Nobody 2

Nobody 2 is a step back from the first film. Its story is shallow and just an excuse for repetitive action scenes. Unlike the first movie, this time we face stupid enemies who create no sense of threat! Even the action, despite its violence, doesn't match the creativity of the bus scene in the first film.

However, I watched this movie only to see Bob Odenkirk. He is always charismatic, but unfortunately, in this sequel, he didn't have enough space to showcase his unique acting and got lost in the weak storyline. In my opinion, go watch "Nobody 1" and forget this one entirely! 😄😄

From the very first scene, you know exactly how it's going to go: one man, armed with a gun or a stick, will take down dozens of trained soldiers without so much as a scratch. Suspense? None.

Humor? Missing.

Credibility? Gone.

In the first film, Odenkirk and his father being unstoppable was already pushing it... but when this "superpower" starts spreading to characters with zero connection to their world, it gets flat-out embarrassing.

The plot feels like it was written in grade school: no context, no atmosphere, no growth-just one absurd episode after another. Every scene is so predictable you can call it before it happens... and you'll always be right.

If you want over-the-top, logic-free action, there are countless better options in the genre. Watching Bob Odenkirk-Saul Goodman himself-wasted on such an empty script is just painful.

Nobody 2? I recommend it to nobody 2.

Your turn - did you like it, or is it a hard pass?

Timo Tjahjanto's Nobody 2 is a relentless, bone-crunching sequel that doubles down on the first film's blend of suburban angst and bloody mayhem. This time, Bob Odenkirk's Hutch Mansell is on vacation, which of course becomes a backdrop for an insane series of creatively staged, over-the-top fight sequences. Tjahjanto, known for his work on action films like The Night Comes for Us, brings a distinct, stylized flair to the violence, turning the tranquil setting of a small town and an amusement park into a series of deadly playgrounds. The plot is thin and largely exists to string together these incredible set pieces, but that's not a criticism-the movie knows exactly what it is. It's a joyful, unpretentious action romp. The action is more outlandish and even more graphic than the original, with a dark, cartoonish sense of humor that differentiates it from the more grounded, noirish tone of the first film.

Some critics have noted that the sequel loses some of the original's gritty charm in favor of a more comedic, outlandish style, but praise the film for being an entertaining and satisfying follow-up.

Is it worth watching? If you're a fan of the first film and are looking for a fun, fast-paced action movie that doesn't take itself too seriously, then absolutely.

If it wasn't for Sharon Stone's God awful acting, I would have given this an 8 star rating. I haven't seen a role played this badly in I don't know how long. She played her role as if they asked her to play it like a brain-dead lunatic and then she went overboard with it. Don't waste theatre money on this, wait for it to stream. The rest I enjoyed a lot and the fighting was very good.

It's really just almost the same scenario as the first movie, just not executed as well... the boat scene is supposed to be the equivalent of the bus scene in the first movie, it's just not as good.

Same movie different, bad guys, lesser well executed fighting scenes, felt a bit lazy.

And there's not really any character evolution... I gave a 6 as it was still entertaining, and there's were scenes worth watching,