Facing an existential threat that could bring down the Crime Lab, a brilliant team of forensic investigators must welcome back old friends and deploy new techniques to preserve and serve jus... Read allFacing an existential threat that could bring down the Crime Lab, a brilliant team of forensic investigators must welcome back old friends and deploy new techniques to preserve and serve justice in Sin City (aka Las Vegas, Nevada).Facing an existential threat that could bring down the Crime Lab, a brilliant team of forensic investigators must welcome back old friends and deploy new techniques to preserve and serve justice in Sin City (aka Las Vegas, Nevada).
- Awards
- 2 wins total
Browse episodes
7.410.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Salvageable, but Mandeep Dhillon needs to go
The cast seems like they can be salvaged and could start gelling, but Dhillon sticks out like a sore thumb. I liked her in After Life, but she's just awful here. She needs to be sent off.
Rewatched original.
Have watched 1st 6 episodes with high anticipation not having watched the original for quite a few years.
1st thoughts.... what is missing with this show? Characters don't feel right, script and dialogue don't feel right. Even returning Grissom and Sara seem off.
So I went back and started rewatching the original show. Oh, the original is so much better and for a show 21 years old it is so good and holds up so well.
Acting, script, filming style is just all so much better than new show.
Even though I was never fond of all the characters except for Grissom and Willows (Nick, Sara and Warrick never truly engaged me - especially Warrick and Sara) the dynamics all work brilliantly.
So getting back to new version, Grissom seems a parody of the old Grissom (and I am truly a fan of Peterson). The others just don't have the same chemistry with their interactions.
Verdict: maybe it will grow on me but I'm having much more enjoyment rewatching 1st 12 episodes of Season One.
1st thoughts.... what is missing with this show? Characters don't feel right, script and dialogue don't feel right. Even returning Grissom and Sara seem off.
So I went back and started rewatching the original show. Oh, the original is so much better and for a show 21 years old it is so good and holds up so well.
Acting, script, filming style is just all so much better than new show.
Even though I was never fond of all the characters except for Grissom and Willows (Nick, Sara and Warrick never truly engaged me - especially Warrick and Sara) the dynamics all work brilliantly.
So getting back to new version, Grissom seems a parody of the old Grissom (and I am truly a fan of Peterson). The others just don't have the same chemistry with their interactions.
Verdict: maybe it will grow on me but I'm having much more enjoyment rewatching 1st 12 episodes of Season One.
Don't reboot classics
As a huge fan of all the CSI franchises (even Cyber) I was looking forward to this. I binged the first series and had high hopes with the return of a few familiar faces but something just didn't seem quite right. The camaraderie was missing between the characters, they just didn't gel and it seemed like they were literally just reading lines. No fluidity, it was obvious they were all strangers, yet in the original series you genuinely believed they were colleagues and friends at the same time. I've just started the 2nd series and it hasn't got any better. I am British and have lived and worked all over the UK yet Mandeep Dhillon's accent is overbearing and annoying to the point it's making me want to switch off. It seems forced. I doubt very much I will finish this series.
Wooden actress
Mandeep has about 5 expressions but without emotion. Her lackluster walking thru the lines detracts from a diverse and otherwise interesting group of cast members. Also, the actress heading CSI is rather lacking in the intensity that role requires! The show needs a dynamic leader with dimension. If you could replace those two with seasoned character actors/actresses it would improve the show overall. The previous leaders possessed layers, history, paradoxes and edginess that kept me returning to find out more, so far I can't get invested with these boring characters. This WAS such a well played series until they got into long drawn out storylines that eventually I just wanted it over with. Please don't fall into that trap again.
Ok in parts
The major problem with this is that the actress they have chosen to play the lead is just a lead actress. She was ok in castle when she played a supporting actress but just isn't up to carry a show like CSI. Needs to be recast.
Did you know
- TriviaMatt Lauria, who plays Josh Folsom, is not a newcomer to the CSI franchise. He played Agent Matthew Pratt in Zippered (2011), Ms. Willows Regrets (2012) and Willows in the Wind (2012).
- GoofsThe writers admitted to taking some creative liberties to make the show more engaging: - In reality, CSIs don't investigate crimes or conduct interviews-they simply collect and analyze evidence. - They do so while wearing booties and "bunny suits" (a full white body covering, including a hood) to prevent cross-contamination. - The writers also cut out much of the waiting time for results and bent the science to keep the pace exciting. As a result, the CSIs often receive evidence results that would be impossible in real life. This has contributed to the so-called "CSI Effect," where juries come to expect a mountain of forensic evidence in every criminal case.
- ConnectionsFollows CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (2000)
- How many seasons does CSI: Vegas have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






