13 reviews
Nice harlequin vibes for a night on the couch but could not look past her foundation that was only on her face and not on her neck.
Anyway, if you like to know the plot after 5 minutes of watching (which is very nice at times) this is the movie for you!
Anyway, if you like to know the plot after 5 minutes of watching (which is very nice at times) this is the movie for you!
- caroline-willemsen
- Jun 13, 2021
- Permalink
It was a very formulaic film, city girl reconnecting with roots blah blah blah, put her in cute country clothes which never get mucky (dirty for non northern English people). The lead actress seems sweet and extremely pretty but lacked acting ability or emotions, whether that was because her character was two dimensional or on the actor's part, I don't know. The supporting actress is a much better lead and actress when I have seen her previously, so would have made a better lead. None of the males shined but possibly also due to a dire script.
The grapes with synthetic leaves, daffodils in harvest time and very red, waxed apples, just fallen from the tree were, as usual, very silly.
The positives were a beautiful setting, lots of sunshine to enjoy on a dull winter's day and an inoffensive way of relaxing.
The grapes with synthetic leaves, daffodils in harvest time and very red, waxed apples, just fallen from the tree were, as usual, very silly.
The positives were a beautiful setting, lots of sunshine to enjoy on a dull winter's day and an inoffensive way of relaxing.
The plot was not original. The main character lived on this farm, but was clueless as to what went on. She was so overly dramatic that it was sooooo annoying. Her acting was so over dramatic. It was kind of irritating to listen to her. Then there was no chemistry between her and the male lead. But then he's not a real man anyway, which might explain it. The little girl was awesome. She was the best actress of them all.
The only way this movie got five stars is for being family friendly, not that the stars are.
It's possible it was the writing that was terrible. But the actors/actresses didn't help.
The only way this movie got five stars is for being family friendly, not that the stars are.
It's possible it was the writing that was terrible. But the actors/actresses didn't help.
A man farmer, who is uncle to Curly Sue, falls in love with a robot on an adjacent grape farm. The acting is pretty bad. Main characters are as stiff and interesting as a cardboard box.
- junktoddsteiger
- Jun 24, 2022
- Permalink
6.5 stars.
Just barely rounds up to a 7. It's somewhat difficult to manage placing this story in the realm of possible for several reasons. The main actor is not straight, so envisioning him as it is already difficult. But that's the reality of Hollywood, once an actor comes out, there's no stuffing themselves back in. Sure, we could say it's no different than trying to believe a straight portraying a non character. So be it. It's all about getting into the romance and enjoying the experience of attraction between two leads, knowing that one of them isn't capable of being that for the other. Ok, like I said, so be it.
Now let's talk about the movie. This story is presented to us in slow motion. I am not kidding. The tempo of conversation is literally turned down to 65%. Every sentence is deliberate, so the 90 minutes of run time is telling a 60 minute story. The story itself is not original in any way. In fact, this is about as unoriginal and monotonous as they come. So what was good about it? It's very relaxing and ASMR-like. This is a good film to unwind and end your hectic day with. Just too slow moving for any entertainment, but it has value in other respects.
Just barely rounds up to a 7. It's somewhat difficult to manage placing this story in the realm of possible for several reasons. The main actor is not straight, so envisioning him as it is already difficult. But that's the reality of Hollywood, once an actor comes out, there's no stuffing themselves back in. Sure, we could say it's no different than trying to believe a straight portraying a non character. So be it. It's all about getting into the romance and enjoying the experience of attraction between two leads, knowing that one of them isn't capable of being that for the other. Ok, like I said, so be it.
Now let's talk about the movie. This story is presented to us in slow motion. I am not kidding. The tempo of conversation is literally turned down to 65%. Every sentence is deliberate, so the 90 minutes of run time is telling a 60 minute story. The story itself is not original in any way. In fact, this is about as unoriginal and monotonous as they come. So what was good about it? It's very relaxing and ASMR-like. This is a good film to unwind and end your hectic day with. Just too slow moving for any entertainment, but it has value in other respects.
Another tale of city girl coming back to her country town and falling for local farmer boy. Nothing original, nothing offensive, nothing relevant.
FILMING: Some views of the countryside are pleasant and inviting, probably the better part of the entire content.
SCRIPT: rather generic and bland, with little or no drama.
CHARACTERS: Cute the little girl, the others have no depth, little vitality, and no endearing qualities.
ACTING: subpar across the field. Jonathan Bennett appears ill-cast in the role of what should have been a rugged countryman. He seems uneasy and comes out unconvincing. Definitely far from his best. Alix Angelis is pretty, but her acting is wooden, almost stereotyped. Half of the time, she is seen on close-ups with goo-goo eyes and a faintly lost expression that, I suppose, was intended to show how smitten she is from the first moment on.
DIRECTING: Probably the cause of all above detracting elements. It must be, as I have seen the same actors do better in other production.
