30 reviews
- sven-49-694776
- Sep 27, 2013
- Permalink
I agree with the other comment on the stupidity of the Orcs and that the heroes of the film never missing a shot and about the dead disappearing. However I was still entertained by the movie up until I watched a dead Orc being rolled off the front porch. The Orcs were said to be from a dimension that did not have or understand technology or modern weapons and yet the one rolled off the porch had on a pair of modern boots with dimpled molded soles. You would expect anyone going over the film for continuity or accuracy would have noticed that small point.
I was entertained, there was nothing on the TV and I was bored, so it served it's purpose, but it is never going to win them any awards, nor make them their fortunes.
I see I had to remove the u from between the o and l in the word molded as I could not post unless I corrected it to a US dictionary spelling. Never mind the fact that the soles of the boots were made in a M O U L D.
I was entertained, there was nothing on the TV and I was bored, so it served it's purpose, but it is never going to win them any awards, nor make them their fortunes.
I see I had to remove the u from between the o and l in the word molded as I could not post unless I corrected it to a US dictionary spelling. Never mind the fact that the soles of the boots were made in a M O U L D.
- systemic-aps
- Oct 4, 2013
- Permalink
Yeah, ORC WARS isn't too bad for what it is: a really cheesy and unbelievable action-packed B-movie that happily rips off the look of the orcs from THE LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy. I mean, the orcs in this film are EXACTLY the same as in those Peter Jackson movies: so much so that if I worked for Weta Workshop I'd be tempted to sue. The orcs are the most entertaining part of this movie, but I'm not too sure about their presence in the real, contemporary world.
I mean, seeing orcs interacting with modern-day human characters, farmhouses, and vehicles is just plain odd and realism is never going to be a priority in that situation. Still, given that this is a B-movie with the usual problems (absolutely fake looking CGI fire, fake looking black blood clouds for the orcs, rubbish acting and a non-existent script) it's actually quite entertaining by the standards of the sub-genre.
ORC WARS incorporates an absolute ton of action into its running time, particularly in the second half which involves a running battle between humans and orcs. Sure, a lot of it is repetitive, but they even manage a dragon in the budget, which is quite impressive. By the standards of normal film this is a complete waste of time, but as a B-movie you can do much, much worse.
I mean, seeing orcs interacting with modern-day human characters, farmhouses, and vehicles is just plain odd and realism is never going to be a priority in that situation. Still, given that this is a B-movie with the usual problems (absolutely fake looking CGI fire, fake looking black blood clouds for the orcs, rubbish acting and a non-existent script) it's actually quite entertaining by the standards of the sub-genre.
ORC WARS incorporates an absolute ton of action into its running time, particularly in the second half which involves a running battle between humans and orcs. Sure, a lot of it is repetitive, but they even manage a dragon in the budget, which is quite impressive. By the standards of normal film this is a complete waste of time, but as a B-movie you can do much, much worse.
- Leofwine_draca
- May 18, 2015
- Permalink
I watched this movie only because I wanted to see just how bad it actually was. Talk about a horrible plot. This movie is soo low budget, the heroine is actually using a Lord of the Rings replica of 'Sting'. I have never before seen a movie rip off such a known piece and try to pass it off as original. Of course, after seeing that, I have to wonder - are all of those orcs wearing Extra's costumes from the Lord of the Rings films? With the number of folks hired to participate in those films, they'd be easy to find and hire in.
The only reason I didn't give this movie a '1', is that I enjoyed the cheesy Eastwood impression that the first Sentinel was passing off.
The only reason I didn't give this movie a '1', is that I enjoyed the cheesy Eastwood impression that the first Sentinel was passing off.
- the-aemish
- Sep 29, 2013
- Permalink
I created an account just for this movie. I had very low expectations as with most lesser known movies these days and this one slid under the bar (world record in the limbo dancing world)! Story bad, acting okay, costumes well done, directing sufficient, wardrobe good, filming not bad......and you'd think okay - we're onto something.....WRONG! I love low budget movies, but this one left me asking why I attempted to make it through the whole movie (and I did, as punishment for even trying)....save your precious time on the planet people and watch something like paint drying. (or an idiom pondering?) All in all - entertaining for some, disturbing for most and laughable to the masses!
