User reviews

THE VANQUISHER is possibly the worst Thai film I've ever watched, and I've sat through some of their dodgy horror and ghost flicks in my time. This low budget action film is basically the Thai version of THE BOURNE IDENTITY. It stars Sophita Sriban (wooden) as a member of an assassin squad, working for the CIA, who is betrayed and left for dead by her own team leader (the equally wooden Jacqui A. Thananon).

Years later, the hunt for Middle Eastern terrorist Wajib sees the two cross paths once more as they become caught up in a needlessly complicated storyline involving the CIA, a crusading police squad, hired mercenaries, and a gang of evil Japanese ninjas. The plotting is completely confusing and doesn't seem to make much sense, leading me to scratch my head for the most part.

If you thought the writing was bad, check out the action sequences. They're hideously conceived and directed in the most awful way imaginable. Occasionally a scene of gob-smacking awfulness comes along (the CGI train, for instance) to distract you from the general inanity of it all for a few minutes, but only for a few minutes. But then you're back in the B-movie universe of Thai cinema, where the actresses struggle to speak their English lines phonetically and have zero inflection in their voices. It does pick up slightly - very slightly - in the last half an hour, but this is never anything less than a complete dud.

First of all, I must say that oddly enough the DVD movie I bought from Amazon is titled "The Vanquisher", and not "Final Target", so I had to do an actor search on IMDb in order to find the right movie. (And I will go with "The Vanquisher" title in this review.)

There is no doubt about it that this is an all out action movie from start to end, and the action was actually quite good and full of adrenaline. There was a lot of sword fighting in the movie, which was nice, aside from the slightly overdone sword sounds. And being a Thai movie, of course you have martial arts in it as well, and that too was also nicely made and choreographed. And finally, lots and lots of gun fights with all manner of weapons, ranging from handguns to LAWs.

Now, that being said, then it must be said that there is almost no storyline here in "The Vanquisher". There is something about terrorism and four different groups/factions chasing after something. And that was about, and to make matters worse, then there was absolutely no coherent red line in the storyline, the movie was jumping all over the place, trying to tie four different angles into the storyline, but failing miserably. So basically, it was all just about showing as much action as possible in 89 minutes.

"The Vanquisher" keeps jumping back and forth between Thai, English and Japanese language, which was a nice enough attempt, in theory. But the end result in the movie made it confusing and a messy one. Especially the English, sure I can relate to Asians pronouncing English oddly (as I used to live in Hong Kong), but when put in a movie, at least make a proper effort. Most of the times, is was like they just said something they had been instructed and taught, having no clue what they were saying at all.

The language was one barrier in the movie, but the scripted dialogue itself just added to the abysmal horror. The dialogue was so forced and unnatural, halting at times, it was really gruesome to sit there and witness at times.

What makes it worth to sit through "The Vanquisher" is the non-stop action, and of course the cat-fights (which I am sure there is a massive audience out there for).

Put your mind on pause and just lean back and enjoy the adrenaline-packed action ride, because "The Vanquisher" is nothing more than just that.

The version I saw of this movie was dubbed in Hindi with no English subtitles so I'm not really sure what it's about. I think the leading lady works for the CIA in Bangkok ? Anyhow it's got some pretty women in it. And if you stick with it the ending is pretty good with a lot of swordplay and fire.

Everything about this movie is bad , from the cinematic's to the bad acting to the apparent low budget, other than the experience I do not understand why anybody would make a movie like this.

I would honestly not even waste 2 hours of my time to watch this.

I lasted 19 minutes and 14 seconds. That was all I could take. And I watched all of Ishtar, so I've seen some garbage.

The action has potential but doesn't come close to reaching it.

On the acting, think William Shatner's stilted, halting speech pattern but greatly and grossly exaggerated at times.

There were several plot lines introduced in the short time I watched. I am clueless about the direction it was going, so I gave up.

All in all, this just really wasn't a good movie.

