User reviews

Initially I was put off by Tár-it's cryptic, drab, and sluggish. Until I realized what the filmmakers were actually accomplishing. No spoilers in this review, but to enjoy the film you have to know certain things:

1. Yes, Cate Blanchett is fantastic and rightfully deserves the accolades.

2. The film is the slowest of slow burns.

3. The film does not hold your hand.

4. The film's narrative cuts out key elements of scenes that other filmmakers would have highlighted. This was the sticking point for me-it didn't dawn on me until halfway through the film what was happening. If you know this going in, I believe you'll have a better experience with the film. The film purposefully *doesn't* show you the "important" elements of scenes or relationships between characters. You have to figure that out yourself, just like putting together the puzzle of who Lydia Tár actually is. Here's a quick non-related example:

Bill stared at the smoke in the frying pan.

Bill rubbed his nose five times and took a call from Ernest while sipping coffee at Station 271.

If those two sentences above were in a book, it would be leaving out major plot points that other authors would have filled in. First, there was a fire in Bill's kitchen. He called the fire department. He had to evacuate, so the fire may have been bad. And who is Ernest, if we have not been introduced to that character before? Why is bill rubbing his nose so much? Is it a tick or OCD or nervous habit?

That's what Tár is like. It presents to you all the items "between the lines" and lets you solve for X for yourself. Once I understood that that was the dominant cinematic approach in this film, it became immensely more enjoyable...and challenging. Very much worth your time if you put in the effort.

It is not surprising that this film is tanking at the box office since it is much too long and slow paced for the average movie goer's attention span. Indeed parts of it, like the agonizingly protracted opening scene where a New Yorker magazine music critic interviews the title character about her classical music esthetics, seem designed by writer/director Tod Field as a boredom experiment wherein if you can survive it without running and screaming into the night out of sheer and utter ennui then you are worthy to see the rest of his "masterpiece".

Thing is, though, that a lot of this film does approach, if not encroach upon, masterpiece territory. Certain scenes, like Lydia Tar's bleak Staten Island homecoming where she summons the spirit of her mentor Leonard Bernstein in an effort to recapture the humanistic values she has lost, are genuinely heartbreaking. And the sequences that deal with Lydia's manipulation of her acolytes are difficult to watch as we see how artistic power feels even more corruptible, somehow, than the political kind, perhaps because it is a profanation of a purer space.

And I think we can all agree that Cate Blanchett is one helluva fine actor! As are Nina Hoss, Noemie Merlant and Sophie Kauer who play various of her entourage/victims.

Bottom line: For all its faults I have a sneaking suspicion that in twenty years they'll be watching this and not "The Fabelmans". Give it a B plus.

Everybody writing about this mock biopic focuses on Cate Blanchett's knock-it-out-of-the-park performance, but when compared to Field's "Little Children" (2006), "Tár" lacks the storytelling and editing skills which make the earlier film a masterpiece of human relations, whereas the latter is an interesting character study that somehow collapses under its own weight.

There's a strong establishing scene showing Tár demolishing an aspiring musician's conceited views on Bach, yet one has to wait for a long time for a follow-up showing the main character's boundary issues. The central topic emerges rather quickly (abuse of power), but there are diversions which support character development, yet drag on the narrative, which is probably why many reviews here find the film frustrating.

Being an ex-Berliner, I like the fact that the city is being used as a real location as opposed to the usual tourist / Cold War hot spots, and the Philharmonics rehearsal scenes are very well done, but they don't really push the story forward and could have easily been wound down a bit.

Nina Hoss as Tár's partner is a brilliant counterpoint, because she keeps a good deal of her thoughts to herself until she doesn't, so more focus on their relationship would have helped the story. Hoss would deserve a supporting actress Academy Award nod if only she had more screen time.

The initial scene of conflict eventually loops back into focus, and Field could have used this to explore societal misjudgment as he did in "Little Children" - but he doesn't, which makes "Tár" rather distant and cold. Field expects viewers to interpret a lot on their own, which is bold and demanding, but with this approach it is crucial to keep focus on an underlying message, otherwise it gets lost.

In conclusion, "Tár" has all the ingredients for a masterpiece - interesting characters, great performances, nice camerawork - but weak storytelling ultimately reduces the film's potential.

How much you enjoy Tar will depend largely on how you feel about a film that begins with the credits. There's good reason for it (everything in Tar is considered down to the smallest detail) but if you can't get on board with that kind of self indulgence then you are in for a long two and a half hours.