- kellycomar
- Oct 20, 2013
- Permalink
- nogodnomasters
- Feb 9, 2018
- Permalink
I moderate a bad movie screening series that's described as "A celebration of awful movies through semi-regular Monday night screenings by rotating hosts. From the polluted minds behind Good Things About Bad Movies and Halloween Horror Picks."
Dragonfyre was the ninth bad movie we watched, and most of us thought it was actually rather decent. What follows is the mini review I shared with the group shortly after first watching the movie.
Tonight's Bad Movie was pretty watchable, at least compared to the no budget SOV garbage we usually watch. That's not to say that Dragonfyre was good, exactly, but we all agreed that it has been undeservedly kicked in the shins on IMDb... 3.4 is definitely lower than our estimations.
Still, at its core, this is a movie about a retired soldier (played by an underwear model) who finds himself the guardian of a dimensional portal that allows LARPers in Lord of the Rings costumes to hassle rednecks. There's something in there about an elf princess and a Native American stereotype too, not to mention a witch and a "fyre" breathing CGI dragon. Truthfully, the obnoxious spelling in the title might be the worst thing about this movie as I otherwise kinda enjoyed watching a redneck kill orcs with a shotgun for 90 minutes.
Dragonfyre was the ninth bad movie we watched, and most of us thought it was actually rather decent. What follows is the mini review I shared with the group shortly after first watching the movie.
- - - - -
Tonight's Bad Movie was pretty watchable, at least compared to the no budget SOV garbage we usually watch. That's not to say that Dragonfyre was good, exactly, but we all agreed that it has been undeservedly kicked in the shins on IMDb... 3.4 is definitely lower than our estimations.
Still, at its core, this is a movie about a retired soldier (played by an underwear model) who finds himself the guardian of a dimensional portal that allows LARPers in Lord of the Rings costumes to hassle rednecks. There's something in there about an elf princess and a Native American stereotype too, not to mention a witch and a "fyre" breathing CGI dragon. Truthfully, the obnoxious spelling in the title might be the worst thing about this movie as I otherwise kinda enjoyed watching a redneck kill orcs with a shotgun for 90 minutes.
- hollywoodpsychic
- Apr 16, 2018
- Permalink
This movie is perfect for comedy purpose and to entertain the kids but not the movie even to pass the time....seriously are u kidding me...swords vs guns...is this a match? it looked funny to me...what kinda arc were they? speaking so good English playing role of ancient...look like monsters and powerful but stupid....only the princess i like...Ale ya...the princess is so sexy...the movie i just watched her because there was nothing in movie to put my interest in. she is the lucky one to get my interest..her makeup was fine...outfit was perfect...there should be at least one romantic scene when the princess is so hot...the ex-force mercenary should had that chance even in the end like they have peaceful life after war...
"Orc Wars" (aka "Dragonfyre") was like watching a recording of a LARP event. And personally I am not one to enjoy the whole LARP scene, and I surely wasn't impressed by this movie.
The orcs, well they looked like something that was copied and pasted right out of something from the Tolkien universe. So whether or not that was good, well that is debatable. Sure, the costumes and armors were great, but it was just lacking originality, because it had all been seen in the "Lord of the Rings" movies. But they get an effort for trying and for putting this much effort into the costumes.
For the story, well just don't get your hopes up here, because the storyline was just downright embarrassing to witness. It was as stupid as it was uninspiring.
The acting was fair enough, just don't expect anything groundbreaking or overly innovative here.
As much as I enjoy sword and sorcery fantasy, then "Orc Wars" was just bad entertaining and a waste of time. And truth be told, then I actually fell asleep during this and had to get up and turn it off to find something else to catch my interest and attention. I got no idea how it ended, because I gave up about half way into the movie or so, and even there having missed out on a lot of it from falling asleep...
The orcs, well they looked like something that was copied and pasted right out of something from the Tolkien universe. So whether or not that was good, well that is debatable. Sure, the costumes and armors were great, but it was just lacking originality, because it had all been seen in the "Lord of the Rings" movies. But they get an effort for trying and for putting this much effort into the costumes.
