Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews14
WizardX's rating
I'm a big fan of Miyazaki's work, and having seen everything else he's done, I had to see Howl as soon as I could locate a subtitled version. Unfortunately, I must rank it among his weaker efforts. It's certainly not a BAD film - I don't think the man is capable of that - but after the brilliance of Mononoke, and Spirited Away, I was disappointed.
The big problem, putting it bluntly, is that the movie makes no sense. It's possible the fansub I was watching mangled it, but I can't imagine a way for the script to be written to make the events cohesive. It takes the dream-logic of Spirited Away, but takes it to a point that it becomes nearly impossible to get "into" the movie. With Spirited, you always felt like there were rules to the world, even if as an outsider you didn't understand them. This never seemed the case with Howl.
Furthermore, Miyazaki seems to have dipped into his bag of stock tricks a bit too often. There's little in here that you haven't seen in some form in his previous films. There doesn't appear to be anything new he has to say with this film, it's just retreading the themes that have run throughout his work. I could easily forgive Mononoke as being a thematic remake of Nausicaa, since I feel his message had grown sufficiently in the decade separating those films to be worth repeating. That's not the case here.
But, as I said, it's still not a bad film. I suspect people who haven't seen all of Miyazaki's canon will find it quite enjoyable. The richness and nuance of his character animation continues to grow. No one makes more expressive animated figures than Miyazaki, and the characters alone nearly carry the film. And supported by another wonderful score by Joe Hisaishi, as in all of Miyazaki's works, there are moments of staggering beauty rarely seen in films of any genre or style.
And despite the incomprehensibility of the plot, he makes it compelling and watchable, even as you have no clue what's going on or why.
So, I give the movie an above-average rating and a recommendation, simply on the strength of being a Miyazaki film. The worst of his movies is still better than just about anything else out there. But the purists are likely to be a bit disappointed.
The big problem, putting it bluntly, is that the movie makes no sense. It's possible the fansub I was watching mangled it, but I can't imagine a way for the script to be written to make the events cohesive. It takes the dream-logic of Spirited Away, but takes it to a point that it becomes nearly impossible to get "into" the movie. With Spirited, you always felt like there were rules to the world, even if as an outsider you didn't understand them. This never seemed the case with Howl.
Furthermore, Miyazaki seems to have dipped into his bag of stock tricks a bit too often. There's little in here that you haven't seen in some form in his previous films. There doesn't appear to be anything new he has to say with this film, it's just retreading the themes that have run throughout his work. I could easily forgive Mononoke as being a thematic remake of Nausicaa, since I feel his message had grown sufficiently in the decade separating those films to be worth repeating. That's not the case here.
But, as I said, it's still not a bad film. I suspect people who haven't seen all of Miyazaki's canon will find it quite enjoyable. The richness and nuance of his character animation continues to grow. No one makes more expressive animated figures than Miyazaki, and the characters alone nearly carry the film. And supported by another wonderful score by Joe Hisaishi, as in all of Miyazaki's works, there are moments of staggering beauty rarely seen in films of any genre or style.
And despite the incomprehensibility of the plot, he makes it compelling and watchable, even as you have no clue what's going on or why.
So, I give the movie an above-average rating and a recommendation, simply on the strength of being a Miyazaki film. The worst of his movies is still better than just about anything else out there. But the purists are likely to be a bit disappointed.
This one is easily an underrated classic, and one of the few films I actually like better every time I see it. It has all of the elements of your standard "swords and sandals" fantasy - the buxom warrior babes, the bloody swordfights, the unstoppable hero - but what makes it work are a few choice directorial decisions made by John Millius.
Most of these sorts of movies get bogged down in heavy-handed, or simply corny, dialog. Millius's decision was to stip out every bit of dialogue that wasn't absolutely needed for the story, and allow huge chunks of the movie to play out in near silence. The movie is 90% carried solely by the visuals and Basil Poledouris' incredible operatic soundtrack. This allowed them to show a story which would normally be trite, cliched, and even corny in such a way that it comes off more like a Wagner production.
It even has surprising depth, or at least the illusion thereof. By stripping out the dialogue, the movie *suggests* as much as it actually tells, which adds greatly to its rewatchability. Why, for example, does Conan laugh upon the Tree of Woe? We're never told, we're only given the vaguest hints - but contemplating what could have been going through Conan's mind at that point makes it appear far richer.
