Settlers traveling through the Oregon desert in 1845 find themselves stranded in harsh conditions.Settlers traveling through the Oregon desert in 1845 find themselves stranded in harsh conditions.Settlers traveling through the Oregon desert in 1845 find themselves stranded in harsh conditions.
- Awards
- 7 wins & 14 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaLoosely based on a true incident involving trail guide Stephen Meek and a band of settlers in 1845.
- GoofsIn an early scene with the three women walking, there was abundant Russian thistle on the ground. The film was set in 1845, but Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) wasn't introduced to the United States until arriving in South Dakota in 1870 or 1874, as weed seed in flaxseed imported from Russia.
- Quotes
[last lines]
Stephen Meek: I'm taking my orders from you now, Mr. Tetherow. Miss Tetherow. And we're all taking our orders from him, I'd say.
[about the Indian walking ahead]
Stephen Meek: We're all just playing our parts now. This was written long before we got here. I'm at your command.
- ConnectionsFeatured in At the Movies: Venice Film Festival 2010 (2010)
Featured review
Contrary to many other reviews, I do not urge you to see this. Sure, there is some sparse filmmaking that conveys a landscape, the experience of vicariously inhabiting for a while. But there are so many other sojourns to take into untravelled edges of the map - Malick, Herzog, Weir, etc - that actually quench the thirst, that I see little reason to parch with this.
So the scout leading the band of godfearing settlers to Oregon is lean, craggy, violent, the kind of person who blazed the trails now traveled by civilization. But now it's the turn of the younger man who instead of kicking around the Indian can barter with him for directions. Do you see how thin, how schematic?
There is the reversal of western modes that we sensibly expect from a western at this time and age; we're with the women's point-of-view for all this, relegated to merely observing from a little out of way as the men lay down the plans for what the world should be. Oh, we see them to be thoroughly clueless to even decide which way to circle around a riverbed.
As for the ending, suitably vague, we can surmise the outcome by our knowledge of history. Who got eventually swept aside in the race for modern civilization, who made it to the other end. Who merely vanished with the land.
Could it be the female, caring hand behind the film, that can't bring herself to wreak real havoc upon these lives? Because it's all strangely lethargic, of course like the journey itself some will insist. But where is the dread? Notice, by contrast, how masculine felt Valhalla Rising from last year - another mixed film from the same mould.
Or maybe it's simply this particular filmmaker, female or not, who can get on the road but is unsure where to lead us, or if at all. There is precious little in the way of visual metaphor, recurring pattern, or introspection that takes us to the bottom of things.
It's a rather hollow thing, the low rumbling of wagon-wheels on flat wilderness, scattered with a few evocative moods. It was perhaps unavoidable that the fashionably minimal would come out West.
I recommend that you rewatch Tree of Life - since this ends with the image of one - or skip ahead to Tarr who, if nothing else, at least is not lukewarm about the void, but at the same time I don't want to dissuade you. By all means.
So the scout leading the band of godfearing settlers to Oregon is lean, craggy, violent, the kind of person who blazed the trails now traveled by civilization. But now it's the turn of the younger man who instead of kicking around the Indian can barter with him for directions. Do you see how thin, how schematic?
There is the reversal of western modes that we sensibly expect from a western at this time and age; we're with the women's point-of-view for all this, relegated to merely observing from a little out of way as the men lay down the plans for what the world should be. Oh, we see them to be thoroughly clueless to even decide which way to circle around a riverbed.
As for the ending, suitably vague, we can surmise the outcome by our knowledge of history. Who got eventually swept aside in the race for modern civilization, who made it to the other end. Who merely vanished with the land.
Could it be the female, caring hand behind the film, that can't bring herself to wreak real havoc upon these lives? Because it's all strangely lethargic, of course like the journey itself some will insist. But where is the dread? Notice, by contrast, how masculine felt Valhalla Rising from last year - another mixed film from the same mould.
Or maybe it's simply this particular filmmaker, female or not, who can get on the road but is unsure where to lead us, or if at all. There is precious little in the way of visual metaphor, recurring pattern, or introspection that takes us to the bottom of things.
It's a rather hollow thing, the low rumbling of wagon-wheels on flat wilderness, scattered with a few evocative moods. It was perhaps unavoidable that the fashionably minimal would come out West.
I recommend that you rewatch Tree of Life - since this ends with the image of one - or skip ahead to Tarr who, if nothing else, at least is not lukewarm about the void, but at the same time I don't want to dissuade you. By all means.
- chaos-rampant
- Aug 14, 2011
- Permalink
- How long is Meek's Cutoff?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Meek's Oregon 1845 Cutoff
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $977,772
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $20,024
- Apr 10, 2011
- Gross worldwide
- $1,205,257
- Runtime1 hour 44 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content