For the story, well just don't get your hopes up here, because the storyline was just downright embarrassing to witness. It was as stupid as it was uninspiring.
The acting was fair enough, just don't expect anything groundbreaking or overly innovative here.
As much as I enjoy sword and sorcery fantasy, then "Orc Wars" was just bad entertaining and a waste of time. And truth be told, then I actually fell asleep during this and had to get up and turn it off to find something else to catch my interest and attention. I got no idea how it ended, because I gave up about half way into the movie or so, and even there having missed out on a lot of it from falling asleep...
- paul_haakonsen
- Feb 24, 2014
- Permalink
I watched it expecting something really crappy. And the effects weren't the best obviously. The orcs weren't the best looking but they weren't the worst... So when it started out this was all I saw, and I thought I probably wouldn't finish watching. But once the story got moving I found the acting & dialogue to be surprisingly good. The camera work was good too.
I was just REALLY surprised that such a cheesy premise & low budget film could be so entertaining. If you ONLY want to see perfect effects & action sequences, then you'll be disappointed, but I thought they were good enough to tell the story without being so jarringly terrible that it breaks the 4th wall.
I give it a 9 for taking a really odd story and making it fun without a massive budget to fall back on.
I was just REALLY surprised that such a cheesy premise & low budget film could be so entertaining. If you ONLY want to see perfect effects & action sequences, then you'll be disappointed, but I thought they were good enough to tell the story without being so jarringly terrible that it breaks the 4th wall.
I give it a 9 for taking a really odd story and making it fun without a massive budget to fall back on.
- mishypiranha
- Oct 15, 2013
- Permalink
Former soldier John Norton buys a ranch in the middle of nowhere (shot in Utah) and is surprised to find that his new neighbors are an elf princess and an army of Orcs chasing her. He happens to live next to a gate to another world and is destined to become guardian of the gate. Not an easy task, as evil creatures are coming through every day. Since the Orcs do not know guns, though, they think Norton is a sorcerer with magic weapons, but when he defends the princess, the Orcs summon a powerful ally to strike back: a fire-breathing dragon...
Despite the low budget, simple countryside setting and unknown actors, this was surprisingly good fun. The script has a great sense of humor (for example when Katie gets a gun to fight the Orcs because they wrecked her car), nobody takes it too seriously, and the overall feeling is like watching an 1980s trash classic rather than a new digital production. Nothing wrong with that!
Despite the low budget, simple countryside setting and unknown actors, this was surprisingly good fun. The script has a great sense of humor (for example when Katie gets a gun to fight the Orcs because they wrecked her car), nobody takes it too seriously, and the overall feeling is like watching an 1980s trash classic rather than a new digital production. Nothing wrong with that!
- unbrokenmetal
- Oct 5, 2014
- Permalink
Sort of wondering about the legal implications of using what is clearly a slightly altered (in the hilt) or knock-off version of the LOTR licensed Sting sword. Clearly there's some fandom going on, including dialogue references to LOTR, so maybe it's all in good fun, but they even showed the sword in the end credits, with clearly visible Elvish script and all.
However, have to give props; the practical make-up was pretty darn good, almost as good as the digital fill-ins were bad, and the voice acting at least was on the verge of stirring at times. Given the budget, good effort.
However, have to give props; the practical make-up was pretty darn good, almost as good as the digital fill-ins were bad, and the voice acting at least was on the verge of stirring at times. Given the budget, good effort.
- douglaswhidden
- Apr 10, 2016
- Permalink
This movie is a deep and moving tale about a us veteran fighting orcs that represent his demons you have to be really intelligent to understand this Masterpiece!!!
I used to write reviews as any other person does..speaking from own viewpoint and found myself forced to give it a value. I actually did not like this idea because you can look at a movie in many ways and how does a movie from one genre compare to another? A movie can be a piece of art, yet be very boring. Or well made, but very gruesome.(I read Saw falls in that category, but I do not like those kind of movies, so I did not see Saw and thus I can not tell much about it.).
I therefore use Henry and Kristl to create a kind of dialog in which two persons watch the same movie, but experience it in a different way. But there are limits to this idea and one limit is a movie that is so utterly appalling that it is a true waste of time. Orc Wars is such a movie.
