10 reviews
"An Ice Palace Romance (2023)" skates just above thin ice, managing to deliver a lukewarm blend of predictability and charm. The film follows the well-trodden path of a big-city journalist, Emma, who returns to her quaint hometown only to face her childhood fears and, of course, a dormant love for ice skating. The plot, as cozy and predictable as a pair of old mittens, offers few surprises. It's the cinematic equivalent of a comfort food dish - not particularly exciting, but satisfying in its own right.
The saving grace of the film lies in its heartwarming dynamics between Lori, the rink owner Mark, and his precociously adorable daughter, Zoe. Their chemistry is as smooth as a freshly Zambonied ice surface. Mark, with his rugged charm and dad jokes, brings a lightness to the story, while Zoe's earnest enthusiasm for skating and matchmaking adds a sparkle of joy. However, the film's reliance on clichés feels as rehearsed as a figure skating routine.
In conclusion, "An Ice Palace Romance" is the kind of film you watch while wrapped in a blanket, sipping hot chocolate, and not expecting any cinematic revolutions. It's a feel-good movie that skates by on its charm and the sheer predictability of its plot. It doesn't aim for a triple axel of storytelling and settles for a steady glide. It's a three-star film - not because it's exceptional, but because it's comfortably okay, like a familiar pair of skates that have seen better days but still fit just right.
The saving grace of the film lies in its heartwarming dynamics between Lori, the rink owner Mark, and his precociously adorable daughter, Zoe. Their chemistry is as smooth as a freshly Zambonied ice surface. Mark, with his rugged charm and dad jokes, brings a lightness to the story, while Zoe's earnest enthusiasm for skating and matchmaking adds a sparkle of joy. However, the film's reliance on clichés feels as rehearsed as a figure skating routine.
In conclusion, "An Ice Palace Romance" is the kind of film you watch while wrapped in a blanket, sipping hot chocolate, and not expecting any cinematic revolutions. It's a feel-good movie that skates by on its charm and the sheer predictability of its plot. It doesn't aim for a triple axel of storytelling and settles for a steady glide. It's a three-star film - not because it's exceptional, but because it's comfortably okay, like a familiar pair of skates that have seen better days but still fit just right.
It's set at Christmastime in Michigan. But, really, the story could just as easily have happened during the summer in Arizona. It's about an indoor ice rink.
I liked the two leads. But the antagonist was an arrogant jerk in a movie that didn't even need a villain. It would have been more interesting if he was a kindhearted developer who simply had a different viewpoint than the rink owner.
Come to think of it, I would like to have seen more ice-skating, less drama outside the rink. The movie should have really focused on the protagonist overcoming her past, finding new purpose in the ice, and saving the rink.
I liked the two leads. But the antagonist was an arrogant jerk in a movie that didn't even need a villain. It would have been more interesting if he was a kindhearted developer who simply had a different viewpoint than the rink owner.
Come to think of it, I would like to have seen more ice-skating, less drama outside the rink. The movie should have really focused on the protagonist overcoming her past, finding new purpose in the ice, and saving the rink.
- athompsonblue
- Dec 14, 2023
- Permalink
Yes folks another Hallmark plot to save something, in the past they've saved a wine business, a farm, a restaurant, a micro brewery, and even Christmas! This time the story involves SAVING AN ICE PALACE, (which is actually a skating rink and center of the small town festivities, "palace" makes it sound more important) Journalist, Lori, played by Celeste Desjardins faces her fears regarding a skating incident that happened from her past, and returns to her hometown to do a story. She meets the ice rink owner, Mark, played by Marcus Rosner, who is attempting to save the rink from greedy developers. All the while this is going on, there's a subplot where Lori also helps Mark's young daughter,Zoe, to try to realize her skating dreams, as Lori reflects on her own life. The movie is very predictable but the chemistry between Mark and Lori captures your attention. And Marc Rosner is one of my favorite actors and he's hot, hot, hot! It's just another pleasant "guilty pleasure" movie from Hallmark.
