IMDb RATING
3.8/10
1.4K
YOUR RATING
An Alaskan town is in danger of destruction by a mystical snow globe that appears on a family's doorstep, wrapped like a Christmas gift, and causes deadly "natural" disasters in the real wor... Read allAn Alaskan town is in danger of destruction by a mystical snow globe that appears on a family's doorstep, wrapped like a Christmas gift, and causes deadly "natural" disasters in the real world, while simultaneously occurring in the globe.An Alaskan town is in danger of destruction by a mystical snow globe that appears on a family's doorstep, wrapped like a Christmas gift, and causes deadly "natural" disasters in the real world, while simultaneously occurring in the globe.
Jeffrey Ballard
- Derrick Reed
- (as Jeff C. Ballard)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Just as I was getting the smell of xmas spice candles out of my clothes along comes a wintery Christmas movie courtesy of the Scyfy channel.
This Canadian made movie stars Laura "The Faculty" Harris and tells the odd tale of a snow globe that inflicts natural disasters on the town.
Scyfy originals have a really bad rap, I personally find them entertaining enough with the rare exceptions (Sharknado I'm looking at you). I consider them charming dumb fun and this is a fine example.
Snowmageddon is slightly above par, yes it has weak sfx and yes the whole thing is head scratchingly stupid in places but there is certainly entertainment to be found.
If you like Scyfy's goofy movies then you'll like this, if not then perhaps steer clear.
The Good:
Some good ideas
Cast do a great job
Scyfy charm
The Bad:
Usual ropey sfx
This Canadian made movie stars Laura "The Faculty" Harris and tells the odd tale of a snow globe that inflicts natural disasters on the town.
Scyfy originals have a really bad rap, I personally find them entertaining enough with the rare exceptions (Sharknado I'm looking at you). I consider them charming dumb fun and this is a fine example.
Snowmageddon is slightly above par, yes it has weak sfx and yes the whole thing is head scratchingly stupid in places but there is certainly entertainment to be found.
If you like Scyfy's goofy movies then you'll like this, if not then perhaps steer clear.
The Good:
Some good ideas
Cast do a great job
Scyfy charm
The Bad:
Usual ropey sfx
I thought based on the title and premise I knew what 'Snowmageddon' was going to be, yet for better or worse, this isn't what I was expecting. On the one hand, there's a definite sense of oneupmanship here, like someone looked at the core idea and said "Nah, it can't be JUST a magic snow globe." In no time the movie shifts from the sphere of mere fantasy (a magic item causing mayhem) to pure sci-fi disaster bluster in terms of being an effects-laden extravaganza, with some ideas included with an apparent pathos of "sure, why not." On the other hand, this disaster flick is far more paced and measured than I'd have ever assumed of SyFy fare, almost to its detriment as there's a weird lag in some moments and between discrete events. And at the same time, writer Rudy Thauberger also tries to squeeze in tabletop gaming and Greek mythology as plot ideas? I suppose I should give credit where it's due, because even if this picture doesn't meet with success, the frivolous amalgamation of disparate flavors is still original in its own curious way. It's just that there's so much going on here, a peculiar mishmash that just kind of ranges all over - yet without achieving any major notes of vibrancy, even at its most outrageous.
As much as the film rather just throws ideas at a wall to see what sticks, it's hard as a viewer to really get a grip on anything firm to hold onto in terms of the writing. I really get a sense that much the same was true for the cast, and even director Sheldon Wilson; they do the best they can with the material they're given, but 'Snowmageddon' is such a strange hodgepodge that the most anyone can hope for is to make each individual scene count rather than try to get something out of their characters or the narrative as a whole. This is true not least given the CGI that greets us in each progressive step of the fanciful catastrophe; there's only so much the best professionals can do when greeted with the quandary of reacting to imaginary nothings that will be added in post-production. Some of those digital creations look better than others, but under the circumstances, that's only saying so much.
At least the production design and art direction look nice, and the special makeup. I do actually like the varied thoughts that went into the feature, even if they don't gel together. I don't think 'Snowmageddon' is altogether awful, and I don't think there's particular blame to be laid at anyone's feet. This isn't even a problem of being a TV movie per se - but for everything that the feature tries to roll together, it's a heterogeneous kluge that never quite blends. I appreciate the effort, and the work everyone put into it. Better luck next time, I guess.
As much as the film rather just throws ideas at a wall to see what sticks, it's hard as a viewer to really get a grip on anything firm to hold onto in terms of the writing. I really get a sense that much the same was true for the cast, and even director Sheldon Wilson; they do the best they can with the material they're given, but 'Snowmageddon' is such a strange hodgepodge that the most anyone can hope for is to make each individual scene count rather than try to get something out of their characters or the narrative as a whole. This is true not least given the CGI that greets us in each progressive step of the fanciful catastrophe; there's only so much the best professionals can do when greeted with the quandary of reacting to imaginary nothings that will be added in post-production. Some of those digital creations look better than others, but under the circumstances, that's only saying so much.