Now normally I would not even write a review for a movie like Orc Wars, but it amazes me when people give such a bad movie points for odd reasons. For one.. the fact that a movie is made with a low budget is not an reason to give it more points. A movie is bad because it is badly written, badly acted, badly shot and badly cut. It is bad because each and every step in the making of the movie has been done in bad and sloppy way. And to underscore ad nauseum: Orc Wars is such a movie.
There are fan movies on you tube which are more watchable than Orc Wars. And made by people with no budget at all and only a handy cam. Orc Wars has at least a production team of sorts and look how it turns out.
Now I could try and hammer down on the badly made stuff, but let me direct myself to the people who made this movie happen. And I do not mean the actors, but the director, director of photography, the producer. The people who took the decisions.
Rule 1: Be original. Stop trying to making another Lord of the Rings! You do not have the money, the talent, the actors and all the other stuff that is needed. And any cheap rip-off will just look like what it is: a cheap rip-off. And no, your movie will not become a cult classic, for you need a good script and good dialogue.
Rule 2: Do not be cheap. When you do not have the money for it then do not substitute with a cheap version. Why have a dragon in a movie, when you haven't got the money to make it look awesome?
Rule 3: Visual style. Stop using drab colors because others use it or you need to hide your bad costumes. Stop using those mediocre shots and angles. Do not show something that looks bad. Just do not have it in the movie at all. Here is where you can make a difference without having to spend a lot. Use fitting colors and a good shooting plan. It makes your movie so much better.
Rule 4: Invest in your actors. Most actors who have finished successfully an acting study will be decent enough to do the job. In a fantasy you can actually get away with using starting actors as adventures so there is a lot of possibilities. Bad acting is usually caused by the lack of good dialog and script. It is here were you lot should provided your actors with the proper equipment. In my country they got something that is called back to the stage.. in which actors are put on the stage without any script. Without a script most of the time the actors will start joking. Very few actors can create a good serious dialog and act it out at the same time.
Now let's give an example from the opera. What you basically are doing is pushing aside Mozart or Verdi or Wagner. Put a bunch of singers and actors on a stage, throw in some scenery and voila, you think that a new opera has been created. It has.. but it will be an utter mess.. Like this movie.
Rule 5: For godsake..invest in a script. A script is the framework that keeps the whole thing together. Orc Wars has no script..it has just one single idea: Orcs invade our world and a lonely hero fights them using modern weaponry. Nothing else is going on. No character development. No drama. No twists. No deeper insights. It is an idea that has fifteen minutes of running time at the most. You need to have more.
Rule 6: Use good fitting music and sounds! Being cheap with the sound and music is just bad. There are many starting artists that would love to make a good soundtrack. And some are talented.
This movie is a classic example of a movie that should not have been made. I read it was a sort of sequel to Orcs (whatever). It would not be surprising that there will be a third. The infamous orcs-trilogy. Where the heck do these people get the money to finance it?
I therefore use Henry and Kristl to create a kind of dialog in which two persons watch the same movie, but experience it in a different way. But there are limits to this idea and one limit is a movie that is so utterly appalling that it is a true waste of time. Orc Wars is such a movie.
Now normally I would not even write a review for a movie like Orc Wars, but it amazes me when people give such a bad movie points for odd reasons. For one.. the fact that a movie is made with a low budget is not an reason to give it more points. A movie is bad because it is badly written, badly acted, badly shot and badly cut. It is bad because each and every step in the making of the movie has been done in bad and sloppy way. And to underscore ad nauseum: Orc Wars is such a movie.
There are fan movies on you tube which are more watchable than Orc Wars. And made by people with no budget at all and only a handy cam. Orc Wars has at least a production team of sorts and look how it turns out.
Now I could try and hammer down on the badly made stuff, but let me direct myself to the people who made this movie happen. And I do not mean the actors, but the director, director of photography, the producer. The people who took the decisions.
Rule 1: Be original. Stop trying to making another Lord of the Rings! You do not have the money, the talent, the actors and all the other stuff that is needed. And any cheap rip-off will just look like what it is: a cheap rip-off. And no, your movie will not become a cult classic, for you need a good script and good dialogue.
