ability. Fish Tank is not a perfect film but there is a lot to praise it for. Social-realism is nothing new but Arnold really hits the nail on the head from the start and delivers a simple slice of life that is played in the silences as much as it is in dialogue. There is a downside to this and it is one that most viewers will struggle to ignore – the running time. At two hours the film is just about 20 minutes or so longer than it can bear and, in all the silences, there are frequent areas that feel like dips.
This is a minor thing though because the silences depend on the quality of the direction and of the performances – both of which are excellent. Arnold's use of the camera is great – not only in terms of framing shots but also in terms of movement as this is not a static one shot type of film. The best example of what I mean can be seen in the scene where Mia shows off her dancing for Connor, the camera is close to convey the small room to the audience but it is also delivered with such tension that you can feel what is happening as much as dread it happening. Of course the performances are key in making this type of thing work and everyone is great. In particular Jarvis is brilliantly convincing – most people can do the accent and the swagger but she captures the heart of the character, letting the viewer see it even while keeping it below layer after layer of defence mechanism. She is by far the star of the film and she makes it look easy. Wareing, Fassbender and a few others are all good in support but it is always support.
The plot of the film is slight in a way but at the same time with the direction and the performances as good as they are there is always something going on and, as much as I would have liked it a little shorter, I would be at a loss to say what to cut out to make it that way. Fish Tank ends up as a very engaging and gritty drama thanks to Arnold's direction and Jarvis' very strong performance, it mostly avoids cliché and predictable plotting and the cold grey atmosphere of the whole film makes for a distinctive product. A great British film and very well worth seeing – how BAFTA managed to miss Arnold and Jarvis this year is a mystery to me.
Writer/director Arnold quite impressed me with Wasp a few years ago and she stayed in my memory thanks partly to her shabby treatment at the Oscars (where, as the winner of her category, she had to receive the award in the aisle and do her speech from there – no stage for her), however Fish Tank she stays in my mind on the basis of her film-making ability. Fish Tank is not a perfect film but there is a lot to praise it for. Social-realism is nothing new but Arnold really hits the nail on the head from the start and delivers a simple slice of life that is played in the silences as much as it is in dialogue. There is a downside to this and it is one that most viewers will struggle to ignore – the running time. At two hours the film is just about 20 minutes or so longer than it can bear and, in all the silences, there are frequent areas that feel like dips.
This is a minor thing though because the silences depend on the quality of the direction and of the performances – both of which are excellent. Arnold's use of the camera is great – not only in terms of framing shots but also in terms of movement as this is not a static one shot type of film. The best example of what I mean can be seen in the scene where Mia shows off her dancing for Connor, the camera is close to convey the small room to the audience but it is also delivered with such tension that you can feel what is happening as much as dread it happening. Of course the performances are key in making this type of thing work and everyone is great. In particular Jarvis is brilliantly convincing – most people can do the accent and the swagger but she captures the heart of the character, letting the viewer see it even while keeping it below layer after layer of defence mechanism. She is by far the star of the film and she makes it look easy. Wareing, Fassbender and a few others are all good in support but it is always support.
The plot of the film is slight in a way but at the same time with the direction and the performances as good as they are there is always something going on and, as much as I would have liked it a little shorter, I would be at a loss to say what to cut out to make it that way. Fish Tank ends up as a very engaging and gritty drama thanks to Arnold's direction and Jarvis' very strong performance, it mostly avoids cliché and predictable plotting and the cold grey atmosphere of the whole film makes for a distinctive product. A great British film and very well worth seeing – how BAFTA managed to miss Arnold and Jarvis this year is a mystery to me.
- bob the moo
- Feb 19, 2010
- Permalink
The best part of this film was the acting. The characters all felt quite genuine. It is a good portrayal of a troubled life and has emotional depth.
- briancham1994
- Jun 1, 2020
- Permalink
"All my films have started with an image," says director Andrea Arnold. "It's usually quite a strong image and it seems to come from nowhere. I don't understand the image at first or what it means, but I want to know more about it so I start exploring it, try and understand it and what it means. This is how I always start writing." What does the image of a fish tank conjure up for you? On the inside longing to look out, is fifteen-year-old Mia. Trapped in a housing estate. Trapped in a single parent family. Trapped by people around her she can't respect. Trapped in herself. For being fifteen. She has her own inner world, fighting to manifest itself . Fortified by cigarettes and alcohol she can kick in the door of the empty nearby flat. A bare floor. Her CD player. Practice her moves. A better dancer than those kids on the block she just nutted.
Mia is quite content to carve out her own double life, f*ck you very much! Never mind she gets caught and nearly comes to grief trying to steal a horse. And social workers don't scare her. But mom's new boyfriend – that could be a pain! A real spanner in the works. Especially when he's so annoyingly nice.
