I appreciate Jim's work, and this is no exception, although this one didn't resonate with me as much. I actually agree with Jim's perspective! Big studios like Disney/Marvel and Warner Bros/DC sometimes prioritize profit over creativity, feeding into people's desire for escapism and nostalgia. It's a theme ripe for satire, and we are currently witnessing a flourishing era for such content. However, I wonder if it's truly productive for independent creators to produce cynical films that fuel disdain. Should we criticize individuals who, in their final moments, seek comfort in their favorite superhero or movie franchise to briefly escape their harsh realities? Instead of mocking their choices, perhaps we should respect their need for solace. Films like Vera Drew's The People's Joker and Todd Rohal's Rat Pack Rat effectively blend humor with profound insights into our complex relationship with pop culture, while also delving into themes of death and sexuality. These movies strike a balance between satire and sincerity, earning their moments of on-screen intimacy. The ongoing debate about the legitimacy of superhero movies as "real movies" tends to tire and irritate me. People who work on superhero films can also work on good, independent projects with deep themes. There was a story that the recent Batman Christmas movie brought joy to children at a hospital in Houston. It's okay to feel emotional and touched by such moments, rather than feeling pressured to scorn individuals for seeking comfort in mainstream entertainment. If superhero movies are not your cup of tea, it's perfectly fine to pursue other interests. Ultimately, there is no harm in appreciating both mainstream and art house cinema, as well as popular superhero characters alongside classic cinematic masterpieces. Many individuals in my circle share this sentiment, so why should there be any conflict?
