Welcome to the new era of bad movies with high ratings !
Now, this is not the same as it used to be, where people who were fans of B flicks. Oh no, this is on a MUCH GREATER level of WTF!?!?!
The new phase of millennial movie pleasure stems from the worst equate to the better. Bad acting IS a plus. WTF?!?!?! CGI, gore,blood or any prosthetic that looks like an arm from a department store equates to sheer pleasure for this audience of viewers.
The movie, for those of you born prior to 1982, is horrid. Bad acting, worst effects and a plot that...well, simply does not exist :) Imagine HOSTEL level gore with cigarette money investment.
I understand these appeal to a newer group of viewers that even B fans shake their heads at, but how to rectify this ? IMDb needs another CHECK BOX group beside reviews :)
A simple click your star does not suffice. There needs to be ANOTHER bar that indicates age. So when you see 900 people give it a 8 star and are 17-24 and then see that 500 people give it a 3 or lower are 30-50, you then have a VIABLE option when considering the "Am I wasting money or am I paying for what I MAY view as entertainment"
If you like basement level movies, this is for you ! If you like horror along the lines of "The Strangers" or "Wolf Creek" (We already know it's no Hostel) then this is NOT for you.
This is one of those movies that is SO BAD it will not be considered "Worst" of a period because of the minimal funds invested to make it. Yes, this is more like a class project that someone suckered an investor for and the bulk of the funds were spent on beer bongs and prostitutes.
BUT ! If you ARE a "Silly/bad" millennial horror fan, this one should tickle you pink!