Under Andrea Arnold's hand, life on this inner city concrete backwater is suddenly very alive. Banalities become beautiful. Like sunlight through cracked glass. Vibrant, gritty and riveting, but in a way that entertains powerfully. As pulsating and funny as Trainspotting but without the yuck factor. Its momentum is overpowering. We never know what is going to come out of Mia's mouth or where events will lead. Each jaw-dropping new scene surprises yet seems the result of inexorable momentum. As if that wasn't enough, the story mercifully avoids kitchen-sink drama, excessive violence, drugs, getting pregnant, grand larceny, car crashes and all the other cliché-ridden devices to which cinema-goers are usually subjected. Tightly controlled, Fish Tank attacks with a potent and thought-provoking arsenal of story-telling.
Andrea Arnold proved she could do hard-hitting realism with her award-winning debut, Red Road. Here she excels her earlier efforts but still imbibes many of the verité approaches and senses of discipline that have filtered down from the Dogme and Advance Party movements. Her 'strong initial image,' or lack of subservience to more traditional methodology, maybe reminds of the devotion to experimental, avant-garde cinema taken by artists-turned-filmmakers such as Steve McQueen (Hunger) or theme-over-story technicians such as Duane Hopkins (Better Things). Michael Fassbender, who took reality to new heights as Bobby Sands in Hunger, here plays the mystifying and warmly charismatic Connor (Mum's boyfriend).
Arnold didn't allow actors to read the script beforehand. They were given their scenes only a few days before filming. For the part of Mia, she chooses a complete unknown with zero experience. Arnold spotted Katie Jarvis at a train station after drawing a blank with casting agencies. "She was on one platform arguing with her boyfriend on another platform, giving him grief." However the performance is achieved, Jarvis is electrifying. If Arnold wanted a 'real' person for the role, this seventeen-year-old takes over the screen with raw adolescent power. Says Arnold, "I wanted a girl who would not have to act, could just be herself." Fish Tank will lift you out of your seat and on an unstoppable flight, ricocheting against confines of circumstance and imploding a dysfunctional family with its head of hormonal steam. Laugh, cry, hold on tight. You will need to. I could almost taste the vodka, as Mia goes through her Mum's dressing table drawers, bottle in hand. I wish all British films were this good.
Mia is quite content to carve out her own double life, f*ck you very much! Never mind she gets caught and nearly comes to grief trying to steal a horse. And social workers don't scare her. But mom's new boyfriend – that could be a pain! A real spanner in the works. Especially when he's so annoyingly nice.
Under Andrea Arnold's hand, life on this inner city concrete backwater is suddenly very alive. Banalities become beautiful. Like sunlight through cracked glass. Vibrant, gritty and riveting, but in a way that entertains powerfully. As pulsating and funny as Trainspotting but without the yuck factor. Its momentum is overpowering. We never know what is going to come out of Mia's mouth or where events will lead. Each jaw-dropping new scene surprises yet seems the result of inexorable momentum. As if that wasn't enough, the story mercifully avoids kitchen-sink drama, excessive violence, drugs, getting pregnant, grand larceny, car crashes and all the other cliché-ridden devices to which cinema-goers are usually subjected. Tightly controlled, Fish Tank attacks with a potent and thought-provoking arsenal of story-telling.
Andrea Arnold proved she could do hard-hitting realism with her award-winning debut, Red Road. Here she excels her earlier efforts but still imbibes many of the verité approaches and senses of discipline that have filtered down from the Dogme and Advance Party movements. Her 'strong initial image,' or lack of subservience to more traditional methodology, maybe reminds of the devotion to experimental, avant-garde cinema taken by artists-turned-filmmakers such as Steve McQueen (Hunger) or theme-over-story technicians such as Duane Hopkins (Better Things). Michael Fassbender, who took reality to new heights as Bobby Sands in Hunger, here plays the mystifying and warmly charismatic Connor (Mum's boyfriend).
Arnold didn't allow actors to read the script beforehand. They were given their scenes only a few days before filming. For the part of Mia, she chooses a complete unknown with zero experience. Arnold spotted Katie Jarvis at a train station after drawing a blank with casting agencies. "She was on one platform arguing with her boyfriend on another platform, giving him grief." However the performance is achieved, Jarvis is electrifying. If Arnold wanted a 'real' person for the role, this seventeen-year-old takes over the screen with raw adolescent power. Says Arnold, "I wanted a girl who would not have to act, could just be herself." Fish Tank will lift you out of your seat and on an unstoppable flight, ricocheting against confines of circumstance and imploding a dysfunctional family with its head of hormonal steam. Laugh, cry, hold on tight. You will need to. I could almost taste the vodka, as Mia goes through her Mum's dressing table drawers, bottle in hand. I wish all British films were this good.
