Three interlocking love stories involving three couples in three cities: Rome, Paris, and New York.Three interlocking love stories involving three couples in three cities: Rome, Paris, and New York.Three interlocking love stories involving three couples in three cities: Rome, Paris, and New York.
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
6.330.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Well-intentioned but Forced
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS***
Paul Haggis has a heavy burden after winning Best Picture at the Oscars with "Crash," as high expectations have soon formulated any time he creates an interwoven story. Third Person, with its stellar cast and beautiful scenery, amplifies the hype, but unlike its predecessor, it doesn't deliver.
Third Person tells three love stories, featuring unrelatable caricatures. Liam Neeson is a Pulitzer-prize winner author, who smokes cigarettes in darkness and slams his Macbook when ideas don't seamlessly flow to him (people do that?). Olivia Wilde is a charming though emotionally-detached single-in-the-city gal. Adrian Brody is an American in Rome who detests the culture yet thrives in stealing. James Franco is artist-son of wealthy New Yorkers really? The characters often lack chemistry and their development often seems forced to fill the 'love du jour' trend of love-then-fighting-then love again. The performances are uninspiring, with the exception of Mila Kunis, who plays an ex-soap opera star and single mother trying to get her life back together.
Haggis spent many years crafting this film, but he had to verbally inform the audience of many of the interwoven intricacies. The film will appeal to the New York liberal intellectual crowd who thrive on 'complex' characters, but ultimately, this movie is all sizzle, no steak.
After the TIFF movie premiere, Haggis candidly stated that for the film he had difficulty attaining financing until the last minute. Perhaps this was an omen.
Paul Haggis has a heavy burden after winning Best Picture at the Oscars with "Crash," as high expectations have soon formulated any time he creates an interwoven story. Third Person, with its stellar cast and beautiful scenery, amplifies the hype, but unlike its predecessor, it doesn't deliver.
Third Person tells three love stories, featuring unrelatable caricatures. Liam Neeson is a Pulitzer-prize winner author, who smokes cigarettes in darkness and slams his Macbook when ideas don't seamlessly flow to him (people do that?). Olivia Wilde is a charming though emotionally-detached single-in-the-city gal. Adrian Brody is an American in Rome who detests the culture yet thrives in stealing. James Franco is artist-son of wealthy New Yorkers really? The characters often lack chemistry and their development often seems forced to fill the 'love du jour' trend of love-then-fighting-then love again. The performances are uninspiring, with the exception of Mila Kunis, who plays an ex-soap opera star and single mother trying to get her life back together.
Haggis spent many years crafting this film, but he had to verbally inform the audience of many of the interwoven intricacies. The film will appeal to the New York liberal intellectual crowd who thrive on 'complex' characters, but ultimately, this movie is all sizzle, no steak.
After the TIFF movie premiere, Haggis candidly stated that for the film he had difficulty attaining financing until the last minute. Perhaps this was an omen.
A Third Person Seemed To Be Too Much For This Tale To Handle
Third Person seeks to explore the betrayal of trust—the betrayal of fidelity and friendship. Paul Haggis, the director, has made a career out of making films that interweave numerous story lines. In this case, Liam Neeson, Olivia Wilde, Adrien Brody, Mila Kunis, and James Franco all comprise a wonderful ensemble that demands a range of powerful emotions to drive this story through its incessant melodrama (no negative connotation applied). The narrative here focuses on the romantic relationships and affairs that unfortunately still plague society and humanity's untamable nature. I'm sure we all know the implication of the film's title ("Third Person"), and with that, the drama goes on an almost two-and-a-half-hour drive through tense dialogue, flirtation, and sexy teases.
The movie teases and teases but never seems to reach the climax that its lengthy build-up continually suggests. Its first hour is fairly compelling in its set-up, deliberately introducing the audience to the exact predicament and its hapless participants. The plot over the rest of the film unravels quite cryptically, as well as in a manner that might appear heavily contrived to many viewers. There is a certain degree to which a suspension of belief should absolutely be mustered upon entering this picture. Aside from the contrivances, moments exist within that play to extreme dramatic effect but actually lead to a whole lot of nothing. After a great deal of meticulous development, a character screams and terrorizes a room out of realized anger as a tragic score plays to the segment's tune even though that scene essentially has no consequence in the sequences that follow (the character simply returns to a former state) as if the filmmaker was stylishly proceeding towards tragedy and quickly mopping up soon thereafter.
