A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Antonina Berezka
- Molniya
- (voice)
Jeff Berg
- Blue Baron
- (voice)
Gregg Berger
- Announcer Andy
- (voice)
- …
David Boat
- Davidson
- (voice)
Ben Diskin
- Patrick
- (voice)
- …
Hilary Duff
- Windy
- (English version)
- (voice)
Josh Duhamel
- Ace
- (English version)
- (voice)
Ron Fleishman
- Yellow Tractor
- (voice)
Aleksey Frandetti
- Vityas
- (voice)
Valentin Gaft
- Byvaly
- (voice)
Aleksandr Golovin
- Baloban
- (voice)
Wes Hubbard
- Hawk
- (voice)
Aleksandr Lenkov
- Mikhalych
- (voice)
Jesse McCartney
- Cyclone
- (English version)
- (voice)
Andrey Merzlikin
- Grom
- (voice)
Featured reviews
This is the only mockbuster I can call my favorite. Cute animation, and famous actors. Not to mention the theme song.
I cannot believe this is the worst animated mockbusters of the 2010s that i've ever seen along with Tangled Up, Kiara the Brave, Tappy Toes, Chop Kick Panda, Puss In Boots: A Furry Tail, The Legend of a Panda Warrior, Delhi Safari, Life's a Jungle, Fanatstic 4orce, Frozen Land, Birds of Paradise, Izzie's Way Home, Trolland, The Adventures of Petey and Friends, CarGo and Wheely, this movie is also a gigantic knock-off to Disney's Planes, which was kickasss, the main character Ace is so unlikeable, and his friend Dodo is so annoying.
I knew this movie was going to be somewhat "b-grade" and riding on the coat tails of Disney's Planes... but I wasn't expecting such an overall bad movie. It was seriously terrible. TERRIBLE. I wonder if the better known actors that appeared in the movie knew what the producers were planning to release. The dialog didn't even flow. It was a very basic and done-before plot and they couldn't even make it hold my kids attention. They love movie night. But this just had them bored, they got up and found their toys and played in front of the TV, not even looking up. Like they knew it wasn't a real movie. No character depth (at all). Bad animation that was just clearly trying to copy a "style" of Pixar - but didn't cut it in any way. This was a waste of my money and my kids time. I was bitterly disappointed and am somewhat angry (partly at my self for not looking at reviews first) that I ever got this movie for them. Don't see this movie, it doesn't deserve any attention. It's shameful.
I wanted to watch this movie because I thought that this would be a good and intelligent knock off of Planes. When I watched the movie, it just didn't sync up with the trailer, and instead had little to no music. The movie had boring dialogue that you would expect from any other knock off movie. The 2D graphics were cool, but the 3d graphics were mediocre. The only thing that I remembered from this movie was the metal clanking when the dumb APC "blinks" his eyes. The "blinking" gets annoying and ends up to be the only thing you would anticipate in this movie. At least this movie wasn't just a goof up like "A car's life" or "Tiny Robots". Mediocre film.
While Disney's Planes from personal opinion wasn't particularly good, not a plane wreck but disappointingly lazy, it is much better than this. The two are being compared due to Wings being advertised in a way that viewers immediately think that 'this is a rip-off of Planes.'
The good news is that Wings is certainly not as blatant or as insulting as most animated mock busters are, it's derivative of Cars (like Planes was) but seeing as Wings' release dates predate those for Planes I am not going to be so hasty to call it a rip-off regardless of the advertising. What stops Wings from being rated any less is a few solid character designs, not as creepy or as robotic as feared. Other than that Wings never does take off, and crashes and burns when at its worst.
Most of the animation is not very good. There's worse computer animation out there (even the worst of it is nowhere near Video Brinquedo or Spark Plug Entertainment bad), but apart from the character designs the lack of budget and polish shows in the flat colours, some very stiff movement and framing and less than handsome and polished backgrounds, some of it looking out of sync too and the flying sequences lack energy and are choppily edited. The soundtrack is reasonably pleasant and rousing on its own but doesn't quite work within the film; there are numerous moments in Wings where the music just doesn't fit with the action. Apparently it was different in the original Russian version, and there are times where you can tell that there were changes, especially in the soundtrack, the dialogue and some of the animation, and the original version probably would have fitted better.