- Chris_Docker
- Jun 28, 2009
- Permalink
Fish Tank is a puzzle for me.
It's undoubtedly well made. The acting is truly excellent. It appears to be loaded with a lot of subtext and symbolism...it's not something that was knocked off in a hurry.
Yet for all the care and passion that undoubtedly went into its production, I just couldn't connect with it, which I found odd. Yes, I'm American but I always have found Mike Liegh's films to be very compelling, so I'll try to describe what I found it lacking by way of comparison.
Take Leigh's "Naked" and compare it to this film. Most of the characters in that film are extremely unlikable. It's by all accounts a brutal, grim, and depressing film (Fish Tank is probably the lighter of the two). Yet, I found the characters in "Naked" to be very compelling because I felt Leigh exposed them gradually. You couldn't predict their every move and motivation. I found almost all the characters in Fish Tank to be quite simplistic in comparison. Mia wants to be free. She wants to dance. She hates her home life. She's in love with her mom's boyfriend who has a VERY predictable secret that he's hiding.
And that's my real problem with this movie: the script. It follows a somewhat similar arc to Leigh's film even though the characters are nothing close to being similar. But Leigh's characters are compelling, and their journey is compelling. There is nothing in Fish Tank's story or characters that we haven't seen in similar coming-of-age movies many times before. If you take issue with this comparison, try Karen Moncrieff's "Blue Car" --- it's almost idenmtical to "Fish Tank" but the characters are a bit less black-and-white and off-putting, and that helps lift the story into places "Fish Tank" never gets near.
Without dimensional characters and a good story, the tawdry ugliness of this picture seems to exist for no other purpose than to shock, the way Larry Clark's "Kids" did when it was released. The scene of the 9 year old smoking a cig with her friend in front of the tube made me think of Clark's film and the bathtub/joint scene. But by now, these kind of "shocks" are a bit passé.
The off the wall reception this film has received is what stymies me. It almost appears as if Andrea Arnold was following a recipe for a "cutting-edge raw slice of life." It's well made yes, but it's none of the above.
It's undoubtedly well made. The acting is truly excellent. It appears to be loaded with a lot of subtext and symbolism...it's not something that was knocked off in a hurry.
Yet for all the care and passion that undoubtedly went into its production, I just couldn't connect with it, which I found odd. Yes, I'm American but I always have found Mike Liegh's films to be very compelling, so I'll try to describe what I found it lacking by way of comparison.
Take Leigh's "Naked" and compare it to this film. Most of the characters in that film are extremely unlikable. It's by all accounts a brutal, grim, and depressing film (Fish Tank is probably the lighter of the two). Yet, I found the characters in "Naked" to be very compelling because I felt Leigh exposed them gradually. You couldn't predict their every move and motivation. I found almost all the characters in Fish Tank to be quite simplistic in comparison. Mia wants to be free. She wants to dance. She hates her home life. She's in love with her mom's boyfriend who has a VERY predictable secret that he's hiding.
And that's my real problem with this movie: the script. It follows a somewhat similar arc to Leigh's film even though the characters are nothing close to being similar. But Leigh's characters are compelling, and their journey is compelling. There is nothing in Fish Tank's story or characters that we haven't seen in similar coming-of-age movies many times before. If you take issue with this comparison, try Karen Moncrieff's "Blue Car" --- it's almost idenmtical to "Fish Tank" but the characters are a bit less black-and-white and off-putting, and that helps lift the story into places "Fish Tank" never gets near.
Without dimensional characters and a good story, the tawdry ugliness of this picture seems to exist for no other purpose than to shock, the way Larry Clark's "Kids" did when it was released. The scene of the 9 year old smoking a cig with her friend in front of the tube made me think of Clark's film and the bathtub/joint scene. But by now, these kind of "shocks" are a bit passé.
The off the wall reception this film has received is what stymies me. It almost appears as if Andrea Arnold was following a recipe for a "cutting-edge raw slice of life." It's well made yes, but it's none of the above.
The poet Rumi said, "A rose's rarest essence lives in the thorn." The thorn is in full evidence in Andrea Arnold's compellingly honest second feature Fish Tank, the story of a fifteen year-old girl's struggle for self respect after having "grown up absurd" in the London projects. Fish Tank, a film that is overflowing with life, works on many levels – as a look into squalid economic and social conditions in small town Britain, as a warning to those who act impulsively and without self-control, and as a coming-of-age story that allows us to experience a genuine sense of character growth. Winner of the Jury Prize at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, the film features an astounding performance from first-time actress Katie Jarvis, a 17-year-old who was discovered by the director while having an argument with her boyfriend on an Essex train station platform.