The actors themselves do a fantastic job and glue us to the screen albeit the script's occasional muddling of the conflict at hand. Adrien Brody, in my opinion, is the standout here, possessing a complex personality that battles between moral decisions and his wild desires. The writing in the first few scenes of his arc—we find him in a bar having a natural conversation with a mysterious woman (Moran Atias) as we immediately discern his dislike for foreign environments (particularly Italy) and his highly talkative, forceful nature. Olivia Wilde and Liam Neeson share the screen in probably the most compelling storyline where Neeson's strong infatuation for Wilde lends itself to perfidy and constant ridicule. Wilde's character plays a hard-to-get, but incredibly seductive, "sexpot" who tests Neeson's true loyalty to her while he starts to construct his next novel. Mila Kunis' part of the tale is definitely the least intriguing in its somewhat clichéd essence— she's bouncing from job to job, barely able to pay her monthly bills and struggling to reclaim her kid who was taken from her based on accusations of abuse.
Like I said, all of these individual threads in an interlocking story initially engross, but then, Third Person starts to drag on and on. It sits at a runtime of 2 hours and 17 minutes but honestly feels like it's reaching the 3-hour mark. The connection between these separate stories begins to materialize the further we advance into the plot while also shadowing it with plenty of confusion at the same time. The last scene is a head-scratcher in a bad way. You're scratching your head because that "da dumb" twist moment unintentionally goes over everyone's head and falls flat in its execution. So, wait: how are they exactly connected thematically and emotionally? All I witnessed was a multitude of contrivances that saw these characters crossing each other's paths for a few seconds. Of course, there's a reason to all this once the very end comes to fruition, but the point of the entire ordeal sorely misses its mark. There's too much going on with the quick cutting intensifying as we progress, and none of the arcs conclude satisfyingly.
With that being said, I still respect Haggis' ambition and his ventures into such heart-rending tales. Contrary to general reception, I genuinely enjoyed Crash, and now, I most likely find myself enjoying Third Person more than most as well. It's primarily absorbing throughout, just a tad bit too long and woolly.
The movie teases and teases but never seems to reach the climax that its lengthy build-up continually suggests. Its first hour is fairly compelling in its set-up, deliberately introducing the audience to the exact predicament and its hapless participants. The plot over the rest of the film unravels quite cryptically, as well as in a manner that might appear heavily contrived to many viewers. There is a certain degree to which a suspension of belief should absolutely be mustered upon entering this picture. Aside from the contrivances, moments exist within that play to extreme dramatic effect but actually lead to a whole lot of nothing. After a great deal of meticulous development, a character screams and terrorizes a room out of realized anger as a tragic score plays to the segment's tune even though that scene essentially has no consequence in the sequences that follow (the character simply returns to a former state) as if the filmmaker was stylishly proceeding towards tragedy and quickly mopping up soon thereafter.
The actors themselves do a fantastic job and glue us to the screen albeit the script's occasional muddling of the conflict at hand. Adrien Brody, in my opinion, is the standout here, possessing a complex personality that battles between moral decisions and his wild desires. The writing in the first few scenes of his arc—we find him in a bar having a natural conversation with a mysterious woman (Moran Atias) as we immediately discern his dislike for foreign environments (particularly Italy) and his highly talkative, forceful nature. Olivia Wilde and Liam Neeson share the screen in probably the most compelling storyline where Neeson's strong infatuation for Wilde lends itself to perfidy and constant ridicule. Wilde's character plays a hard-to-get, but incredibly seductive, "sexpot" who tests Neeson's true loyalty to her while he starts to construct his next novel. Mila Kunis' part of the tale is definitely the least intriguing in its somewhat clichéd essence— she's bouncing from job to job, barely able to pay her monthly bills and struggling to reclaim her kid who was taken from her based on accusations of abuse.
Like I said, all of these individual threads in an interlocking story initially engross, but then, Third Person starts to drag on and on. It sits at a runtime of 2 hours and 17 minutes but honestly feels like it's reaching the 3-hour mark. The connection between these separate stories begins to materialize the further we advance into the plot while also shadowing it with plenty of confusion at the same time. The last scene is a head-scratcher in a bad way. You're scratching your head because that "da dumb" twist moment unintentionally goes over everyone's head and falls flat in its execution. So, wait: how are they exactly connected thematically and emotionally? All I witnessed was a multitude of contrivances that saw these characters crossing each other's paths for a few seconds. Of course, there's a reason to all this once the very end comes to fruition, but the point of the entire ordeal sorely misses its mark. There's too much going on with the quick cutting intensifying as we progress, and none of the arcs conclude satisfyingly.