At least the production design and art direction look nice, and the special makeup. I do actually like the varied thoughts that went into the feature, even if they don't gel together. I don't think 'Snowmageddon' is altogether awful, and I don't think there's particular blame to be laid at anyone's feet. This isn't even a problem of being a TV movie per se - but for everything that the feature tries to roll together, it's a heterogeneous kluge that never quite blends. I appreciate the effort, and the work everyone put into it. Better luck next time, I guess.
One awful disaster movie, with no explanations poor acting and clearly not worth the two hours it takes to watch it on TV. No connection is ever made to explain the connection between the snow globe and the disasters in the town, no explanation of why it was ever created or who might have brought these on the towns folk.
The viewer is clearly in danger of losing whatever intelligence they may have by watch this movie so run, don't walk away from it! Mysterious cracks show up all around the town with fire and yet there is no offer of how or why. Mysteriously trees pop out of the ground in random places that skewer folks and cars.
The most frustrating thing about this plot is the total lack of the presence of the creator of this mysterious snow globe and any reasonable explanation why it has appeared who its creator is and why all of these disasters are happening to this tiny town of Normal Alaska. It left me pulling out my hair in frustration.
The viewer is clearly in danger of losing whatever intelligence they may have by watch this movie so run, don't walk away from it! Mysterious cracks show up all around the town with fire and yet there is no offer of how or why. Mysteriously trees pop out of the ground in random places that skewer folks and cars.
The most frustrating thing about this plot is the total lack of the presence of the creator of this mysterious snow globe and any reasonable explanation why it has appeared who its creator is and why all of these disasters are happening to this tiny town of Normal Alaska. It left me pulling out my hair in frustration.
As I have said many times already I have made no secret of disliking a lot of SyFy's films, but I do keep watching to see if they do come up with something that is watchable at least. They have done a few movies that are surprisingly tolerable though even they are far from perfect, but most are bad but you are amused by the awfulness or are like witnessing a train-wreck.
I was very mixed on Snowmageddon actually, of the above categories it sits between the tolerable and so bad it's good ones. I do give it plaudits for the better than average acting, granted it is not brilliant but it is award-worthy compared to the likes of Quantum Apocalypse and Titanic II, decent photography and a storyline that is mostly interesting and original in concept.
That is not to say that the story is perfect though. It is interesting and generally well paced, but it does take a while to get going and the ending is abrupt. There are also scenes and ideas that suspend disbelief and don't make much sense, but for the first time in a while I actually got some novelty value out of them. These are including the ideas that electricity is still flowing in a town that is cut off from the rest of the world, flying even with ice bombs are going off and nobody in the town carrying a knife.
Snowmageddon also has some amateurish effects-though I've seen worse-, cheesy dialogue and characters that aren't developed enough to make us care for them. I loved the title, but it didn't fit with the concept and story, it was like there had been a last minute title change or that they had thought of a new idea and forgot to think of a title that fitted.
Overall, not as bad as other SyFy efforts, but there is nothing really that stood out to make it memorable or good. 4/10 Bethany Cox
I was very mixed on Snowmageddon actually, of the above categories it sits between the tolerable and so bad it's good ones. I do give it plaudits for the better than average acting, granted it is not brilliant but it is award-worthy compared to the likes of Quantum Apocalypse and Titanic II, decent photography and a storyline that is mostly interesting and original in concept.
That is not to say that the story is perfect though. It is interesting and generally well paced, but it does take a while to get going and the ending is abrupt. There are also scenes and ideas that suspend disbelief and don't make much sense, but for the first time in a while I actually got some novelty value out of them. These are including the ideas that electricity is still flowing in a town that is cut off from the rest of the world, flying even with ice bombs are going off and nobody in the town carrying a knife.
Snowmageddon also has some amateurish effects-though I've seen worse-, cheesy dialogue and characters that aren't developed enough to make us care for them. I loved the title, but it didn't fit with the concept and story, it was like there had been a last minute title change or that they had thought of a new idea and forgot to think of a title that fitted.
Overall, not as bad as other SyFy efforts, but there is nothing really that stood out to make it memorable or good. 4/10 Bethany Cox
There have a been a few SyFy Channel movies lately that I have really enjoyed. Snowmageddon had a very original story line which on a large scale budget could have been even better. I won't go into details of the plot since it can be read on the main page and in other reviews, but it really reminded me of something Stephen King would write, mixed with a little Lord Of The Rings for good measure.
I generally like most SyFy productions but some are better than others and Snowmageddon ranks up there with some of the best for me. I was definitely entertained for an hour and a half and have no regrets in watching this time waster.
I give it a solid B+
I generally like most SyFy productions but some are better than others and Snowmageddon ranks up there with some of the best for me. I was definitely entertained for an hour and a half and have no regrets in watching this time waster.
I give it a solid B+
Did you know
- TriviaAlso played on Showcase Dec 22 2016 under the title 'Snowglobe Christmas'.
- Goofs(at around 19 mins) The (broken) clock tower shows 10:05. John asks Fred if he had repaired it. A few seconds later, the clock shows now 10:10.
- ConnectionsReferenced in End of the World (2013)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Infierno en la nieve
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 29 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content