Set in a bleak housing project in a working class London suburb, fifteen-year-old Mia is an angry, isolated but vulnerable teen who lives with her boozy mom (Koerston Wareing) and little sister Tyler (an adorable Rebecca Griffiths). Mia has no friends and is dogged by a mean-spirited mother who makes Mo'Nique in Precious look like Mother Teresa. Filled with barely controlled rage, Mia seems uncertain as to whether she is looking for a fight or for sex. She goes from head-butting a rival on the playground to struggling to free a half-starved horse tied up in a junkyard while cozying up to the horse's owner Billy (Harry Treadway), a gentle 19-year-old who seems genuinely interested.
Dreaming of becoming a dancer, Mia breaks into an abandoned apartment and practices her hip-hop dance routines alone to borrowed CDs of pop music including California Dreaming, the only time when she can feel good about herself. Mia's first taste of something resembling kindness happens when her mother brings home a sexy, shirtless Irish lover named Connor (Michael Fassbender) who works as a security guard Fassbender's performance oscillates between the charming and the shady and we do not know who is real and who is pretend and where it will lead. Mia has more than a passing interest in him, revealed by her deep glances and facial expressions.
When Connor lends Mia his camera to film her dancing in preparation for an audition, she uses it to spy on Connor and her mom making love. One of the loveliest scenes is when Connor carries a drunken Mia from the living room and puts her to bed, gently taking off her clothes while Mia, pretending to be asleep, sneaks an occasional peak and is obviously enjoying the moment. Although Connor's interest in Mia appears innocent, from the time Mia cuts her foot on a family fishing trip and Connor gives her a piggy back ride to the car, tension gradually builds until it explodes in a seduction that is not only inappropriate but has serious consequences.
Fish Tank is a strong and unpredictable film because Mia is a strong (though flawed) character who refuses to allow her miserable circumstances to control her life. Arnold uses the fierce slang of the streets, overt sexual encounters, and gritty hand-held camera-work to tell an authentic story of adolescence that in lesser hands might have recycled genre clichés, provided a falsely uplifting message, or offered a sentimentalized view of poverty. That the film opens the door long enough to provide a breath of fresh air once again tells us that life can be governed by what is possible rather than what is reasonable and Fish Tank, instead of becoming another sordid study of pathology, becomes an exhilarating dance of liberation.
Set in a bleak housing project in a working class London suburb, fifteen-year-old Mia is an angry, isolated but vulnerable teen who lives with her boozy mom (Koerston Wareing) and little sister Tyler (an adorable Rebecca Griffiths). Mia has no friends and is dogged by a mean-spirited mother who makes Mo'Nique in Precious look like Mother Teresa. Filled with barely controlled rage, Mia seems uncertain as to whether she is looking for a fight or for sex. She goes from head-butting a rival on the playground to struggling to free a half-starved horse tied up in a junkyard while cozying up to the horse's owner Billy (Harry Treadway), a gentle 19-year-old who seems genuinely interested.
Dreaming of becoming a dancer, Mia breaks into an abandoned apartment and practices her hip-hop dance routines alone to borrowed CDs of pop music including California Dreaming, the only time when she can feel good about herself. Mia's first taste of something resembling kindness happens when her mother brings home a sexy, shirtless Irish lover named Connor (Michael Fassbender) who works as a security guard Fassbender's performance oscillates between the charming and the shady and we do not know who is real and who is pretend and where it will lead. Mia has more than a passing interest in him, revealed by her deep glances and facial expressions.
When Connor lends Mia his camera to film her dancing in preparation for an audition, she uses it to spy on Connor and her mom making love. One of the loveliest scenes is when Connor carries a drunken Mia from the living room and puts her to bed, gently taking off her clothes while Mia, pretending to be asleep, sneaks an occasional peak and is obviously enjoying the moment. Although Connor's interest in Mia appears innocent, from the time Mia cuts her foot on a family fishing trip and Connor gives her a piggy back ride to the car, tension gradually builds until it explodes in a seduction that is not only inappropriate but has serious consequences.
Fish Tank is a strong and unpredictable film because Mia is a strong (though flawed) character who refuses to allow her miserable circumstances to control her life. Arnold uses the fierce slang of the streets, overt sexual encounters, and gritty hand-held camera-work to tell an authentic story of adolescence that in lesser hands might have recycled genre clichés, provided a falsely uplifting message, or offered a sentimentalized view of poverty. That the film opens the door long enough to provide a breath of fresh air once again tells us that life can be governed by what is possible rather than what is reasonable and Fish Tank, instead of becoming another sordid study of pathology, becomes an exhilarating dance of liberation.
- howard.schumann
- Mar 27, 2010
- Permalink
- rmax304823
- May 20, 2011
- Permalink
As an American who used to be a fan of British "kitchen sink" drama I can say this film not only eclipsed those films, it eclipsed that whole genre, which was about poverty-stricken males who vented their rage against whoever crossed their path, usually females. "Fish Tank" turns all that inside out. This is "grrrrrl" kitchen sink.