Rule 2: Do not be cheap. When you do not have the money for it then do not substitute with a cheap version. Why have a dragon in a movie, when you haven't got the money to make it look awesome?
Rule 3: Visual style. Stop using drab colors because others use it or you need to hide your bad costumes. Stop using those mediocre shots and angles. Do not show something that looks bad. Just do not have it in the movie at all. Here is where you can make a difference without having to spend a lot. Use fitting colors and a good shooting plan. It makes your movie so much better.
Rule 4: Invest in your actors. Most actors who have finished successfully an acting study will be decent enough to do the job. In a fantasy you can actually get away with using starting actors as adventures so there is a lot of possibilities. Bad acting is usually caused by the lack of good dialog and script. It is here were you lot should provided your actors with the proper equipment. In my country they got something that is called back to the stage.. in which actors are put on the stage without any script. Without a script most of the time the actors will start joking. Very few actors can create a good serious dialog and act it out at the same time.
Now let's give an example from the opera. What you basically are doing is pushing aside Mozart or Verdi or Wagner. Put a bunch of singers and actors on a stage, throw in some scenery and voila, you think that a new opera has been created. It has.. but it will be an utter mess.. Like this movie.
Rule 5: For godsake..invest in a script. A script is the framework that keeps the whole thing together. Orc Wars has no script..it has just one single idea: Orcs invade our world and a lonely hero fights them using modern weaponry. Nothing else is going on. No character development. No drama. No twists. No deeper insights. It is an idea that has fifteen minutes of running time at the most. You need to have more.
Rule 6: Use good fitting music and sounds! Being cheap with the sound and music is just bad. There are many starting artists that would love to make a good soundtrack. And some are talented.
This movie is a classic example of a movie that should not have been made. I read it was a sort of sequel to Orcs (whatever). It would not be surprising that there will be a third. The infamous orcs-trilogy. Where the heck do these people get the money to finance it?
Movies like this are never made to be blockbusters. Think Sharknado. Overall the acting isn't half bad, special effects could be made on a laptop. We watch these movies for pure entertainment and I feel this one delivers the perfect B rated look and feel I enjoy so much. The Orcs wearing work boots is just an added bonus. So sit back, relax and maybe do your taxes at the same time.
- kendallwehr
- Oct 28, 2018
- Permalink
Low budget but honestly not thay trash. Has some funny money and doesn't really frag on. The special effects are bad but orcs costumes are pretty good. This has got some good set pieces too. Overall maybe not worth a watch but not to bad.
- KoolCatReviews
- Apr 5, 2021
- Permalink
No one else on Earth noticed a second moon?
Do you flap your arms over your head like that when you run too?
Yes, by all means. Give the blind guy a gun.
Did anyone else notice the orcs run like old men with a bad knee?
At least the princess is really pretty. That's why I rated it 3 stars instead of 1.
Do you flap your arms over your head like that when you run too?
Yes, by all means. Give the blind guy a gun.
Did anyone else notice the orcs run like old men with a bad knee?
At least the princess is really pretty. That's why I rated it 3 stars instead of 1.
A wizard, nope not really! Other worlds? Maybe, but it all looks like Utah to me. The story is very flat and pretty straightforward. An ex-army guy buys an old farm with all the old secrets and takes over from a previous defender. Then you have a Princess to save.
After all the massive firepower in one arsenal vs an army of orcs, who keep raising from the dead, appearing in other places to die again against some shockingly poor visuals in another place.
I have to mention the makeup here as the orcs looks really good, whoever was behind that did a really good job and we must give the film credit here for that, as this was one of the few things that showed production value. The costume design was also fairly good.
The acting, so so. And there we go, not a bad watch, not a long film and I am sure a lot of people will be satisfied and enjoy the movie.
After all the massive firepower in one arsenal vs an army of orcs, who keep raising from the dead, appearing in other places to die again against some shockingly poor visuals in another place.
I have to mention the makeup here as the orcs looks really good, whoever was behind that did a really good job and we must give the film credit here for that, as this was one of the few things that showed production value. The costume design was also fairly good.