One of the reasons for beginning with the credits may be that we are about witness a career in reverse. An opening interview lets us know that Lydia Tar is at the top of her profession, a conductor with a dream resume and an EGOT who is about to complete her masterpiece symphony recording. Over the next couple of hours we see her slipping down the mountain as past deeds and the way she treats people in general come back to take a bite out of her perfect life.

The film solely follows Kate Blanchett's Tar for the entire runtime, we see all events from her perspective and she is in every scene. Blanchett put its an astounding performance, indeed it is hard to imagine many, if any, other actors who could have been up to the task. That the whole show rests on such a powerful but subtle turn is Tar's greatest strength but also its only real weakness. Its a nuanced performance that fits perfectly but added to the characters flawed nature it can at times leave proceedings feeling cold and hard to connect with emotionally. Like its titular character Tar is a film of craftmanship and intellect not emotion, although the themes of hierarchy dynamics and abuse are powerful.

If you can get on board with the full force filmaking style then you will find Tar a breathtaking wonder of a movie with something to think about in every scene and something to ponder long after the (second lot of) credits roll.

9 successful recordings out of 10 symphonies.

Tár is a dense film. Thick with dialogue and emotional power. It's also a bit tricky to get in to and might be a bit much for the casual viewer. That's a shame though as it's great. Lydia Tár (Cate Blanchett) is a renowned concert conductor. An opening montage leads us into a live interview with the New Yorker, introducing her achievements to date. Let's just say it's a stellar CV. Right from the off, Tár is a force. Confident and assertive, but there are hints of the smallest of cracks. People will often misunderstand the role of a conductor, reducing it to something almost needless. Director and writer Todd Field knows this and lets that opening interview roll, as a device it not only introduces us to Tár, but the world of classical orchestration and her interpretation of it. Like I said, dense. At the top of her game, there's plenty of admirers, both publicly and professionally. Like Elliot Kaplan (Mark Strong) with a fantastic wig, who's told "There's no glory for a robot, do your own thing". Or a room full of nervous students at Juilliard, who also feel the wrath of Tár's uncompromising views. She's putting a lot of herself out there, is she as certain of herself as she appears though and when everything appears so perfect and controlled, what aren't we seeing. Those potential cracks show themselves through Francesca (Noémie Merlant), she's the assistant. Seemingly subordinate, she's clearly privy to some weakness, could be the weakness, or quite the opposite. Tár's partner Sharon (Nina Hoss) too. She has a fragility and brings out a tenderness in Tár, but there's something else. It's clear that Tár intends on retaining her position, status, power. Ruthlessly if required. These personal moments though really help the flow of this film. Although slightly bleak, they're a breath of fresh air in Tár's austere world. It's a beautiful world though. Rooms vast with modernist lines and understated grandeur. I find myself lost in these spaces as Tár too begins to ebb. I can imagine that classical music students might lap the opening acts up, it feels important. Is it though, or is it an impenetrable pretentious three hour indulgence. I'd say it's neither. It's a slow burning drama. That doesn't so much as unfold as gently slides into a darkness as Tár's facade crumbles. Accelerated by the arrival Olga (Sophie Kauer) a no nonsense Russian cellist, brought in to help a live performance recording of Mahler's Symphony No.5... but is anything but a stabilising presence. It demands your attention. Blanchett is incredible. It's an explosive performance. Utterly captivating. A singular pivotal presence. "It's not a democracy". She needs to be too. At not far off 3 hours, it's an intense experience. Be prepared to be patient, but you will be rewarded.

During the first minute of this film, Cate Blanchett shows what an extraordinary actress she is. Her character, star conductor Lydia Tár, is waiting to go onstage. There is no dialogue, only body language. But even without words, Blanchett shows what Tár thinks and feels.

Blanchett's remarkable performance is a large part of what makes this a good movie. But there's more. The very clever script gives us a lot to chew on afterards. Tár is a woman in the men-dominated world of classical music. She's not warm, empathic or even very sympathetic. In fact, she has many characteristics that are usually associated with men. She's vain, selfish and manipulative. And that's what gets her in trouble. At the start of the film, she seems to be one of the most admired women in the world. She is extremely famous and successful. At the end, everything has fallen apart.

