IMDb RATING
7.5/10
1.9K
YOUR RATING
Follows the life and career of actor Steve Martin.Follows the life and career of actor Steve Martin.Follows the life and career of actor Steve Martin.
- Nominated for 5 Primetime Emmys
- 9 nominations total
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaIn a 2024 interview with Variety, Morgan Neville spoke about why the film did not discuss Steve Martin's famous "King Tut" song and performance: "To bring it up, then you have to have this modern discussion of what was Steve trying to say with it? That would be narrative quicksand. The reason Steve wrote that song and the context around it, which was totally lost, was that he was actually making fun of the consumerization and fetishization of ancient cultures in the West and all that. So that's another documentary. But again I was concerned with his standup story and where he was at that time. As opposed to what's our 2023 reading of something at that time? So honestly, 'King Tut' wasn't at the top of my list of things to put in the film. It was never a scene in the film even before the internet (controversy)."
- ConnectionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 937: Road House (2024)
Featured review
Steve, We Hardly Knew Ye
I get it, most people who will watch this "documentary" are/were fans of Martin. And you know, during a time when the country desperately needed a laugh, he swooped in with his bizarre take on comedy, and made a lot of people laugh. So, good on him for being that guy. Pun intended.
The good? Rarely seen photos and footage of Martin's early days provide a glimpse into the modest beginnings of a well known performer. The bald and pained ("please turn it off, it's so bad I can't bear it") assessment by Martin of some of his early gags. The insight into what was clearly an abusive relationship with his father also lends depth to what drove him.
The less than good? That's a slippery slope. As a documentary, having a bunch of celebrity buddies offer their thoughts is questionable. It's all so gushingly positive that it quickly becomes boring. Even when he was at his zeitgeist peak, I never found the walk-like-an-Egyptian or I'm-a-wild-and-crazy-guy shtick all that funny. It made me laugh when my friends tried to do it, but genius comedy? No.
The documentary tries very hard to paint him as an iconic master of comedy. The fact that his routines haven't aged well puts the lie to that theory.
Can he act? Yes. There are three films in his catalogue that I think are great: one comedy and two serious roles. Does he resonate as an image of the late seventies and early eighties? Yes. Like other offbeat performers he developed his bits and found a niche and cashed in.
There were five moments that I thought were worth the watch: when he himself couldn't bear to watch his early frenetic stuff; when he and Martin Short were trying to write a set and were failing miserably; even on The Tonight Show Sammie Davis Jr stood up to give him a hug when he finished his set and he didn't know how to respond because "my family weren't huggers"; when his father (a class A1 jerk if ever there was one) offered the critique "well he's no Charlie Chaplin" on his movie The Jerk; and when an early girlfriend reminisced that when she broke up with him she couldn't handle his strange comedic ramblings even though she knew he wouldn't stop pursuing fame, and believed he would eventually make it happen.
The good? Rarely seen photos and footage of Martin's early days provide a glimpse into the modest beginnings of a well known performer. The bald and pained ("please turn it off, it's so bad I can't bear it") assessment by Martin of some of his early gags. The insight into what was clearly an abusive relationship with his father also lends depth to what drove him.
The less than good? That's a slippery slope. As a documentary, having a bunch of celebrity buddies offer their thoughts is questionable. It's all so gushingly positive that it quickly becomes boring. Even when he was at his zeitgeist peak, I never found the walk-like-an-Egyptian or I'm-a-wild-and-crazy-guy shtick all that funny. It made me laugh when my friends tried to do it, but genius comedy? No.
The documentary tries very hard to paint him as an iconic master of comedy. The fact that his routines haven't aged well puts the lie to that theory.
Can he act? Yes. There are three films in his catalogue that I think are great: one comedy and two serious roles. Does he resonate as an image of the late seventies and early eighties? Yes. Like other offbeat performers he developed his bits and found a niche and cashed in.
There were five moments that I thought were worth the watch: when he himself couldn't bear to watch his early frenetic stuff; when he and Martin Short were trying to write a set and were failing miserably; even on The Tonight Show Sammie Davis Jr stood up to give him a hug when he finished his set and he didn't know how to respond because "my family weren't huggers"; when his father (a class A1 jerk if ever there was one) offered the critique "well he's no Charlie Chaplin" on his movie The Jerk; and when an early girlfriend reminisced that when she broke up with him she couldn't handle his strange comedic ramblings even though she knew he wouldn't stop pursuing fame, and believed he would eventually make it happen.
- TMAuthor23
- Apr 3, 2024
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime3 hours 11 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Steve! (Martin): A Documentary in 2 Pieces (2024)?
Answer