Katie Jarvis cannot get enough kudos for her performance as a teenager called Mia. She's angry at the world. She fits in nowhere. Her mother is an advanced-age party animal who resents Mia for reminding her she's a mom.
Mia's poor. In the U.S., she would live in the projects. Here, it's called council flats.
The plot is fairly simple ... at first. Mia falls in love with her mother's studly boyfriend. He knows she lusts after him. She knows ... The movie is not really about the outcome of these lustful/familial issues as it is about how Mia will overcome/survive them. The movie goes in unpredictable directions.
One wonderful observation about this film is the economy of scenes. Every scene counts. An American version would have included at least one music video. Here, no BS. Every scene counts.
And the movie is about survival. Kids can survive bad backgrounds. We root for Mia all the way to the end.
Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, say hi to Andrea Arnold.
Katie Jarvis cannot get enough kudos for her performance as a teenager called Mia. She's angry at the world. She fits in nowhere. Her mother is an advanced-age party animal who resents Mia for reminding her she's a mom.
Mia's poor. In the U.S., she would live in the projects. Here, it's called council flats.
The plot is fairly simple ... at first. Mia falls in love with her mother's studly boyfriend. He knows she lusts after him. She knows ... The movie is not really about the outcome of these lustful/familial issues as it is about how Mia will overcome/survive them. The movie goes in unpredictable directions.
One wonderful observation about this film is the economy of scenes. Every scene counts. An American version would have included at least one music video. Here, no BS. Every scene counts.
And the movie is about survival. Kids can survive bad backgrounds. We root for Mia all the way to the end.
Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, say hi to Andrea Arnold.
- dave-sturm
- Feb 4, 2010
- Permalink
This is a great film. It starts off a bit slow but I believe it serves a purpose. The filmmaker did a great job of portraying the characters in the film but exposing just enough to make the second half of the film come together in a way that helps you see the characters more deeply. Katie Jarvis did a wonderful job in painting a picture of an angry 15 year old 'Mia'. Why is she so angry? You can take a look at Kierston Wareing's character of 'Joanna', the terrible excuse for a mother that puts the needs of her children second to her own needs of looking for love and acceptance in whoever will give it to her. The mother finds this acceptance in Fassbender's character, 'Connor', who seems to be a great and unlikely catch for her. He seems to be a ray of light for the family but turns out to be just the opposite. My opinion is that the story is not about the damage the family experiences in the interaction with Connor but rather the reality that this is just one example of a series of bad decisions made by the mother that propels the children into a world of emotional pain and disappointment. It's also a picture of the cycle of dysfunction that is taking place in a family and the poor decisions that continue to keep that dysfunction in place. There is a glimmer of hope with Mia (her desire to help an old horse) but it is such a faint glimmer that it doesn't leave the viewer thinking that much will change with this family. There are some very hard hitting scenes in the movie that leave you on the edge of your seat saying, "I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS HAPPENING!" and there are some scenes that really make you feel sorry for the characters and you can really see some of them as victims, especially the children. Overall, great movie and I highly, highly recommend it.
Friendless and unloved Mia (Jarvis) dreams of becoming a dancer and when her mum's new boyfriend arrives on the scene, everything changes for the teenager.
Fish tank is an exceptional artistic creation, based on the purity of Andrea Arnold's script and appreciative direction whilst a debuting Katie Jarvis excels as the troubled isolated teenager, and what a feature this is.
British cinema is some of the most dramatic and flinching cinema in the world. From Trainspotting to This is England there are always issues of realism and points to convey and with this 2009 appraised release we see more hard drama.
The opening sequence follows Mia around the streets, slurring and shouting abuse at anyone in her radar and the coarse dialogue and minimal amount of sympathy is staggering. As if you had been slapped, this will instantly startle you into realizing the type of environment and lifestyle Mia is living in. The language will give Pulp Fiction a run for its money.
Added as an attempt to justify the rural scene of Britain, Arnold gets it spot on as everything flows with little adjustment required. Everything is as it should be because everything has been so carefully planned, in particular the character development which will have many shedding a tear or two.
Katie Jarvis' cold and unappreciative style is spot on for the protagonist and as the film goes through hard fights with families and spending time isolated in a deserted flat, we see the emotional desire of Mia. The ambition of becoming a dancer is exceptionally well produced, owing to the fact that the background is effectively established. The hard family life Mia is living inspires her to find a way out and her dancing is her motive to break free. This really does work up a treat with twists turns, ups and downs and a staggering climax that adds extra spice to the picture.