This movie is an excellent remedy for insomnia. Based on the setting in an ice rink and the typical Hallmark plot of a young woman going back to her hometown, I wasn't expecting much from this movie. It was really boring for the first 30 minutes. Hardly anything happens other than the lead female heading to her hometown and finding out the local town single dad is into her. But the lead actors have about as much chemistry as wallpaper paste. The lead actor looks bored. The workaholic boss is loud and demanding. So many cliches. The acting is stiff and the lead actress recites her lines like she's reading from a teleprompter. The hilarious part is how the townspeople are supposed to be impressed by her figure skating skills. The lead actress (if it's even really her) can barely twirl in a circle on skates and the audience is supposed to believe she won skating awards as a teenager? The reality is that figure skating is a time-consuming and expensive sport. The casting directors could have cast some real skaters as body doubles or extras to make the skating scenes more believable. And of course, the premise of the single dad falling for the single woman from the city is so overplayed. Hallmark isn't exactly known for being original but these same plots are so trite. Save your sanity and watch something else.
- touchthesky-83210
- Aug 17, 2024
- Permalink
Another "big city girl returns home" story from Hallmark - only to find it is where she belongs. I sure wish they would come up with different storylines. This one has been done to death. The leads are OK. There was some compatibility between the two. The skating daughter was cute. Lori decides to help coach her - even though she gave up skating long ago. Although, I have never heard of an up-and-coming skate champion giving it up because she fell. Ummmm ... I've watched the Olympics ... many skaters fall on the world stage and pick themselves up and continue. They don't just quit. Seemed pretty unrealistic to me. AND PLEASE! Stop with the flamboyant gay men! I know a lot of gay men - the majority do not behave like this. HALLMARK - in your quest to be "all-inclusive" you are defining this ALL WRONG. I'm certainly OK with gays being included in your stories - I am over you depicting them ALL as flamboyant. It's ridiculous. You should know this - you cast a lot of gay men in straight, romantic roles (Jonathan Bennett, Luke McFarlane, Peter Porte - to name three). Give it a rest!
This movie wasn't exactly a cinematic masterpiece, but oh, the model of the new ultra-modern building at the architectural firm truly stole the show. The quaint town, in a desperate bid to revamp their cozy downtown, decided to go full dystopian. They commissioned a high-rise that was the epitome of bleak - a gray, windowless monolith that could easily be mistaken for a gigantic parking garage.
The town planners, in their infinite wisdom, decided that the roof of this dreary edifice would be the town's new social hotspot. Because obviously, when you think of lively gatherings, a parking garage rooftop springs to mind.
And then, as if this architectural wonder wasn't already a marvel, the planners added another 10 stories of 'residential space' above. These living quarters were so laughably small, residents could barely fit inside. One might stand there, sandwiched between the walls, staring out into the void, thinking, "Why do I live here? My 'apartment' can't even fit a bed, and I have to limbo dance just to get through the door."
In this movie, the building model wasn't just a structure; it was a bold statement on the absurdity of modern urban planning, a tongue-in-cheek nod to the lengths we go to in the name of progress.
The town planners, in their infinite wisdom, decided that the roof of this dreary edifice would be the town's new social hotspot. Because obviously, when you think of lively gatherings, a parking garage rooftop springs to mind.
And then, as if this architectural wonder wasn't already a marvel, the planners added another 10 stories of 'residential space' above. These living quarters were so laughably small, residents could barely fit inside. One might stand there, sandwiched between the walls, staring out into the void, thinking, "Why do I live here? My 'apartment' can't even fit a bed, and I have to limbo dance just to get through the door."
In this movie, the building model wasn't just a structure; it was a bold statement on the absurdity of modern urban planning, a tongue-in-cheek nod to the lengths we go to in the name of progress.
I seem to be making a habit of starting reviews while watching and at least halfway through, while reading other reviews. This one passed my first 10 minutes test, and I'm really glad I didn't hit delete. So far it's been a great watch. Of course Marcus Rosner is impeccable, love his acting! I'm not as familiar with Celeste Desjardins, but she proves to be a worthy love interest and I thought that their chemistry was cute. The daughter, Zoe is a wonderful addition and great skater. Showing that when you fall, you need to get up and try again! The other supporting actors are all wonderful and I really enjoyed their side stories.
Well, gotta go, the drama is beginning. Give this a watch, you won't be disappointed!
Well, gotta go, the drama is beginning. Give this a watch, you won't be disappointed!
- bfoster-33680
- Jul 27, 2024
- Permalink
Celeste Desjardins ruins this entire movie with the constant fake smiling and botox face all the way through the film accompanied by the fake voice. She can barely move any of her face.......
At 27 why does she need botox or is she really 37 or 47 and faking her age too? Just don't get it...... such a pretty talented girl does not need all this fakery.........
Shannon McDonough was fun and real as the local photographer sussing out all the false motives for a new money-making plan.
