The Boy Who Was a King

The Boy Who Was a King presents an immensely interesting subject: a 7-year old Bulgarian Prince who becomes King following the sudden death of his father. The family is exiled during WWII and, 50 years later, the boy king returns to Bulgaria to become Prime Minister in a landslide election.

Sadly, this film doesn't teach the audience much beyond that.

Among its primary flaws, the film has no narrator. King Simeon himself, BBC interviewers, and various other eclectic Bulgarians each tell pieces of a tale that together do little to create a cohesive story.

Paounov certainly has a gift for finding unique and interesting characters who, throughout the film, give their opinions on the king and what he means to them (and what he doesn't). These vignettes on their own would have made for fascinating documentary, as some of these characters are worthy of having their own stories told. However, these tales do nothing to elucidate the film's subject, leaving the viewer confused and frustrated as to their purpose. Most are unnecessarily long and in a few cases, the payoff isn't worth the wait.

In all, we learn nothing of the context in which the king returns to his country, his rise to political power, or his time in office. Wikipedia filled in the many interesting blanks and political and economic context that should have been the foundation for this film.

There are hints of strength - an interesting premise and spectacular archival footage of the boy as prince, king, and in exile. But without a voice, a cohesive story and extraneous material, this documentary fails to deliver on its fundamental mission.

It's a shame to know there is something very special in the story that's not been told.

Cool documentary! Unique & funny. It's like a historic doc. gone wild. I don't think I ever seen anything quite like it. It's a must for all film buffs and fans of smart and odd films. Beware: will leave lasting mind boggling impressions. The ex-king's story is in his words a simply "circumstantial" series of unexpected events in the fairytale of life. From king to exile and back to failed prime minister of Bulgaria -this picture is such a royal trip, a unique story told in ingenious way with all kinds of fun narrative moves. People are cheering during some episodes- seriously! Very nice work guys, hope you have a nice run with this flick.

The Boy Who Was a King tells the fascinating story of Bulgaria's former monarch, who was exiled by the communists when he was a child, only to make a triumphant return to the country as its prime-minister in the post-communist years. Simeon Saxe-Cobourg-Gotta 's story is truly remarkable and Paunov's film captures its essence, delivering a cinematic tour -de -force that forces us to rethink the limits of the documentary genre.

The Boy Who Was a King has all the ingredients of powerful filmmaking: great characters, captivating storytelling, notable cinematography and outstanding original score. Paunov, however, takes it a step further. By telling the story of Saxe-Cobourg-Gotta, this director also successfully tells the story of the great European transformations that shook the 20th century: the end of the monarchy, the communist takeover, and the painful transition to democracy. Paunov lends a voice to all the other participants in these great experiments. We see Simeon's fans and haters: Japanese settlers in Bulgaria who sing an ode to the king- turned - minister, an unforgettable and touching scene with a woman who made him a suit with 77 pockets to the hilarious but all-so-real meeting of present-day communist party members. The film is masterfully inter-cut with stunning archival footage which takes us from Bulgaria to Egypt, through ancient European castles and dreamy resorts, to the interview chair of Charlie Rose and back on the streets of Bulgaria's capital, where journalists are shouting at Simeon. Through it all, with subtlety and intellectual finesse, Paunov weaves the compelling words of Cobourg-Gotta himself.

The Boy Who Was a King is one of these extraordinary films that leave you pondering a long time after you saw them and what is a true gift is that this director allows the viewers to think for themselves. This, I sincerely appreciate.