The film doesn't judge. It leaves it up to the viewer to decide if Lydia Tár is a victim or a culprit. Or maybe both at the same time. The viewer gets a lot of information to make up his (or her) mind. Director Todd Field gives us the story elements slowly, bit by bit. Take the scene where Lydia Tár gives a stern speech to a young girl who bullies her daughter. It shows that she is used to getting everyone in line, according to her wishes. That's useful information to interpret things later on in the movie.

Tár is very much a modern movie. It has things to say about gender, about power, about social media, about being woke. But at the same time, it's a very old-fashioned movie. It takes its time. There are long scenes, and long takes. There's nothing modern in the way it is filmed. And that's a good thing.

I watched Tár over the course of a few hours, frequently pausing the film and watching something else, then coming back to it. Or taking a nap. I don't think calling this movie boring is that controversial; the first 40 minutes of the film are deliberately difficult, an excruciatingly long interview opens the film and it's follow quickly by a dinner conversation that goes on for way too long.

To say Tár did not need to be 2 hrs and 37 minutes long would be beating a dead horse. Of course it didn't need to be. It is beause it reflects the sort of pretentious, grandiose person Lydia Tár is. Tár, at its core, is a character study and a parable about modern times; a film about cancel culture and the accountability of cultural icons.

Cate Blanchett truly disappears into this role and delivers a powerhouse performance here. It's hard not to sound like a broken record, but she really becomes Lydia. There's an amazing physicality to her performance along with her incredible affectations and ability to portray Tár consistently, even whilst speaking different languages.

I also found the film's sometimes meandering pace to be compelling as it gave us a chance to get to know people without necessarily figuring out where they all fit in Tár's life. It really made the film feel like a slice of life, where the story has a lot of context before the movie begins, and will go on after (naturally, given the ending).

It's also a very well made film; the cinematography and sound design, thankfully, are impeccable. You really get sucked into whatever room you're in and there's an overbearing sense of atmosphere, a coldness associated with the refined world of classical music.

Yet, this is also a movie I'd probably never watch again. It does a lot quite well, but is too simple a plot to waste so much time. Most of the other um...non, Tár characters, are pretty paper thin and we don't really have any particular subplots or complex relationship dynamics. As the movie lurches towards its end, I felt like it implies a strong emotional connection to what's happening, but it never really made it.

This is a story that could've been told in a very conventional, straightforward way, but it's smarter than that. It takes a pretty nuanced and difficult-to-discuss subject and tackles it head on, but in a way that feels as if it's an aspect of the character's life and not the whole thing. Tár, like many Oscar bait films, has a lot to appreciate. But, I genuinely don't believe it's the sort of film many people will honestly remember and appreciate years down the road.

Director Todd Field is undeniably up to something different with his new film 'Tar'. Though what it is he's actually up to, what his goal is, I couldn't say. One thing for sure, It's strange. Very. And another thing for sure, it don't work.

Proof?

The first seven minutes are dedicated to scrolling the film's credits. No, not credits for Kate Blanchette and the rest of the cast. I'm talking about Key Grip, Best Boy, Stunt Man #1: the stuff you normally see at a film's conclusion: if you stick around for the credits.

The film's next fifteen minutes feature a one on one interview between the film's protagonist Ms. Tar (Blanchette) and New Yorker Columnist Adam Gopnik (playing himself). The two are seated on an auditorium's stage, the audience silent, Ms. Blanchette / Tar fiercely intense as the Philharmonic Conductor describes her craft. This goes on far longer than you expect. And, in my opinion, far longer than necessary.

The next segment is a lunch or dinner at which Ms. Tar and an associate (Who is he? I don't know. But I should.) discuss the politics and interpersonal relationships going on in Ms. Tar's Orchestra: The Berlin Philharmonic. The viewer is a fly on the wall to this gossip. We have to listen closely because much is mumbled. But never mind: the people gossiped about are people we don't know (yet) and so we - as in 'I' - tune out (perhaps a mistake but I could not help it). There are innuendoes a'plenty here; we learn that Ms. Tar is a lesbian and the man sitting across from her might be, or might once have been, attracted to men.

Here, at about the thirty to forty minute mark, I considered leaving. But I didn't. You, however, may give in to the inclination to draw fresh air and frankly I would not blame you. But if you do consider leaving, let me tell you this:

1. The rest of the film moves at a faster pace. Much faster. In fact the longer it goes, the faster the pace.

2. Ms. Blanchette is, in fact, as fabulous as you've undoubtedly read. If you do stay, stay for her performance, not the story.