With that being said, I still respect Haggis' ambition and his ventures into such heart-rending tales. Contrary to general reception, I genuinely enjoyed Crash, and now, I most likely find myself enjoying Third Person more than most as well. It's primarily absorbing throughout, just a tad bit too long and woolly.
Extremely impressive--but don't watch the preview!
I enjoyed this movie so much, I don't even want to tell you anything about it. I just want you to watch it, then tell your friends to watch it, and tell them to tell their friends to watch it, and then we can all talk about it together. However, since the point of reading a review is to learn a bit about the movie, I'll have to tell you something.
Third Person strings together unrelated vignettes and manages, despite its long running time, to make you wish it continued for another hour. In one storyline, Liam Neeson is a successful author working on his next novel. He's married to Kim Basinger, but his mistress Olivia Wilde comes to visit him while he's in Paris. They have a tumultuous relationship with mind games and emotions flying wild, but fear not: if you find yourself wondering why they keep fighting and making up, all shall be revealed. In another vignette, Adrien Brody is in Italy on business, and while in a dive bar, he falls in love with a stranger. Moran Atias has her own mysterious struggle-as do all the women in the film-involving ransom money, and even though it's clearly a bad idea to get involved, Adrien can't help himself. The third story follows Mila Kunis in a custody battle with her ex-husband James Franco. Mila frustrates her lawyer, Maria Bello, with her irresponsibility and bad judgment, but there's much more to the situation than meets the eye. Each character is fascinating, as he or she sabotages their own goals and near-misses at happiness.
Whatever you do, don't watch the preview. It's compelling and dramatic, but it not only shows you the entire movie, including snippets from the end scenes, but it also blows a huge surprise that you're not supposed to know from the get-go. Just rent this movie, or better yet, buy yourself a copy. This is a movie you're going to need to watch over and over again to pick up nuances in the story and the actors' performances. A perfect choice for movie night with your friends, if you all like movies that inspire conversation for weeks afterwards, but it might not be the best choice to watch with your relatives.
Written and directed by Paul Haggis, it's a sure bet that each scene will feature the perfect amount of screen time before switching to the next character. The pace in this film is impeccable, and the performances are fantastic. While you expect Liam Neeson to be a pro and look sufficiently sad and frustrated, you don't expect Olivia Wilde to create incredible, indescribable expressions of self-loathing. James Franco is a strong dramatic actor, but who would believe Mila Kunis could keep up with him? Adrien Brody is given the simplest story, and he keeps it afloat by completely fleshing out his character with emotions not included in his spoken lines. You're going to be so impressed when you watch this movie. The acting, the fluid direction, and the precise, purposeful script are remarkable.
Kiddy Warning: Obviously, you have control over your own children. However, due to adult content, I wouldn't let my kids watch it.
Third Person strings together unrelated vignettes and manages, despite its long running time, to make you wish it continued for another hour. In one storyline, Liam Neeson is a successful author working on his next novel. He's married to Kim Basinger, but his mistress Olivia Wilde comes to visit him while he's in Paris. They have a tumultuous relationship with mind games and emotions flying wild, but fear not: if you find yourself wondering why they keep fighting and making up, all shall be revealed. In another vignette, Adrien Brody is in Italy on business, and while in a dive bar, he falls in love with a stranger. Moran Atias has her own mysterious struggle-as do all the women in the film-involving ransom money, and even though it's clearly a bad idea to get involved, Adrien can't help himself. The third story follows Mila Kunis in a custody battle with her ex-husband James Franco. Mila frustrates her lawyer, Maria Bello, with her irresponsibility and bad judgment, but there's much more to the situation than meets the eye. Each character is fascinating, as he or she sabotages their own goals and near-misses at happiness.
Whatever you do, don't watch the preview. It's compelling and dramatic, but it not only shows you the entire movie, including snippets from the end scenes, but it also blows a huge surprise that you're not supposed to know from the get-go. Just rent this movie, or better yet, buy yourself a copy. This is a movie you're going to need to watch over and over again to pick up nuances in the story and the actors' performances. A perfect choice for movie night with your friends, if you all like movies that inspire conversation for weeks afterwards, but it might not be the best choice to watch with your relatives.