At only 15 the central character certainly has a controversial agenda set for her. From sleeping with random strangers to drinking anything dangerous, Mia seems unfazed. Seeing her younger sister drinking beer with her mother in the next room will have mouths dropping.
Thanks to this straight forward no messing attitude the plot can move forward and tell the audience of what real life entails and the cultural state we are living in at the moment.
Some British films go out of their way to preach, such as This is England and Brassed off and whilst that isn't a bad quality, the enriching style of this film makes it flow and add extra drama continuously.
The scene setting shots are exquisite, as if made from a Skins episode without the teen angst. The scene in the car is excellent and not to forget this film boasts an exceptional soundtrack that fits the mood as well as 2007's Hallam Foe.
Fish tank is an exceptional artistic creation, based on the purity of Andrea Arnold's script and appreciative direction whilst a debuting Katie Jarvis excels as the troubled isolated teenager, and what a feature this is.
British cinema is some of the most dramatic and flinching cinema in the world. From Trainspotting to This is England there are always issues of realism and points to convey and with this 2009 appraised release we see more hard drama.
The opening sequence follows Mia around the streets, slurring and shouting abuse at anyone in her radar and the coarse dialogue and minimal amount of sympathy is staggering. As if you had been slapped, this will instantly startle you into realizing the type of environment and lifestyle Mia is living in. The language will give Pulp Fiction a run for its money.
Added as an attempt to justify the rural scene of Britain, Arnold gets it spot on as everything flows with little adjustment required. Everything is as it should be because everything has been so carefully planned, in particular the character development which will have many shedding a tear or two.
Katie Jarvis' cold and unappreciative style is spot on for the protagonist and as the film goes through hard fights with families and spending time isolated in a deserted flat, we see the emotional desire of Mia. The ambition of becoming a dancer is exceptionally well produced, owing to the fact that the background is effectively established. The hard family life Mia is living inspires her to find a way out and her dancing is her motive to break free. This really does work up a treat with twists turns, ups and downs and a staggering climax that adds extra spice to the picture.
At only 15 the central character certainly has a controversial agenda set for her. From sleeping with random strangers to drinking anything dangerous, Mia seems unfazed. Seeing her younger sister drinking beer with her mother in the next room will have mouths dropping.
Thanks to this straight forward no messing attitude the plot can move forward and tell the audience of what real life entails and the cultural state we are living in at the moment.
Some British films go out of their way to preach, such as This is England and Brassed off and whilst that isn't a bad quality, the enriching style of this film makes it flow and add extra drama continuously.
The scene setting shots are exquisite, as if made from a Skins episode without the teen angst. The scene in the car is excellent and not to forget this film boasts an exceptional soundtrack that fits the mood as well as 2007's Hallam Foe.
- Stampsfightclub
- Sep 26, 2009
- Permalink
A simply awful and sad insight into the UK's lower economic lives. I say lives but really survival or existence.
Well filmed, directed and superbly acted by the young Katie Jarvis and able supported by Fassbender.
A very good if depressing movie.
"Say Hello to the world for me. "
Well filmed, directed and superbly acted by the young Katie Jarvis and able supported by Fassbender.
A very good if depressing movie.
"Say Hello to the world for me. "
- MadamWarden
- Mar 7, 2022
- Permalink
- Prismark10
- Nov 25, 2020
- Permalink
- down-emily
- Apr 27, 2011
- Permalink
- ken-roberts-1
- Jan 29, 2010
- Permalink
- kennyevans
- May 18, 2009
- Permalink
There is surely no argument about it now that Arnold is a very fine film director in the gritty contemporary drama genre. I'm less convinced about her writing and this film convinces me even more. She sets excellent scenes, creates interesting characters (even though we've seen them many times before), draws fantastic performances from a predominantly young cast, and creates realistic tension and drama, but in Fish Tank the resolution is weak and in the last act I thought the story got a bit lost as if she didn't know where to go with it or changed her mind several times in a bid to find originality. I'd be interested to learn how she wrote it whether that was always the ending from the first draft, or she tried to bolt on several versions before finally settling on the one we see in the film.
Make no mistake about it she is a special talent (a sort of ginger female Shane Meadows) and if she ever gets her hands on a brilliant story (written by herself or another) then they're will be no stopping her. I look forward to seeing her next film.
Make no mistake about it she is a special talent (a sort of ginger female Shane Meadows) and if she ever gets her hands on a brilliant story (written by herself or another) then they're will be no stopping her. I look forward to seeing her next film.
- colinmetcalfe
- May 9, 2010
- Permalink
"Fish Tank" is about a rebellious 15 year old girl, Mia, (portrayed by Katie Jarvis) whose life changes when her unsympathetic mother brings a new boyfriend, Connor, home (portrayed by Michael Fassbender) to their East London 'stroke' Essex council flat.
