User reviews

Its sad to see lazy script work still trying to make the typical anti brahmin rhetoric work in todays times.....plus the atempts to glorify other religions at the expense and tolerance one simply shows how oblivious the director and nayanthara are from ground realities.....the appeasement scenes dont make feel good but are absolutley cringy....master chefs look like uncles from a bar who had nothing better to do so they decided to act in this film.... Acting wise Nayanthara sleepwalks half the movie and all others are just happy to be working with her to really focus on their characters......finally much research was needed on the food element and not copy Rattetouille so evidently......taste buds are all dependant on your nose too....what u perceive is not dependant on only one sense....a very poor effort...

Brace yourselves for a cinematic masterpiece! This riveting film unfolds with a plot so exhilaratingly dull, it makes watching paint dry feel like a roller coaster ride. The characters? Oh, they're practically dripping with charisma, said no one ever.

Prepare to be swept away by the gripping screenplay that's as engaging as a blank wall. The plot twists are so mind-bogglingly hilarious; you'll question if you accidentally stumbled into a comedy instead of a cinematic marvel. And those dialogues? Well, let's just say Shakespeare would be green with envy.

As for the direction, it's a true blast from the past, bringing you the cutting-edge techniques of yesteryear. Move over, modern cinema! Nayanthara graces the screen looking like she stepped straight out of an AI-generated dream - because who needs real emotions anyway? Her performance, oh, it's a masterclass in monotony; forget about bringing anything new to the character, she's practically on repeat.

But fear not, dear viewer, because the production values are at least decent - if you consider "decent" a compliment. The cinematography? Oh, it's so fine that even your grandma's old home videos could give it a run for its money.

And the music? Well, it's the kind of dullness that could lull a caffeinated hummingbird into a deep slumber.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly and with overflowing enthusiasm, don't recommend this film. It's an absolute must-not-see for anyone who values their time and sanity.

The hate towards Annapoorani is unjustifiable and is motivating for me to give it ten stars, although I will give a seven for this film, it deserves a six. It is not a film that is aimed to spread false propaganda. For people, who watch Tamil films regularly, we know that we love spreading unity among religions and we have always included scenes in our films which portray the unity between the Hindus and the Muslims. Annapoorani has just done that.

Annapoorani narrates the tale of Annapoorani, a girl who is born in a Brahmin family, setting her aspirations to become India's best chef. Unfortunately, the Brahmin community doesn't eat non vegetarian and they see it as a sin, and her family has been traditionally cooking vegetarian food for the people who visit the temple and for the God himself.

Now, if Annapoorani's aspirations have to come true, she has to eat and cook non-vegetarian food which means that her ancestry is going to take a hit. Annapoorani is in a tough position much like the main character in the film 'Elemental'. Both of these films talk about a girl's aspirations getting hindered by parental/societal expectations. She might also be in love with a person who is not of her religion - this track of the story although was not explored much, does not promote love jihad.

The plot line of Annapoorani is solid. It has its heart straight in convincing people that religion/caste is just a belief and doesn't become your identity or define your actions. The film is typically progressive for people from the south and expectantly regressive for people from the north because they are aggressive about religion stuff.

The ideas of Annapoorani are fresh. The rivalry between the greatest chef in India and his son is cliche af. The cooking reality show in the film is much better than the actual reality shows that we see on movies. The films has taken cheesy steps to promote communal unity which was cringe-worthy.

I think negative publicity has a value and this movie is going to get even more popular thanks to our Vadakkan brothers. The greatest mistake ever made is to dub this film in Hindi. Must have avoided that.

160123NETFLIX Vetrrich Chelvan.

Lucky that I watched it in Netflix the day it was released. Well I don't understand with how this hurts the community sentiments as when lord Rama really hunted dear and there are inscriptions that they ate meat and eating meat is no where wrong as it is clearly prescribed in Ayurveda Charka Samaitha during certain ailments or basis on the requirement and talking about love jihad I didn't feel anything like that and what's wrong in loving a Muslim men when lord Perumal itself has a Muslim wife. Let's just not forget the humanity. This movie has nothing to do with religion it's purely creative.