3. The gossip you overheard at that lunch / dinner table? As the film progresses it will begin to make sense to you. Completely? No. But somewhat.

4. Conductor Tar is a mighty presence with an 'Achilles Heel'. And that weakness has gotten her into a bit of trouble. But exactly what it is she did - I mean exactly - remains somehow vague. We never doubt her weaknesses, but would probably benefit from some more detail. Such as, What was her relationship to the person who got Tar into trouble. Was the person a student? A member of the symphony?

5. The scenes of Blanchette / Tar conducting the orchestra are fine. They are not jaw-droppingly sensational (as other critics would have you believe). In short, I was. Disappointed.

The way I see it, if you're reading this review it's likely you've already decided to see it. And if that's the case I hope this will assist you in adjusting your expectations. 'Adjusting', as in lowering.

If you are not familiar with classical music, probably almost the entire first hour will be very difficult to sit through. The dialogue is PACKED with references to classical music artists/works/history/etc. Not to mention there are constant little allusions to different plot threads which make up Tar's whole story.

However, this dies down gradually and the movie becomes much more focused and simple. Blanchett is incredible, but not in a showy way at all. Her conducting moments were awesome. The story is political and relevant, and handled very well and balanced-like.

There is a surprisingly creepy vibe to the film, that borders on something almost like a horror movie at times. It's quite unnerving.

One of the best movies i've seen all year! Probably Todd Field's best work yet.

I've been craving a truly great, sophisticated drama lately and this movie gave me everything I've been looking for. Great acting, great writing, great directing & just an overall expertly crafted film in every sense. Cate & Todd are at the top of their game here and it's simply beautiful to watch. Highly recommend watching this in a theatre if it's playing anywhere near you. This movie is gorgeous enough to watch on the big screen.

This movie really just has a lot of emotion that's been missing from movies these days. I think a lot of people are really glad that movie theatres are back after two years of lockdowns and mandates, but there's been so much great stuff coming out that's made being a movie goer exciting again. Tar is an excellent movie theatre experience.

Cate Blanchett is almost always a phnomenal actress, and in Tár she lives up to my expectations, as do the other actors. The cinematography, the decor, the pacing it is all spot on. Yet this movie never got to me. Despite all it's doing good, this movie never made me want to recommend it to friends and family. I left the theater very underwhelmed. And if you take in account all the other boxes that the movie does tick, it becomes even more frustrating. And I like pretentious arthouse films like no other. I liked the classical music babble in the beginning. I like the psycholigical aspect. I just cound't stand the emptiness and the fact that it never really leads to anywhere. If that was the the whole point then it is brilliantly done. The thing is, I go to the movies and pay (more and more) money for a ticket to be entertained, and I simply wasn't. A 6 out of 10 solely for the acting and cinematography. 4 points deduction for the monotony and emptiness.

Movie really has an effect on you, it's something you haven't seen before. Character doesn't seem sympathetic but that's what makes Cate's acting something amazing to behold. Nuance and layers she has in this film is nothing short of a master class acting. She really walks subtlety with this character warrants, it's not an easy thing for actor to pull off, cate's operate on level of something so different, maybe that's why she's considered to be one of the greatest actress of all time if not the greatest. She owns the screen and she's in every frame of the movie, really got DDL there will be blood thing going on. Amazing amazing movie, side characters also gave their best, especially Nina hoss, who plays her partner. Merlant and newcomer Sophie are amazing as well.

I'm glad Todd field came back and gave this gem.

I implore reviewers to really experience this movie, don't be influenced by others, just see it for yourself.

I'm in the minority, but I found this movie a CHORE to get through. Yes, Cate Blanchett is great, and her performance is the best thing about the movie. Tar is an interesting character. No, she's not likeable, but why should she be? Jake LaMotta isn't likeable but Raging Bull is a great movie. The problem is, in order to bring her down, Tod Field creates a RIDICULOUS contrived plot that only borders on reality. Visually, it seems to be about Tar's descent into madness, which would be fun if it had anything to do with the rest of the movie. Instead, the nightmare scenes seem to be nothing but ... nghtmares? This was a huge disappointment.

For every era of cinematic history, there are the films that decades later people look at them as the ones that showed a period in time for how it was. Tar will be remembered as one of the movies that defined the early 2020s. It's a complex character study that refuses to take a side, one that shows a deeply complicated person for who she is. This is a downfall story (you can see why Scorsese called it his favorite movie of the year), in which highly successful composer/conductor Lydia Tar falls from grace after allegations (that may or may not be true) emerge that she had a sexual relationship with a student, Krista Taylor, that ended in her suicide. It's an intensely psychological film, with a thin line between what is literally and not literally happening.