A terrible ,poorly made movie not Kung Fu, I wouldn't dare disgrace the genre. an action thriller perhaps ?if it was I wouldn't have half slept through it ..state of the standard of movies to come ?no ..please . I hope not ..

Oh no.

Noting the poor reception, nonetheless I had to ask myself, "how bad could it be?" We find out quickly exactly how bad it can be. Even in the very first scene, before two minutes have passed, one begins to understand how fundamentally troubled this film is going to be. I trust that the cast would demonstrate greater skills if given the opportunity to do so. I trust that as both writer and director Manop Udomdej has learned from their experiences here, and has grown in their skills in the subsequent years. I trust that the film, as we see it, reflects modest means and resources. I trust that all those involved would do better, if they had the chance to prove it. None of this changes the fact that from the very, very start, 'Vanquisher' is laborious and almost unwatchable.

Udomdej's direction results in acting and pacing that are terribly stilted, and sometimes acting that's direly forced and overblown. Their screenplay is no better, however, with awful, hackneyed, amateurish dialogue and scene writing, stock characters, and to be blunt, poor elucidation of the story at any given time; the narrative is incohesive and incoherent, struggles to feel complete on a basic level, and seems to throw in action sequences on a whim rather than attach them to the tale. Marketing plays up the involvement of women as action heroes, yet the script treats them like faceless agents of Something Or Other, and the camera illustrates loathsome male gaze in no few instances. I can forgive a cookie cutter Action Flick narrative, but that doesn't exactly help this title's case, either, least of all with meek, flimsy, unconvincing, and choppy plot development. The whole feature is majorly overproduced, betraying the inauthenticity, often (and inconsistently) with a soft, waxy sheen lying over the whole affair (and conversely, sometimes with a look and feel so barren and plainspoken as to almost hurt one's eyes). The CGI is painfully obvious, and for as overproduced as 'Vanquisher' is, even scenes that don't employ CGI often look just as fake and unbelievable. All this applies equally to stunts and effects. Moreover, between the fundamental visual appearance, the chewing of scenery that characterizes the performances, the lousy script, the overbearing and stuttered direction - and the use of slow motion in action sequences - I can only suppose that Udomdej matriculated from the Zack Snyder school of film-making, where style is prioritized over substance and even the style is rotten. In the very least, I readily thought of '300,' which is unquestionably one of the worst pictures I've ever seen. In some ways this 2009 flick might even have a leg up on the latter abomination, though unfortunately, overall, they're pretty much right on par.

The production design is meager (again I assume limited resources). The cinematography and editing are both equally overzealous and far too excitable, often dicing into mincemeat sequences that should elicit excitement and inspire engagement. The music is mostly very dull, bland, and repetitive. Even the credits, built-in subtitles, and text identifying the setting - words laid over top of the image - seem feeble and unprofessional, the work of someone without any experience. Where the pacing isn't stilted, it's rushed; Udomdej uses too many takes in which lines are flubbed, and one can only assume they never gave the actors even a second take to get it right. The result of all this is that ninety minutes crawl, tortuously, with storytelling that's hopelessly sloppy and weak, and film-making that frankly and pointedly recalls The Asylum, Uncork'd Entertainment, or maybe Uwe Boll as much as it does Zack Snyder. Ouch.

Judgment is rendered by the time only one-third of the length has elapsed, and that damning impression will not change. 'Vanquisher' is not representative of Thai cinema in its entirety, and we must be thankful for this. It is, however, representative of low-grade pablum (to the point of nearly being self-parodying) that reflects poorly on everyone who participated in its creation, whether they were witting perpetrators or unwitting victims. I earnestly wish only the best for all, and may they show their quality in other movies. Though nothing here came out well, I recognize the shadow of skill that had the potential to churn out a quality action thriller, and there is scattered value that almost rescues the picture from the bottom of the barrel. Yet the key word is "almost." No one needs to watch this, except as an example of How Not To Make Movies. Whatever it is you were hoping to get from it, I strongly advise that you look anywhere else. 'Vanquisher' is rubbish, and it belongs where all other rubbish goes.