Now, whilst I do appreciate the film for what it stands for, I personally didn't enjoy watching "Fish Tank" purely because of the ways it made me feel uncomfortable and delved into a cross section of life I don't align with. That isn't to say, however, that what Andrea Arnold has directed and written is bad at all due to my own minor and fairly awkward opinion.
"Fish Tank" is a very good film, great to an extent, because of the way Andrea Arnold makes us interact with the characters and the content through the aesthetic style she has decided to go with.
This style is not static on a tripod. It's rough, brash, constantly moving and aiming to show the hectic, unbalanced life that Mia has. The camera itself is a grained image with no added transitions or special effects; it allows itself to be affected by the natural lighting and will easily move into a character's personal space; in other words, the camera is entirely hand-held and it is the audience's voyeuristic device.
The music as well is diegetic, whatever she or any other character hears, we hear and there aren't many moments when the music turns non- diegetic for the sake of the audience. There isn't any mood music or a definite soundtrack either, making the realism more uncomfortable for us.
The content is also brash and unstable due to the life Mia leads and her interaction with the world. She is an angry, opportunity-lacking and stubborn girl who feels like there is no way out of her current situation who spends her time hiding from the school authorities, drinking and teaching herself the only saving grace; dancing.
We are steadily pulled into her life and see just how her world works in contrast to ours, watching sections that we consider mundane or unimportant to the plot out of disinterest as we aren't used to that in film. We're used to quicker paced story lines and cinematography.
The plot is unpredictable and erratic; we never know exactly what is going to happen next which creates brilliant tension in certain sections. It also creates irony when you begin to consider just how much the film gets on with details rather than slowly sugar coating them so the audience can understand. It's all snappy in both writing and action yet still adheres to the classical three act structure.
Since Mia is our focus, the camera is almost entirely fixed on her and her point of view, we rarely see a character act any differently when she is not in the same area or have their development center stage much like we'd expect a film to include.
What "Fish Tank" does is subvert the stereotypical 'kitchen sink drama', an example of that would be BBC's "Eastenders", and takes away judgment. It provides the audience a literal example of 'don't judge a book by its cover', particularly when this film is entirely set in an area some of us know very little about due to news coverage and films re-stylising for the sake of entertainment purposes (such as Guy Ritchie's 1998 "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" or even Mike Hodge's 1971 "Get Carter" which both portray the working class but in different manners).
"Fish Tank" is completely authentic and realistic so whilst it's hard to believe such events can happen in a gritty, modern day film such as this, it is still a part of our world and so I admire Andrea Arnold's aim to stay faithful to the area she captured on film.
But as I said before, I felt very uncomfortable watching the film and how there wasn't exactly a moral. By this I mean that Arnold doesn't offer anything more than just an insight into Mia's world and leaves the film on a cliffhanger with every character's fate and doesn't explain anything further, despite our 2 hour time period spent observing Mia and almost being a part of her life. My only other negative feelings over "Fish Tank" are that I didn't understand it well enough to appreciate it entirely due to my own inadequacy as an independent film-goer, which is what Andrea Arnold clearly wants to knock down the barriers for, and it's not something I would re-watch for the sake of entertainment or education.
But overall, despite my own negative gripes, "Fish Tank" is honestly a good film and worth a watch for anybody interested in social classes, unconventional story lines and independent films in general. Love it or hate it, it's a great example as to how filmmakers are willing to go all the way for gritty, authentic and realistic stories in a modern day setting.
Now, whilst I do appreciate the film for what it stands for, I personally didn't enjoy watching "Fish Tank" purely because of the ways it made me feel uncomfortable and delved into a cross section of life I don't align with. That isn't to say, however, that what Andrea Arnold has directed and written is bad at all due to my own minor and fairly awkward opinion.
"Fish Tank" is a very good film, great to an extent, because of the way Andrea Arnold makes us interact with the characters and the content through the aesthetic style she has decided to go with.
This style is not static on a tripod. It's rough, brash, constantly moving and aiming to show the hectic, unbalanced life that Mia has. The camera itself is a grained image with no added transitions or special effects; it allows itself to be affected by the natural lighting and will easily move into a character's personal space; in other words, the camera is entirely hand-held and it is the audience's voyeuristic device.
The music as well is diegetic, whatever she or any other character hears, we hear and there aren't many moments when the music turns non- diegetic for the sake of the audience. There isn't any mood music or a definite soundtrack either, making the realism more uncomfortable for us.
The content is also brash and unstable due to the life Mia leads and her interaction with the world. She is an angry, opportunity-lacking and stubborn girl who feels like there is no way out of her current situation who spends her time hiding from the school authorities, drinking and teaching herself the only saving grace; dancing.