The Annaprna Movie is a nothing but a mockery on everything and misuse of the name what AnnaPurna stands for. It's nothing but an attack on anything remotely Hindu and glorification of preparing food sourced form violence on speechless souls - no medical, no environmental no economical justification at all - it s brutal attack on those who stand for non violence of all kinds - not sure what Ghandhi Foundations do or want now a days

Here is the true story of the contestant who refused to kill n cook but was allowed to use paneer instead of fish as a part of the contest: search google for "Indian chef refused to cook nonveg peta"

Total zero. No surprise why this movie failed so badly. No proper message but pretending like a moral story in many scenes which is already seen in many old films, repeated masala wont work out and as many reviewers said it seems like a muslim appeasement movie which could have better avoided. Nayanthara makeup is too much in few scenes. Cooking film but cooking related is shown very little. In this ample of cooking techniqes, ideas and recipes they hardly choosed any. Waste of time. Nothing new. Could have passed the message with different concept. They failed in almost all the scenes. Even a failure movies few scenes would be thrilling and new but in this movie all are as usual. All the scenes are easily predictable. Some scenes seemed like power star comedy especially that namaz scene while cooking. Seriously, director has no knowledge at all. Evdn nayan acting seemed to be same like her previous movies. I skipped most of the scenes and finished watching this scene with in 20 to 30min. Overall very very boring hitech masala movie :))

I think this movie is just a soft conversion movie more than based on cooking. I don't know why they used Hindu Muslim concept in a cooking based movie which is ridiculous.

And quotes from Ramayana and other are just baseless. One of the scene in which nayantara started doing namaz instead of cooking. Thats the worst scene in this movie. I hope this review will be same as many. I have never reviewed any movie before but i can't stop myself after watching this one. And hopefully i wish that girls will watch kerala story and kashmir files instead of watching these kind of soft conversion movie.

The movie is utter waste of time of 2 hours 30 mins more, highlight is if your are Brahmin but when you do namaz the biriyani comes out well 😂 Joke of the year so you will find all these kind of appeasement and demeaning particular culture.

The movie would have been really good if they would have Removed religion cultural things( at least by not hurting one religion and promoting other religion) and instead promoted how a girl child can achieve goals in any career she deserves/wishes to be

Utter waste waste of time please spend quality time with some other good movie

I would say movie is purposely made to hurt ones sentiments.

I watched Annapoorani with high expectations, as I am a fan of Nayanthara and a lover of food. However, I was deeply disappointed and offended by the film, which I found to be a mockery of my culture and tradition. The film shows a Brahmin woman secretly reading recipes for non-vegetarian dishes, which are considered taboo by orthodox Brahmins. The film depicts a Muslim boy falling in love with a Brahmin girl, which is seen as a violation of their religious and social norms. The film mocks the Brahmin rituals and practices, such as wearing the sacred thread and chanting mantras. The film also has a predictable and cliched plot, with many convenient and unrealistic twists and turns. The film does not explore the culinary aspects of the story enough, and lacks the mouth-watering visuals of food that one would expect from a film about a chef. The film has some poor sensibility and logic-defying scenes, especially in the second half. I felt that the film was an insult to my beliefs and lifestyle, and I regret wasting my time and money on it. I would not recommend this film to anyone who respects their culture and tradition.

This is foolish movie with baseless story line. I am puzzled how lead actresses agreed to do this kind of movie. Simply appeasement to one community and showing disrespect to other communities.#Netflix movie selection team lost the mind in getting this kind off movie. Shame on #Netflix.

This is foolish movie with baseless story line. I am puzzled how lead actresses agreed to do this kind of movie. Simply appeasement to one community and showing disrespect to other communities.#Netflix movie selection team lost the mind in getting this kind off movie. Shame on #Netflix.

#Netflix team select right movies.

Lot of unnecessary drama is added to the movie, religion angle has nothing to do with story still makers have added it and the climax is most disappointing. Not recommended to watch by anyone. Movie starts very good colourful story however as it progress there are many times in movie where maker have hurt religious sentiments. This as audience is not acceptable. They story is very basic like any other chef movies in the past nothing new or innovative. Unfortunately it fails to impress the audience. We can easily predict the storyline of the movie, please watch it at your risk...................

Waste of time. While watching this Movie on Netflix, it felt like Switching Off multiple times. But, I kept on watching till the time the final Competition came where Chef Nayantara had to unnecessarily show off by wearing Hijab to get feeling for preparing Biryani in the Competition. That point, I couldn't control the Movie propaganda anymore.

Strangely in the entire Movie, "a Muslim" was showcased as "Pandit" who knows much more about Hindu Culture, Traditions and Purana's than Purohit. Muslim guy is continuously brainwashing by quoting irrelevant Sanskrit quotes and misguiding for wrong deeds.

Is that really an Inspirational Story of a Girl wanting to be Chef?

No, it was reality of How conversions and brain washing is done nowadays!

If world needs peace,unity & tranquility all religions must be decimated.