An intense character study by definition needs to be driven by a strong performance, and Cate Blanchett delivers not only the best performance of her career, but also the best performance of the year. Every part of her masterful performance is believable. At times she does not seem like a movie character as much as a real person whose life is being broadcast. She is equal parts powerful yet vulnerable, imposing yet fragile, villain yet victim. Blanchett humanizes Lydia Tar and all of her faults in a way that very few completely fictional movie characters are.

Tar is a film driven by well-handled juxtapositions. The primary example (as well as the most successful) is the aforementioned aspects of Lydia Tar's character. The setting of present day Berlin adds to the juxtaposition. It's one of Europe's premier cultural cities, but yet the aesthetic of the film turns it into a claustrophobic, lifeless prison. Even the concert hall of the Berlin Philharmonic, one of the most important venues in classical music, feels limiting. And then, of course, there's the ending. All I'll say is that it took us gamers by surprise.

It is perhaps unexpected for a movie that takes aim at cancel culture to gain traction in the way that Tar did. At a time when people fall in line with hiveminds and nuance is nonexistent, Tar is a movie that shows the deep complications of the human condition, where no one is all good, and no one is all bad. This is a distinctly contemporary aspect that adds a new layer to the classic downfall story, a character arc that has been told for millennia. The corrupting nature of power never changes; Citizen Kane is as relevant now as it was in 1941. The message here is clear: power corrupts not only the individual, but the masses as well.

One of the best things about Tar is the power of what is not shown. Krista Taylor's face does not appear on screen even once. Her voice is never heard either. She is the downfall of Lydia Tar and one of the most important characters in the movie and is completely invisible, and it works perfectly well. This aids the unbiased look at Lydia, by blocking any possibility of our own biases being affected by Krista as a character. Mahler's music is the perfect choice for this movie, as he was one of the great composers of the Romantic era, and is very emotionally driven, especially that 5th Symphony.

In a few decades, people will still be talking about Tar. People will associate Tar with the 2020s the same way they associate Taxi Driver with 1970s urban America, or even Caligari to the Weimar Republic. It will be a window into today's world for future generations. It's a great film back by a fantastic performance that handles its subject matter very well. This is the best film of 2022.

As life-long classical music lovers, movie buffs and great fans of Cate Blanchett, my husband and I made sure that we saw "Tar" on the first day that it came out. We have never been quite so disappointed as we are with this movie. It a disgrace to the classical music world, which is filled with the most professional and talented people, who create beautiful music for their audiences throughout the world. Ms. Blanchett did not seem to have ever been near any musicians nor sat in any audience of the many great orchestras worldwide. This is a movie part where the star cant possibly "fake" her experience in music. Too bad!

'Tár', one of the most talked about films of 2022 and a serious contender for the Academy Awards, with six nominations, is written and directed by Todd Field - a filmmaker who does not seem at all rushed or prone to accumulate impressive numbers in his filmography. In fact 'Tár' is only his third feature film and it is made 16 years after the previous one. The fictional biography of a great musician - symphony orchestra conductor - 'Tár' seems and was written for Cate Blanchett and suits her to such an extent that after watching it it is hard to imagine another actress in this role. It's a complex and loooooong film (yes, that's its main problem!) which in almost three hours of projection manages to bring to the screen a multitude of problems related to the world of great musicians and the way they combine their careers with their personal lives, about the place of women in a competitive world where private lives are scrutinized and mistakes are not forgiven, about the role of media and social networks in celebrity careers, and about political correctness and its verdicts in the public square of the Internet age. Above all, however, it is a film about the power games in the fascinating and complicated world of great art.