We are steadily pulled into her life and see just how her world works in contrast to ours, watching sections that we consider mundane or unimportant to the plot out of disinterest as we aren't used to that in film. We're used to quicker paced story lines and cinematography.
The plot is unpredictable and erratic; we never know exactly what is going to happen next which creates brilliant tension in certain sections. It also creates irony when you begin to consider just how much the film gets on with details rather than slowly sugar coating them so the audience can understand. It's all snappy in both writing and action yet still adheres to the classical three act structure.
Since Mia is our focus, the camera is almost entirely fixed on her and her point of view, we rarely see a character act any differently when she is not in the same area or have their development center stage much like we'd expect a film to include.
What "Fish Tank" does is subvert the stereotypical 'kitchen sink drama', an example of that would be BBC's "Eastenders", and takes away judgment. It provides the audience a literal example of 'don't judge a book by its cover', particularly when this film is entirely set in an area some of us know very little about due to news coverage and films re-stylising for the sake of entertainment purposes (such as Guy Ritchie's 1998 "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" or even Mike Hodge's 1971 "Get Carter" which both portray the working class but in different manners).
"Fish Tank" is completely authentic and realistic so whilst it's hard to believe such events can happen in a gritty, modern day film such as this, it is still a part of our world and so I admire Andrea Arnold's aim to stay faithful to the area she captured on film.
But as I said before, I felt very uncomfortable watching the film and how there wasn't exactly a moral. By this I mean that Arnold doesn't offer anything more than just an insight into Mia's world and leaves the film on a cliffhanger with every character's fate and doesn't explain anything further, despite our 2 hour time period spent observing Mia and almost being a part of her life. My only other negative feelings over "Fish Tank" are that I didn't understand it well enough to appreciate it entirely due to my own inadequacy as an independent film-goer, which is what Andrea Arnold clearly wants to knock down the barriers for, and it's not something I would re-watch for the sake of entertainment or education.
But overall, despite my own negative gripes, "Fish Tank" is honestly a good film and worth a watch for anybody interested in social classes, unconventional story lines and independent films in general. Love it or hate it, it's a great example as to how filmmakers are willing to go all the way for gritty, authentic and realistic stories in a modern day setting.
If you think England is only good for turning out glossy, romantic films adapted from their classic novels,guess again. England has long become a staple for some grim,gritty,edgy stories of the darker side of the human condition (with an emphasis on the working class---I guess they're channeling the Charles Dickens within them). Recent films such as 'Nil By Mouth',and 'Ratcatcher' have cemented this reputation. Now add Andrea Arnold's equally harrowing tale of existential despair, 'Fish Tank'. The story centers on Mia,a scrappy 15 year old girl,played with gusto by Kate Jarvis. Mia has an attitude problem,a short fuse,and has no problem solving adverse issues with her fists (evidant by an altercation in the film's opening with another girl,where Mia head butts her,giving the other girl a bloody nose),or her mouth (she has no problem cussing out anyone who crosses her path,including her Mother & little sister,who also boast of filthy mouths). Mia's big dream is to become a big time Hip Hop dancer & is always practicing her dance moves. Things take a turn for Mia's worse when her mom brings home a new boyfriend (Michael Fassbinder),who has less than wholesome designs for young Mia. Along the way,Mia attempts to make friends with an older boy who is in the process of restoring an automobile. As with other girl's her age,Mia experiments with the usual attractions:alcohol,drugs,sex,etc. All of this makes for a film that is not always easy to watch,but easy to admire for it's bravura. Andrea Arnold ('Red Road'and several made for British television projects)writes & directs this kitchen sink view of the British working class. Prepare yourself to get kicked in the stomach for 123 minutes. Not rated by the MPAA,this film contains pervasive strong language,an outburst of violence,flashes of nudity & sexual situation,including abhorrent adult behaviour involving a minor. Not for the little ones.
- druid333-2
- Mar 12, 2010
- Permalink
The movie follows an every-day activity of a no manner, bad-temper 15- year old girl who grows up in a terrible neighborhood with a bad and insensitive mother. Her miserable life is stirred when she meets her alcoholic mother's new good-looking boyfriend. The sexual tension is immense and it feels real. I praise the movie for its realistic plot; it's totally could be something happening right now somewhere. I also love the good acting. However, because the movie tries hard to replicate the life and relationship in a realistic way, it comes off drag on, boring, bleak, depressing, and it provides no value from an entertaining viewpoint. The movie ends leaving me shallow like an empty fish tank.
But thanks to this movie, I found Bobby Womack's version of California Dreaming. Love this rendition.
But thanks to this movie, I found Bobby Womack's version of California Dreaming. Love this rendition.
- nokturnal-rapport
- May 28, 2012
- Permalink
- cshiira-681-591495
- May 5, 2010
- Permalink