He began to question the contradictions in Hindu mythological stories. He believed that people used religion as a tool to deceive others, and he felt it was his responsibility to warn people against superstitions and priests.

Man treats woman as his own property and not as being capable of feelings, like himself. The way man treats women is much worse than the way landlords treat servants and the high-caste treat the low-caste. These treat them so demeaningly only in situations mutually affecting them; but men treat cruelly and as slaves, from their birth till death.

I have lost the faith in Indian movies be it Bollywood or South Movies. We are definitely number one in producing number of movies but I think quality is far from our reach.

Coming to Annapoorni, another pathetic movie in the club. When I compare this movie with one of the finest like "HUNGER" we are no where. Disastrous movie!.

I don't know when we will stop selling superstars and actually start selling good scripts with good writers. The theme of focusing on Superstars is common in Bollywood as well where people fillup theaters in the name of BIGGIES irrespective of focusing on contents.

I am sorry to say this but I have started losing faith in Indian cinema utter nonsense.

"Anapoorni" fails to live up to its name, offering a disappointing portrayal of a food lover. The film falls short in showcasing the art of cooking, leaving audiences feeling ashamed by its lack of substance. With an expectation for culinary delight, viewers are instead served a tasteless narrative that misses the opportunity to depict the joy of appeasement through food. Unfortunately, "Anapoorni" proves to be a letdown, lacking the essence and depth one would anticipate from a film centered around the love of food. The disappointment resonates as the movie struggles to capture the true essence of culinary passion, ultimately leaving audiences with a bitter aftertaste.

"Cultural Chaos"

"Cultural Chaos" disappoints on multiple fronts, earning a resounding thumbs down. Firstly, its offensive portrayal of various cultures leaves a sour taste, perpetuating harmful stereotypes that do more harm than entertain.

The film's content is a sorry excuse for storytelling, lacking depth and coherence. It meanders aimlessly, leaving audiences perplexed and unengaged throughout. The missed opportunity to convey the true essence of ethical choices, such as not eating meat and avoiding harm to animals, is evident. Instead, the narrative inexplicably veers into irrelevant territories like caste issues, muddying the waters of its intended message.

One of the film's major flaws is its blatant disregard for the values and traditions of different communities. It fails to appreciate the nuances of diverse belief systems, choosing instead to trample on cultural sensitivities. This oversight not only alienates viewers but also showcases a lack of respect for the rich tapestry of human experiences.

In summary, "Cultural Chaos" is a cinematic misstep, with offensive content, poor storytelling, and a misguided attempt to address ethical concerns. It fails to honor the essence of its subject matter, leaving audiences questioning its purpose and execution.

Worst movie in my entire life dont watch this non respected religion thoughts the dialogue writer had learnt the dialoges from the septic tank by ate the stuff at there he had wrote all dialogues are u ever seen at any one place that priest has lifted swords on their hands if they can do that are they cant save the kashmir m i right or wrong they were made to create the piece in our homes not to kill some one like chr-mus they killed somany in our country even though we are giving respect after that also they see our religion as fake theirs are truth is their any kind of a proof exists my answer is no....even they also dont have any kind of allah and jesus as a god proofs.

"Annapoorani - The Goddess of Food" attempts to weave a narrative around the culinary journey of Nayanthara's character, Annapoorani, an aspiring chef born into an orthodox vegetarian Brahmin family. The film explores her defiance of family beliefs, her rise to becoming India's Best Chef, and the challenges she faces, including the loss of her sense of taste.

However, the movie struggles right from the start with its inconsistent storytelling and character development. Annapoorani's heightened taste buds, initially presented as a unique and essential aspect of her character, are underutilized, leaving the audience wondering about the significance of this trait. The family, portrayed as orthodox vegetarians, is abruptly transformed into villains, seemingly cruel for preventing their daughter from pursuing her passion for cooking.

The film takes a questionable turn as Annapoorani, facing the limitations of being a vegetarian chef, starts consuming non-vegetarian food. This narrative choice overlooks the rich tradition of vegetarian cuisine in India and the existence of acclaimed vegetarian restaurants, challenging the notion that meat-based dishes are essential for culinary completeness.

The forced inclusion of Hindu and Islamic ideals in the storytelling adds a layer of discomfort and comes across as unnecessary preaching. The film's climax, featuring a Burkha, a blind taste test, and dramatic elements, is criticized as one of the worst-written scenes, further contributing to the overall narrative disappointment.