The acting, so so. And there we go, not a bad watch, not a long film and I am sure a lot of people will be satisfied and enjoy the movie.
This movie features a large body count. With all the mayhem it's easy to overlook characters that stayed engaging, some funny lines and the beautiful Texas scenery. This is an action movie and every human in the film is either an action hero or a horror victim. There are some satisfying plot culminations, and the action hero subverts a trope through a poker bluff, which takes some mindful writing. Each character who lasted more than a scene had development. Is this movie original? I've never seen a US Marine type guy fight off a horde of Orcs before, and the gun loving human side of me enjoyed the fantasy of a heroic battle an old D&D foe. The movies I'd compare it too have a tragic historical connotation of imperialism such as Zulu. There are too many movies with white protagonists slaughtering hordes of dark skinned people. As this takes place in Texas, it's impossible to separate borderland narratives in the real world from the story of this man protecting a boundary between worlds. This movie is not alone, LOTR sets the standard. This is my gripe with fantasy overall and is not specific to this movie. This movie is a mishmash of genres but is mostly a Western with Fantasy elements. It is very violent, around 1/4th as violent as Rambo 4. There is one scene that is like a tribute to Friday the 13th movies, but generally the violence is Action in nature and not Horror. There are two pulp scenes. There was no sexual violence.
As a lower level film maker myself I see many small issues that are distracting from an otherwise entertaining low budget movie. (the "after effects" gunshots/muzzle flashes/ejecting cartridges) coming from air soft style or resin prop guns. this can be distracting as its done way too much, and if they would have rented an armorer, a few real weapons and given more training to the actors on the use of them (for example you don't fire a barrett .50 from the hip while kneeling on a rooftop and actually expect to hit something) it would have helped keep the distractions down. and people watching the movie rather than questioning what they just saw.
the acting is not too...bad, a bit more emotion, a little less dumb-a$$/redneck stereo typing and some back-story would be helpful. the camera work is adequate but depending on the shooting conditions it seemed they the must have had a very limited amount of space to film the battle scenes in. with a little more thought and camera work i feel that the limited space used could be made to look like a lot more... it reminded me of shooting in someones backyard. one way or the other that's falls back on the producer for choosing the spot and the DP for not using what he had to its fullest.
as for the battle scenes, if the intent was to show overwhelming orc forces than they should have hired more extras, recycling eight people in rubber masks at a time throughout the movie just didn't work for me.
I am unsure what they spent the 1.5 mil on for the production, I have seen better production value for about a quarter mil. I could always nickel and dime it further but I really don't see a reason. Overall I liked what I saw and with so much poorly filmed/acted trash out there this was a nice change.
the acting is not too...bad, a bit more emotion, a little less dumb-a$$/redneck stereo typing and some back-story would be helpful. the camera work is adequate but depending on the shooting conditions it seemed they the must have had a very limited amount of space to film the battle scenes in. with a little more thought and camera work i feel that the limited space used could be made to look like a lot more... it reminded me of shooting in someones backyard. one way or the other that's falls back on the producer for choosing the spot and the DP for not using what he had to its fullest.
as for the battle scenes, if the intent was to show overwhelming orc forces than they should have hired more extras, recycling eight people in rubber masks at a time throughout the movie just didn't work for me.
I am unsure what they spent the 1.5 mil on for the production, I have seen better production value for about a quarter mil. I could always nickel and dime it further but I really don't see a reason. Overall I liked what I saw and with so much poorly filmed/acted trash out there this was a nice change.
- toddrobinson-350-467838
- Oct 1, 2013
- Permalink
Nit-picking small details is an easy way to write a review. "The special effects were poor, the acting was bad, the plot was stupid, blah blah blah." But every director knows that to make a good film you have to have a great many small and large details come together to do just one thing: entertain. Even several "bad" bits can be used effectively if the movie makers keep the goal in mind. The makers of this movie didn't let their little troubles get in the way, they just used what they had to good effect.
I personally feel that this film delivers in the entertainment category. I really had a good time watching it. While the usual fantasy film clichés abound, it manages to breathe new life into many of them by directly contrasting them to the real world reactions of normal earth folk. The idea is not necessarily original, but it always has potential.
