rosian
Joined Jan 2007
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews40
rosian's rating
I can't comment on the actual movie as I refuse to go to see it as the trailer and raves by gratuitous gore-lovers have put me off completely when I had originally expected to see it. I liked earlier Burton work and most especially anything with Johnny Depp and I was hoping this movie would raise the level of the dreadful Sondheim music which I tried to listen to years ago and gave up on as it was just so boring. But then it's rare for me to appreciate anything this self-satisfied composer Sondheim has produced with the one exception of In the Park with George which was a clever idea and nicely presented visually even though the music was as usual simply awful.
I worked for years in the Fleet Street vicinity so was very well aware of this famous old story. It would have been good to see a movie based on it - but not when it's covered in gratuitous gruesome gore and disturbing scenes which according to the write-ups it is. I would guess even Sondheim managed a few laughs in his stage musical and the gore wasn't meant to be quite so gratuitous? So my one star indicates absolute disappointment.
I worked for years in the Fleet Street vicinity so was very well aware of this famous old story. It would have been good to see a movie based on it - but not when it's covered in gratuitous gruesome gore and disturbing scenes which according to the write-ups it is. I would guess even Sondheim managed a few laughs in his stage musical and the gore wasn't meant to be quite so gratuitous? So my one star indicates absolute disappointment.
I'd never see this play before, only the Opera when I was 10 and I didn't remember much of that, not surprisingly.
I'd hesitated a bit over watching this one from the set but as always with Shakespeare I was caught up in it right from the start. I do have a few gripes though. I felt Cressida did just a bit too much wailing when told she must leave Troy and her lover. I don't complain much, as someone else has on this list that they were wearing the wrong clothes etc or that the fighting scenes weren't very realistic. I think the director was trying to show the play as it would appear in Shakespeare's time so it's fine that the clothes are contemporary rather than Ancient Greek (did people of Shakespeare's time know what Ancient Greeks wore?) and we couldn't expect the actors to do lengthy realistic duels. But yes, the duel between Ajax and Hector was unconvincingly coy. Did Achilles really not kill Hector himself but have Hector set upon and murdered by his followers and then profess to having done the killing himself? What exactly happened to Troilus's rival for Cressida or did I somehow fall asleep at the moment whatever happened? And finally, why oh why wasn't Achilles' death included, that so very famous sequence when Paris shoots him with an arrow in the one place he's vulnerable? This is why I ask if the play's unfinished - there's no revenge shown for Hector's death and wouldn't Shakespeare have wanted to include this famous sequence as a fitting finale? But perhaps I can be convinced that Shakespeare's ending is right, that it
I was impressed by all the actors, especially Bernard Whitrow as Ulysses and Charles Gray as Pandarus.
I'd hesitated a bit over watching this one from the set but as always with Shakespeare I was caught up in it right from the start. I do have a few gripes though. I felt Cressida did just a bit too much wailing when told she must leave Troy and her lover. I don't complain much, as someone else has on this list that they were wearing the wrong clothes etc or that the fighting scenes weren't very realistic. I think the director was trying to show the play as it would appear in Shakespeare's time so it's fine that the clothes are contemporary rather than Ancient Greek (did people of Shakespeare's time know what Ancient Greeks wore?) and we couldn't expect the actors to do lengthy realistic duels. But yes, the duel between Ajax and Hector was unconvincingly coy. Did Achilles really not kill Hector himself but have Hector set upon and murdered by his followers and then profess to having done the killing himself? What exactly happened to Troilus's rival for Cressida or did I somehow fall asleep at the moment whatever happened? And finally, why oh why wasn't Achilles' death included, that so very famous sequence when Paris shoots him with an arrow in the one place he's vulnerable? This is why I ask if the play's unfinished - there's no revenge shown for Hector's death and wouldn't Shakespeare have wanted to include this famous sequence as a fitting finale? But perhaps I can be convinced that Shakespeare's ending is right, that it
I was impressed by all the actors, especially Bernard Whitrow as Ulysses and Charles Gray as Pandarus.