Despite a talented cast, including Nayanthara, Sathyaraj, Jai Sampath, Achyuth Kumar, and Karthik Kumar, the characters feel uneasy and unconvincing in their roles. The performances are hindered by the film's one-dimensional characterizations and wasted potential.

"Annapoorani - The Goddess of Food" is ultimately marred by its inconsistent plot, questionable narrative choices, and underdeveloped characters. While it aims to explore the world of culinary passion and familial conflicts, the execution falls short, leaving the audience with a sense of disappointment and missed opportunities.

The movie in question presents a narrative that stirs controversy as it navigates through a storyline involving a girl from an orthodox Brahmin family engaging in practices that seemingly defy the norms of her religious background. Specifically, the portrayal includes the character praying in a manner associated with a different religious tradition and, perhaps more notably, participating in the preparation and consumption of non-vegetarian food.

At the heart of the concern lies the delicate nature of religious sentiments and the potential impact on the audience. The deliberate or accidental inclusion of scenes depicting a character deviating from the customs of her orthodox Brahmin upbringing raises questions about the intentions behind such creative choices. Does the movie aim to challenge societal norms and explore the boundaries of religious identity, or does it inadvertently send a message that might be construed as disrespectful?

Religion, being a deeply personal and sensitive aspect of individuals' lives, often becomes a touchstone for filmmakers seeking to explore themes of identity, rebellion, or cultural clashes. In the case of this particular movie, the deviation from orthodox Brahmin practices becomes a symbolic representation of the character's journey, sparking a nuanced discussion about the intersection of personal beliefs and societal expectations.

One perspective on the film argues that the intentional inclusion of such scenes might be a deliberate attempt to challenge stereotypes and encourage viewers to question rigid religious boundaries. By showcasing a character who breaks away from the expected norms, the movie could be seen as advocating for individual freedom and the right to make personal choices, even when faced with societal or familial pressure.

On the other hand, critics may contend that the movie, by depicting religious practices in a potentially disrespectful light, crosses a line that could offend a significant portion of its audience. The portrayal of the girl engaging in practices associated with another religious tradition could be seen as a lack of sensitivity towards the diverse beliefs of the audience, particularly those who identify with the Brahmin community.

Furthermore, the preparation and consumption of non-vegetarian food may be viewed as a deliberate provocation, as vegetarianism holds a significant place in Brahmin dietary practices. The decision to depict the character diverging from this dietary restriction could be interpreted as a sensationalized move to generate controversy and attention, potentially overshadowing any artistic merit the film may have.

The impact of such a portrayal extends beyond the screen, as it has the potential to influence real-world perceptions and attitudes. In a diverse society, where religious harmony is often delicately balanced, the responsibility of filmmakers to tread carefully in representing various faiths becomes paramount. The controversy surrounding the movie raises questions about the ethical considerations involved in storytelling, especially when it comes to matters as sensitive as religious beliefs.

In analyzing the audience's reaction to the film, it is essential to consider the diversity of perspectives within the Brahmin community and the broader society. While some viewers may appreciate the film's bold approach in challenging traditional norms, others may find it offensive and disrespectful. Striking a balance between creative expression and cultural sensitivity becomes a formidable task for filmmakers, as they navigate the fine line between pushing boundaries and avoiding unnecessary provocation.

It is worth examining whether the movie, in its attempt to create a thought-provoking narrative, could have achieved its goals without potentially offending religious sentiments. Filmmakers often grapple with the challenge of addressing societal issues while maintaining a degree of sensitivity to diverse beliefs. The portrayal of religious practices on screen requires a nuanced approach that acknowledges the significance of these practices to individuals and communities.

In conclusion, the movie's depiction of a girl from an orthodox Brahmin family engaging in practices that deviate from her religious background is a contentious choice that sparks debate about the boundaries of creative expression. Whether intentional or accidental, the portrayal raises questions about the responsibility of filmmakers in handling sensitive subjects, especially when it comes to matters of religious beliefs. The impact of such depictions on the audience's perceptions and the potential for real-world consequences underscore the need for a thoughtful and nuanced approach to storytelling that respects the diverse beliefs of the audience.

The movie has been well cast. The inherent conflict that Nayanthara's character goes through in choosing between her passion and the values she's been raised with are well portrayed. Orthodoxy and culture is varied and impact the life style and career choices people make in India and this film has made a decent attempt in portraying it. I had 15 mins or so left in the movie when it was abruptly withdrawn by Netflix. This is an unfortunate fallout of the political atmosphere and the prevailing hyper-sensitive sentiment in India but that's besides the point. Overall a good take in my opinion and highly recommended.