Excellent photography and an almost dream-like flow furhter add to it. But if artistic stuff isn't your bag, it also has loads of sex, nudity, and some truly spectacular battle scenes. And contrary to a lot of reviewers, I love James Earl Jones' understated performance as Thulsa Doom. Chewing the scenery and going over the top would have been too easy. Instead he is the wolf in sheep's clothing, someone you *know* to be evil, yet casts a seductive air of love and peace around him.
All in all, a truly great action movie, and one that deserves to keep being seen.
Most of these sorts of movies get bogged down in heavy-handed, or simply corny, dialog. Millius's decision was to stip out every bit of dialogue that wasn't absolutely needed for the story, and allow huge chunks of the movie to play out in near silence. The movie is 90% carried solely by the visuals and Basil Poledouris' incredible operatic soundtrack. This allowed them to show a story which would normally be trite, cliched, and even corny in such a way that it comes off more like a Wagner production.
It even has surprising depth, or at least the illusion thereof. By stripping out the dialogue, the movie *suggests* as much as it actually tells, which adds greatly to its rewatchability. Why, for example, does Conan laugh upon the Tree of Woe? We're never told, we're only given the vaguest hints - but contemplating what could have been going through Conan's mind at that point makes it appear far richer.
Excellent photography and an almost dream-like flow furhter add to it. But if artistic stuff isn't your bag, it also has loads of sex, nudity, and some truly spectacular battle scenes. And contrary to a lot of reviewers, I love James Earl Jones' understated performance as Thulsa Doom. Chewing the scenery and going over the top would have been too easy. Instead he is the wolf in sheep's clothing, someone you *know* to be evil, yet casts a seductive air of love and peace around him.
All in all, a truly great action movie, and one that deserves to keep being seen.
This has become my favorite bad movie of all time. Like the person a bit below who can't stop watching it, I have to pull it out every few months. That's not to say I think any part of it is any good - but it's so excellently wretched as to be one of the funniest movies ever made. (actually, that's not entirely true. This is, AFAIK, the first film to feature a full-on Pern style dragon dogfight. And that IS cool) Things to watch and/or drink to:
1)Every time that Snails (Wayans) talks like a modern person. I don't think he has a single line which is "in character" for the time period.
1a)Notice him mocking Damodar. I don't think the director realized he was being serious.
2)Damodar - slowest villian in history? All together now! "I... will... KILL... you... ... ... slooowwwwlllyyyy..." By the time he says one line, everyone has time to flee.
2a)and make sure to mock his blue lipstick mercilessly.
3)Jeremy Irons delivering the best manically-over-the-top villian performance ever. I don't think there's an adjective to adequately describe his style here. ("Wagnerian" is far too subtle and restrained)
3a)And notice his eyebrows. How did he do that? It's like his forehead put on a completely separate, but equally rediculous, performance.
4)Anything with Richard O'Brien is cool and funny. He appears fully aware how rediculous the movie is and milks it for all he can.
4a)Look at Marina's face when he gropes her. That was NOT reheared.
5)And finally, observe a moment of silence for poor Tom ("Dr Who") Baker, who actually attempts (and nearly succeeds) in bringing a moment of quiet dignity to a film that has, and indeed deserves, none.
1)Every time that Snails (Wayans) talks like a modern person. I don't think he has a single line which is "in character" for the time period.
1a)Notice him mocking Damodar. I don't think the director realized he was being serious.
2)Damodar - slowest villian in history? All together now! "I... will... KILL... you... ... ... slooowwwwlllyyyy..." By the time he says one line, everyone has time to flee.
2a)and make sure to mock his blue lipstick mercilessly.
3)Jeremy Irons delivering the best manically-over-the-top villian performance ever. I don't think there's an adjective to adequately describe his style here. ("Wagnerian" is far too subtle and restrained)
3a)And notice his eyebrows. How did he do that? It's like his forehead put on a completely separate, but equally rediculous, performance.
4)Anything with Richard O'Brien is cool and funny. He appears fully aware how rediculous the movie is and milks it for all he can.
4a)Look at Marina's face when he gropes her. That was NOT reheared.
5)And finally, observe a moment of silence for poor Tom ("Dr Who") Baker, who actually attempts (and nearly succeeds) in bringing a moment of quiet dignity to a film that has, and indeed deserves, none.