In terms of writing Wings fares very poorly. The dialogue plays it far too safe, and lacks any spark, instead being very flat and shallow throughout. It's not insultingly juvenile or over-complicated, it just feels bland, with some of it feeling rambling or not particularly relevant. The story fails to maintain momentum, with its 88 minute running time starting to feel too long even as much as halfway through (Planes' story was very lazy and it was not one of the stronger assets of Cars either, except nowhere near as bad, but the storytelling in Wings is even lazier). Like the dialogue, some parts are played too safe with the flying lacking energy, invention or danger, action is very sedate in the early parts, while the latter half becomes muddled and some of the story felt jumpy and incomplete.
The characters while decently designed are rather cookie-cutter and have little personality or personality to hold one's attention. Dodo comes over as obnoxious, Cyclone is a dull villain who is more of a rival bully sort of character (which doesn't come over convincingly due to the lack of tension between the characters) whose comeuppance is incredibly rushed and the leads are inoffensive but with little to make them stand out. The voice acting is competent (although Rob Schneider really gets on the nerves), but fits in the category of just about getting the job done but with not much to distinguish themselves.
All in all, there's worse to be had, to be sure, than Wings, but it never does take off, feeling too bland, too safe, sometimes muddled and forgettable. 2/10 Bethany Cox
The good news is that Wings is certainly not as blatant or as insulting as most animated mock busters are, it's derivative of Cars (like Planes was) but seeing as Wings' release dates predate those for Planes I am not going to be so hasty to call it a rip-off regardless of the advertising. What stops Wings from being rated any less is a few solid character designs, not as creepy or as robotic as feared. Other than that Wings never does take off, and crashes and burns when at its worst.
Most of the animation is not very good. There's worse computer animation out there (even the worst of it is nowhere near Video Brinquedo or Spark Plug Entertainment bad), but apart from the character designs the lack of budget and polish shows in the flat colours, some very stiff movement and framing and less than handsome and polished backgrounds, some of it looking out of sync too and the flying sequences lack energy and are choppily edited. The soundtrack is reasonably pleasant and rousing on its own but doesn't quite work within the film; there are numerous moments in Wings where the music just doesn't fit with the action. Apparently it was different in the original Russian version, and there are times where you can tell that there were changes, especially in the soundtrack, the dialogue and some of the animation, and the original version probably would have fitted better.
In terms of writing Wings fares very poorly. The dialogue plays it far too safe, and lacks any spark, instead being very flat and shallow throughout. It's not insultingly juvenile or over-complicated, it just feels bland, with some of it feeling rambling or not particularly relevant. The story fails to maintain momentum, with its 88 minute running time starting to feel too long even as much as halfway through (Planes' story was very lazy and it was not one of the stronger assets of Cars either, except nowhere near as bad, but the storytelling in Wings is even lazier). Like the dialogue, some parts are played too safe with the flying lacking energy, invention or danger, action is very sedate in the early parts, while the latter half becomes muddled and some of the story felt jumpy and incomplete.
The characters while decently designed are rather cookie-cutter and have little personality or personality to hold one's attention. Dodo comes over as obnoxious, Cyclone is a dull villain who is more of a rival bully sort of character (which doesn't come over convincingly due to the lack of tension between the characters) whose comeuppance is incredibly rushed and the leads are inoffensive but with little to make them stand out. The voice acting is competent (although Rob Schneider really gets on the nerves), but fits in the category of just about getting the job done but with not much to distinguish themselves.
All in all, there's worse to be had, to be sure, than Wings, but it never does take off, feeling too bland, too safe, sometimes muddled and forgettable. 2/10 Bethany Cox
Did you know
- TriviaDespite popular belief, the cartoon is not a copy of "Planes", as it was released a year earlier. At the time of release, the style of the cartoon was presented as "Cars", only with planes.
- Alternate versionsThe score for the English-language version was composed by Ramón Balcázar
- ConnectionsFollowed by Wings: Sky Force Heroes (2014)
- How long is Wings?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $2,250,147
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content