Written and directed by Paul Haggis, it's a sure bet that each scene will feature the perfect amount of screen time before switching to the next character. The pace in this film is impeccable, and the performances are fantastic. While you expect Liam Neeson to be a pro and look sufficiently sad and frustrated, you don't expect Olivia Wilde to create incredible, indescribable expressions of self-loathing. James Franco is a strong dramatic actor, but who would believe Mila Kunis could keep up with him? Adrien Brody is given the simplest story, and he keeps it afloat by completely fleshing out his character with emotions not included in his spoken lines. You're going to be so impressed when you watch this movie. The acting, the fluid direction, and the precise, purposeful script are remarkable.
Kiddy Warning: Obviously, you have control over your own children. However, due to adult content, I wouldn't let my kids watch it.
10kosmasp
Persons
Paul Haggis did it again. At least for me he did. Obviously judging by the low rating, it hasn't had the same effect on others here. I really loved the movie, the intricacies, the connections and of course the "resolution". There might be a better word for the ending, but one thing is for sure: The movie demands more than one viewing. You can watch it with different eyes (your own, just a matter of speaking) and see things in a new light.
There's also trademark Haggis dialog, pointing in one direction, making fun of it, by almost straying away, than going full throttle on the first assumption you made. You may or may not like that, but it's what Haggis can do very good. And he has the actors to pull anything off, he gives them. It's a great movie with little hints here and there, that make sense in the end. Even if you don't get everything the first time around, it is a rewarding (viewing) experience
There's also trademark Haggis dialog, pointing in one direction, making fun of it, by almost straying away, than going full throttle on the first assumption you made. You may or may not like that, but it's what Haggis can do very good. And he has the actors to pull anything off, he gives them. It's a great movie with little hints here and there, that make sense in the end. Even if you don't get everything the first time around, it is a rewarding (viewing) experience
The kind of artistic effort we don't see enough of.
This is an excellent human drama. Any of the negative reviews you see about it are basically coming from a "dumbing down" stance. Like . . (duh) WHY is this director trying to be so intellectooul?" It's a damned clever piece of work, and we don't get that much any more in this age of comic book movies.
It is also VERY moving, and finely acted. Watching Olivia Wilde's character, I kept thinking, wow such a "borderline" case, then we find out precisely WHY she's such.
You should go see this and bring your brain with you. Don't tell anyone else what it's about or what the spoilers are, and I'm not either.
"White" - the color of trust, and belief, and lies.
It is also VERY moving, and finely acted. Watching Olivia Wilde's character, I kept thinking, wow such a "borderline" case, then we find out precisely WHY she's such.
You should go see this and bring your brain with you. Don't tell anyone else what it's about or what the spoilers are, and I'm not either.
"White" - the color of trust, and belief, and lies.
Did you know
- TriviaJames Franco said that Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis' husband (fiancé then), couldn't endure watching the scene where Franco had to slap Kunis' face and drag her across the floor. Kutcher had to leave the room during the shooting. "I mean, it wasn't my idea!! It was the script!" Franco said. Further to the close of this scene, when dragging Kunis out across the rug, Franco's stumble at the end was unscripted: but director Haggis felt it suited the scene's intensity so left it in the final take. [Latter direction reference from director's own DVD commentary]
- GoofsWhen Olivia Wilde's character is locked out of Liam Neeson's character hotel room, she is completely naked and in such conditions she runs down the corridor and stairs towards her own room. When she enters it, she can be seen wearing knickers.
- Crazy creditsThe opening as well as the first part of the ending credits share the same graphic pattern style as the lower parts of the glass partitions in the apartment of Franco's character.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Film '72: Episode dated 12 November 2014 (2014)
- SoundtracksChiaro
Performed by Gigi D'Alessio
Courtesy of GGD Srl.
Written by Gigi D'Alessio (as Luigi D'Alessio) and Valentina D'Agostina
Published by Warner Chappell Music Italiana Srl and GGD Edizioni Srl
All Rights Administered by Warner Chappell Music Italiana Srl
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Amores infieles
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $28,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $1,021,398
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $38,856
- Jun 22, 2014
- Gross worldwide
- $2,624,761
- Runtime
- 2h 17m(137 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