Overall, a production that lives no marks, rather insipid and forgettable.
FILMING: Some views of the countryside are pleasant and inviting, probably the better part of the entire content.
SCRIPT: rather generic and bland, with little or no drama.
CHARACTERS: Cute the little girl, the others have no depth, little vitality, and no endearing qualities.
ACTING: subpar across the field. Jonathan Bennett appears ill-cast in the role of what should have been a rugged countryman. He seems uneasy and comes out unconvincing. Definitely far from his best. Alix Angelis is pretty, but her acting is wooden, almost stereotyped. Half of the time, she is seen on close-ups with goo-goo eyes and a faintly lost expression that, I suppose, was intended to show how smitten she is from the first moment on.
DIRECTING: Probably the cause of all above detracting elements. It must be, as I have seen the same actors do better in other production.
Overall, a production that lives no marks, rather insipid and forgettable.
There are just too many things that don't make sense. To be fair, I was multi-tasking while watching, so I could have missed some things.
1. The dad goes on vacation during harvest time and makes no arrangements to pick the crops. All the neighbors have to come in and save the day.
2. The dad asks her to go review the sale papers, however, when he comes back, she is still in charge - and making all the decisions.
3. She grew up on a farm and doesn't even know the basic lingo or anything about farming what so ever. So the neighbors always came around to help, but apparently, they didn't make their able bodied kid help. And they must not have every spoke about their livelihood in front of said kid.
4. The main character said she left shortly after her mom died, so she never learned anything about the farm. She also said she left when she was about Mabel's age (12). Again - she should have known the basics of farming and where did she go and who did she live with? Her dad stayed on the farm.
5. Do you really need to do a fashion show when buying clothes to pick crops?
6. She had on as much make-up as a clown right after getting out of the shower.
It's all in the details!
1. The dad goes on vacation during harvest time and makes no arrangements to pick the crops. All the neighbors have to come in and save the day.
2. The dad asks her to go review the sale papers, however, when he comes back, she is still in charge - and making all the decisions.
3. She grew up on a farm and doesn't even know the basic lingo or anything about farming what so ever. So the neighbors always came around to help, but apparently, they didn't make their able bodied kid help. And they must not have every spoke about their livelihood in front of said kid.
4. The main character said she left shortly after her mom died, so she never learned anything about the farm. She also said she left when she was about Mabel's age (12). Again - she should have known the basics of farming and where did she go and who did she live with? Her dad stayed on the farm.
5. Do you really need to do a fashion show when buying clothes to pick crops?
6. She had on as much make-up as a clown right after getting out of the shower.
It's all in the details!
I chose to watch this movie because I have seen Jonathan Bennett in other movies. This was not one of his best. I was very surprised to see that it was a recent production - 2021. I was sure is was one of his earlier movies.
Acting by all the actors was second rate in my opinion and I am usually pretty forgiving. The niece was the exception, as I generally think children add something to movies.
The positive about the movie was that it was a clean wholesome family show. I am okay with predictable "Hallmark-type" movies but the acting was poor. There was no chemistry between the actors. Overall it was disappointing.
Acting by all the actors was second rate in my opinion and I am usually pretty forgiving. The niece was the exception, as I generally think children add something to movies.
The positive about the movie was that it was a clean wholesome family show. I am okay with predictable "Hallmark-type" movies but the acting was poor. There was no chemistry between the actors. Overall it was disappointing.
- winnereitherway-07508
- Sep 2, 2022
- Permalink
The main character says how relaxed she feels at the farm, and the movie really captures this throughout. The plot is nothing new, and I don't entirely like the way the 12 year old kid is treated, but this presentation brings a peace not often found in the now huge feel-good film library. I'm at a massive crossroads in life too, and watching this helps me remember I'm not the only one in that situation and to stay calm! I usually try to watch flicks in season, but this harvest theme has spurred me on through the winter - better days ahead etc. With three generations of characters, there is something for all ages / different stages in life, which always makes shows more rewatchable.
- SunnyDaise
- Jan 3, 2023
- Permalink
- dbalm-51496
- Feb 9, 2024
- Permalink
- keliamparan-24184
- Jun 5, 2024
- Permalink
The other reviewers are pretty much echoing my sentiments about this film. The lead actress is just awful, although it's hard to make to like a character who is so dumb about harvesting grapes that she Googles "graping" to find out what to do. Jonathan Bennett, who was the main reason for watching, doesn't seem to be working all that hard. And the plot holes are ridiculous. The dad doesn't have farmhands he hires on a regular basis to harvest the grapes? Who puts a hotel in the middle of a vineyard? The acting, save for the niece, is BAD. I know films like these aren't supposed to be great cinema, but that's not an excuse to have a lame story, weak actors and terrible pacing.
- bellsauf-57493
- Oct 22, 2023
- Permalink