The titular heroine of the film, Lydia Tár, seems to be a model of success in every way. A student of Leonard Berstein, she is one of the world's great conductors, winner of all possible awards, principal conductor of the Berlin Orchestra and professor at Julliard. She has, of course, had to work hard and fight fiercely for this position, as a woman and as a lesbian (her partner is the concertmaster of the orchestra), but the beginning of the film catches her at her peak and the past is not mentioned until it begins to insinuate in the present. Relationships with his daughter, an elementary school student, indicate traumas in the distant past. A conductor with whom she had a more recent relationship pursues her obsessively, and Lydia retaliates by blocking her artistic career. Her position of power seems to allow all but also requires her to make decisions that do not always seem completely professionally motivated. Sometimes it seems that she uses her power to fuel personal passions, but everything happens in an ambiguous zone. Her faithful assistant is skipped by her from a promotion, an instrumentalist in the orchestra is loses to a younger candidate the opportunity to perform a concert, in one of the lessons at Julliard she adopts a very politically incorrect attitude in a dialogue with a student. These are small and debatable incidents, but in all cases the decisions are hers alone. Perfectionism can be a great quality of a conductor who must have absolute control over every sound, tempo and nuance in a concert or recording. But life is more complicated, even than a Mahler symphony.

Director Todd Field seems to have drawn himself inspiration from his character, making some creative decisions that influence how the film looks. However, not all of them are for the benefit of the movie, some seemed questionable to me. The film begins with the credits that usually roll at the end, when the lights come up and the audience leaves the theater. It's a nice sign of respect for the technical team, but should this take precedence over the spectators in the cinema halls? The length of the film far exceeds that of Mahler's symphonies. Yes, this is the fashion in Hollywood, but here I feel that more brevity would have served the film. The first half hour seems like a docu-drama (an excellent one, by the way) about the life of a great musician, and another hour or so passes - spent in the stratosphere of the world of great musicians, in concert halls and luxurious apartments where the pianos don't even fill the spaces, until the drama really kicks off. Indeed, when events rush headlong, we are dealing with a genuine drama, which calls into question the entire world of intellectual and material luxury in which we had been immersed until then. The filming style also changes, from documentary style and long one-shots (see the Julliard scene) in the first part, to nervous editing with action film techniques. Neither the world of music with its intrigues and power games, nor that of the media and social media that can destroy lives and careers come out well in the story conceived by screenwriter Todd Field. The generosity in duration allows for the construction of several memorable roles - mostly feminine. I don't know if Cate Blanchett will get the Best Actress Academy Award this year again (it would be her third time), but her role seemed to me one of the best of a career in which I don't remember any failures or miscasts. I'd rather bet on the award for original script. We will see. In any case, 'Tár' is one of the most interesting films of the year, but also one of those that demands the attention and patience of the viewers. Using, again, the metaphor of Mahler's music, just as his symphonies are not liked by every classical music-loving audience, this film is not intended for every moviegoer. But those who like it, will like it a lot.

Tár is a very strong character study. With not only the drama and psychological turmoil but also a hint of paranoia and thriller elements. Tár manages to do this mostly through directing and a incredible performance from Blanchett.

I doubt this review will be very long because once I understood it as a character study type of movie I knew I would be a bit biased against it, not fairly. It's just not always my cup of tea and they leave me a bit unsatisfied. This movie does everything to not be boring though. The night sequences and the constant dreary paranoia help immerse you into this long sitting. So I didn't get bored with it.

Blanchett gives a killer performance really can't be understated how she carries this movie. Not that others in it are bad. But because she overpowers it all. Convincingly. The small things and details she does, just fantastic. You have to notice.

To my surprise you'd think a movie about a conductor would be filled to the brim with music. Not the case here, there's a much lighter tone and only a few musical moments, that also last for just a few seconds. The remainder is filled a with a hum, or silence. Staying grounded.

The story was intriguing and creepy, it stayed that way. But for me it lost the intrigue along the way. And became a little bland as a story later on sadly. I wished I liked this more.

I went to this movie with great anticipation. As a classical music devotee, I was also anxious to see how it figured into the narrative. Yes, Cate Blanchett is fantastic in an Oscar-worthy performance, and other actors are fine as well. But good acting in a bad film isn't enough. The film is a tedious, pretentious mess, and worse, for the first two hours, it's boring. (For someone who knows or cares little about classical music, it must be painful.) Short scenes interspersed within the narrative are neither meaningful nor symbolic-- they just go nowhere and feel like self-indulgent artsiness. We learn much about Tár's ascendency to the top tier of her profession (as if someone is reading her Wikipedia page to us) but learn nothing about why Tár is the miserable human being she is. If it's simply meant to be a portrait of an unlikeable, imperious, narcissistic, and cruel personality, it generally succeeds. If it's a commentary of "me-too" and cancel culture, it's superficial at best. If we're supposed to care about her or her life, it fails. James Levine--been there, done that.