The mix of modern weaponry against fantasy weaponry is really what this film is all about. Seriously now, who HASN'T watched "Lord of the Rings" and thought to themselves at one point or another, "Yeah... airstrike. That's what I'd do." Also, despite the drawbacks of poor animation and somewhat limited plot, the actors involved pull it off with enthusiasm, making themselves not just plausible, but even a little bit likable. The occasional witty comment was fitting, and the interplay between the orcs was reasonably fun to watch.
It exceeded my expectations and I had a good time watching it.
I personally feel that this film delivers in the entertainment category. I really had a good time watching it. While the usual fantasy film clichés abound, it manages to breathe new life into many of them by directly contrasting them to the real world reactions of normal earth folk. The idea is not necessarily original, but it always has potential.
The mix of modern weaponry against fantasy weaponry is really what this film is all about. Seriously now, who HASN'T watched "Lord of the Rings" and thought to themselves at one point or another, "Yeah... airstrike. That's what I'd do." Also, despite the drawbacks of poor animation and somewhat limited plot, the actors involved pull it off with enthusiasm, making themselves not just plausible, but even a little bit likable. The occasional witty comment was fitting, and the interplay between the orcs was reasonably fun to watch.
It exceeded my expectations and I had a good time watching it.
- rushknight
- Oct 15, 2013
- Permalink
Oh my, the hate against this film... yes, the low budget DID reuse props from other films (especially LotR) so does every film company, big or small. You'd be amazed just how many films and TV shows ended up using that "cheezey" armor from the first Starship Troopers. Granted, the heroine using a "sting" replica was a little too obvious, but ya use what ya can get.
As for the people complaining of "never missing", either they're blind, or we watched different movies. I was laughing my backside off at how much dirt was flying. Apparently "Special Forces" training has magically gotten a whole lot worse lately, as the guy could only land about 1 in 10, and Scooter couldn't figure out how to walk a machine gun into a target at all; something anyone who's played video games in the last 3 decades knows how to do.
The actual tactics were surprisingly accurate. Don't know if that was accidental or intentional, but the orcs used actual movements, tactics, and formations that were used historically when we had that equipment. The soldier used fairly realistic military strategy. The redneck acted like a redneck. I gave points for that, even though Im not sure it was deliberate. Its so incredibly rare to see people in films that have even the least clue of what they're supposed to be doing.
Overall, yes, it was low budget. Yes, the story was rather predictable. Guess what, that plot is rather standard fare for a good quarter of the fantasy/SF genre anyway. Your not gonna find a new angle after 7 decades of works. It burnt up a few hours, wasn't as bad as Sci-fi or BBC effects, wasn't as insultingly stupid as most USA and TBS TV movie plots, had a few cute faces, some chuckles, and one or two moments of decent bad-assery, if you actually knew what you were seeing.
I've seen a hella lot worse here with better ratings.
As for the people complaining of "never missing", either they're blind, or we watched different movies. I was laughing my backside off at how much dirt was flying. Apparently "Special Forces" training has magically gotten a whole lot worse lately, as the guy could only land about 1 in 10, and Scooter couldn't figure out how to walk a machine gun into a target at all; something anyone who's played video games in the last 3 decades knows how to do.
The actual tactics were surprisingly accurate. Don't know if that was accidental or intentional, but the orcs used actual movements, tactics, and formations that were used historically when we had that equipment. The soldier used fairly realistic military strategy. The redneck acted like a redneck. I gave points for that, even though Im not sure it was deliberate. Its so incredibly rare to see people in films that have even the least clue of what they're supposed to be doing.
Overall, yes, it was low budget. Yes, the story was rather predictable. Guess what, that plot is rather standard fare for a good quarter of the fantasy/SF genre anyway. Your not gonna find a new angle after 7 decades of works. It burnt up a few hours, wasn't as bad as Sci-fi or BBC effects, wasn't as insultingly stupid as most USA and TBS TV movie plots, had a few cute faces, some chuckles, and one or two moments of decent bad-assery, if you actually knew what you were seeing.
I've seen a hella lot worse here with better ratings.