D Airey
Joined Sep 2000
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews27
D Airey's rating
I've learned my lesson. I was going to skip this movie until I checked it out on IMDb. Wow, three people gave it a pretty good review. Maybe it's worth a chance. After watching the movie, it now appears these people had some vested interest in posting other than a fair review of the movie. Take, for instance, Jon H Ochiai. After I saw this terrible movie, I wondered who in the world would recommend an obvious stinker like this. So I took a look at some of Mr. Ochiai's other reviews. This guy appears to be someone with classical training as a movie reviewer, except there are no bad recommendations in his voluminous collection of reviews. I'm guessing there must be some cottage industry for people that can't land a steady gig for a real media outlet, so they pump these movies while they wait for an honest job.
Lesson one: Sci-Fi makes terrible movies. I'll not watch another premier.
Lesson two: There are people that pump these movies just like they have people pumping stocks on Yahoo. Though I still have trouble envisioning the economic model (are they really paid, or like the bad guys in these movies, are they just pure evil).
Lesson three: There are no low budget movies with four writers that are worth watching.
Lesson one: Sci-Fi makes terrible movies. I'll not watch another premier.
Lesson two: There are people that pump these movies just like they have people pumping stocks on Yahoo. Though I still have trouble envisioning the economic model (are they really paid, or like the bad guys in these movies, are they just pure evil).
Lesson three: There are no low budget movies with four writers that are worth watching.
This mini-series is a waste of time. My overall reaction after watching the opening segment is that you couldn't have placed more clichés in the movie if you had been trying to make a parody. In fact, if you had given the actors instructions to ham it up a little, it could be called "Not Another Fantasy Adventure". Now some may argue that it's unfair to review a four hour movie after just the first two hours, but my conscience compels me to warn others: This is an empty story that doesn't contain a single original thought. Everything is predictable.
We have Luke/Harry Potter/Ged meeting Obi Wan Kenobi/Gandalf and being sent to Hogwarts. While at Hogwarts, Luke/Harry Potter/Ged meets the generic, fat, comic relief sidekick. Later, Dumbledore/Gandalf/Archmangus is killed by the generic, twisted bad guy King/General because Malfoy/Jasper is a traitor (and not a single wizard saw it coming). We have the sisterhood from Dune and elements of Lord Foul's Bane in the indestructible beast that is controlled by knowing its name.
This is a good movie to watch if you are hooked up to a life-support system and you've already seen every movie and television show ever made. This story is also a good idea for people who've never read a book or seen a movie and want to jam the entire fantasy genre into a single four hour sitting.
We have Luke/Harry Potter/Ged meeting Obi Wan Kenobi/Gandalf and being sent to Hogwarts. While at Hogwarts, Luke/Harry Potter/Ged meets the generic, fat, comic relief sidekick. Later, Dumbledore/Gandalf/Archmangus is killed by the generic, twisted bad guy King/General because Malfoy/Jasper is a traitor (and not a single wizard saw it coming). We have the sisterhood from Dune and elements of Lord Foul's Bane in the indestructible beast that is controlled by knowing its name.
This is a good movie to watch if you are hooked up to a life-support system and you've already seen every movie and television show ever made. This story is also a good idea for people who've never read a book or seen a movie and want to jam the entire fantasy genre into a single four hour sitting.