Julia Dyan as the sister had potential. The stereotypical gay best-friend was just plain annoying.
Please just bring us some lovely skating instead of this fiasco!
At 27 why does she need botox or is she really 37 or 47 and faking her age too? Just don't get it...... such a pretty talented girl does not need all this fakery.........
Shannon McDonough was fun and real as the local photographer sussing out all the false motives for a new money-making plan.
Julia Dyan as the sister had potential. The stereotypical gay best-friend was just plain annoying.
Please just bring us some lovely skating instead of this fiasco!
I was hoping HM would stay on the new course of producing better movies and diff storylines. Obviously it didn't happen with this Tty rob com if you can call it that And please can the male lead ever comb his hair. What gives with the hairstylists for HM? The leads have no chemistry and the best actor was the major. She was the most believable.
I don't understand why HM keeps producing these tired stories and use leads that have no chemistry.
It's like they don't care for their audience I don't expect Oscar nominated movies but at least a three star showing. This by far is my most Cristal review I have ever written but HM has to step up their game or say good bye.
I don't understand why HM keeps producing these tired stories and use leads that have no chemistry.
It's like they don't care for their audience I don't expect Oscar nominated movies but at least a three star showing. This by far is my most Cristal review I have ever written but HM has to step up their game or say good bye.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of this movie. On paper, it should be a pretty good tv Christmas movie. But then things went wrong...
First, I'll start with the obvious, too obvious, actually. I hate to be the one that critises a movie based on the makeup of the leading lady but it's quite the eyesore. Why must you give her duckface lips? WHY? What's wrong with her normal lipline? Also, do we really have to make her eyes look extra droopy with the weird eyeshadow contouring thing? The makeup people made the leading lady, whose face is constantly close to the camera, look like a droopy duckface. Maybe it's not such an eyesore when you're watching at a distance but with computer streaming and high quality screens and cameras, it's really just unacceptable.
Secondly, where is the romance? If you told me this was about two friends instead of a couple, I might've reconsidered my rating. There was just no chemistry at all and the only bit of romance we got was a very awkward little peck on the lips. Just because a movie is family friendly, doesn't mean there can't be any romance. There are a few little attempts at compliments from the leading man which were mildly convincing, but this appears to be because he's a far more natural actor.
Thirdly, Celeste Desjardins performance is lacking in quality. She's not super bad but she's too uptight in this movie. It doesn't come across as a character being "themselves" but rather as an actress that put on the character's costume and is playing until someone yells "cut". While this is of course how acting works, the viewer is not supposed feel that. Her performance is just not credible enough for a leading role. I was waiting for her to drop the fake smile and the "Lori" act and for someone to yell "cut".
On the plus side, the story is good, there was no fake snow that was painfully, obviously fake, I love the ice skating theme, and Marcus Rosner kind of saved this movie acting wise.
Not a complete waste of time but with a little more effort and attention to detail, it could've been far more enjoyable to sit through.
First, I'll start with the obvious, too obvious, actually. I hate to be the one that critises a movie based on the makeup of the leading lady but it's quite the eyesore. Why must you give her duckface lips? WHY? What's wrong with her normal lipline? Also, do we really have to make her eyes look extra droopy with the weird eyeshadow contouring thing? The makeup people made the leading lady, whose face is constantly close to the camera, look like a droopy duckface. Maybe it's not such an eyesore when you're watching at a distance but with computer streaming and high quality screens and cameras, it's really just unacceptable.
Secondly, where is the romance? If you told me this was about two friends instead of a couple, I might've reconsidered my rating. There was just no chemistry at all and the only bit of romance we got was a very awkward little peck on the lips. Just because a movie is family friendly, doesn't mean there can't be any romance. There are a few little attempts at compliments from the leading man which were mildly convincing, but this appears to be because he's a far more natural actor.
Thirdly, Celeste Desjardins performance is lacking in quality. She's not super bad but she's too uptight in this movie. It doesn't come across as a character being "themselves" but rather as an actress that put on the character's costume and is playing until someone yells "cut". While this is of course how acting works, the viewer is not supposed feel that. Her performance is just not credible enough for a leading role. I was waiting for her to drop the fake smile and the "Lori" act and for someone to yell "cut".
On the plus side, the story is good, there was no fake snow that was painfully, obviously fake, I love the ice skating theme, and Marcus Rosner kind of saved this movie acting wise.
Not a complete waste of time but with a little more effort and attention to detail, it could've been far more enjoyable to sit through.