ialex_george
Joined Jun 2022
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews5
ialex_george's rating
The latest film featuring Prabhas attempts to weave a grand narrative, traversing from the ancient Mahabharata era to the year 2898. This ambitious timeline could have been an extraordinary journey, but unfortunately, it falls flat due to its lack of coherent storytelling and context.
The movie opens with scenes reminiscent of the Mahabharata, a period steeped in myth and legend. The visuals are grand, and there is a momentary sense of awe. However, as the narrative leaps forward into the distant future, the story loses its grip on the audience. The transition from the epic battles and philosophical musings of the Mahabharata to a futuristic world set in 2898 is abrupt and jarring. There is no effort made to bridge these vastly different timelines or to provide any context for how humanity evolved over the millennia.
One of the film's most glaring flaws is its failure to establish key elements of its world-building. The concept of the "Motherworld" is introduced without any background or explanation. We are left to wonder about its origins and significance. This lack of context is a recurring issue throughout the movie. The audience is expected to accept the existence of this pivotal location without any understanding of its creation or role in the narrative.
The film also introduces a massive energy source, depicted as a triangular building named "The Complex." This structure is clearly meant to be a cornerstone of the futuristic world, yet there is no attempt to explain its purpose, how it was built, or the science behind it. The audience is left in the dark, struggling to comprehend the significance of this mysterious building. Without a foundational understanding of "The Complex," its presence in the film feels arbitrary and disconnected from the overall plot.
Additionally, the advanced technology developed by both the Motherworld and the rebels remains shrouded in mystery. The film fails to provide any insight into how such sophisticated technology came to be. There are no explanations or depictions of the scientific advancements or the processes behind the creation of these technologies. This omission leaves a significant gap in the narrative, making it difficult for the audience to fully immerse themselves in the futuristic setting.
The first half of the movie is particularly problematic. Prabhas's attempts at comedy fall flat, feeling forced and out of sync with the rest of the film. His character lacks the charm and timing needed to make the humor work, resulting in awkward and unengaging scenes. The comedic moments disrupt the narrative flow and fail to provide the relief they are intended to offer.
Amitabh Bachchan's performance is one of the few redeeming aspects of the film. His portrayal is natural and compelling, showcasing his vast experience and talent. However, even Bachchan's acting cannot salvage the movie from its fundamental flaws. The supporting cast, aside from Bachchan, delivers performances that lack depth and authenticity. Their characters are underdeveloped, and their interactions feel contrived.
The movie's special effects and visual design, while impressive at times, cannot compensate for the lack of a cohesive storyline. The futuristic settings and advanced technology are visually appealing, but without a strong narrative foundation, they serve as little more than eye candy. The film's creators seem to have invested heavily in aesthetics while neglecting the essential task of storytelling.
In conclusion, this film is a disappointing misfire. Its ambitious attempt to merge ancient myth with a futuristic vision is undermined by a lack of coherent narrative and context. The leap from the Mahabharata to 2898 is made without any explanation or development, leaving the audience confused and disengaged. Key elements like the "Motherworld" and "The Complex" are introduced without background or purpose, further alienating viewers. The development of advanced technology by both the Motherworld and the rebels remains unexplained, adding to the confusion. Prabhas's comedic efforts are out of place, and aside from Amitabh Bachchan, the acting is subpar. Despite its visual appeal, the movie fails to justify the investment of your time and money. If you're looking for a well-rounded cinematic experience, this one is best avoided.
The movie opens with scenes reminiscent of the Mahabharata, a period steeped in myth and legend. The visuals are grand, and there is a momentary sense of awe. However, as the narrative leaps forward into the distant future, the story loses its grip on the audience. The transition from the epic battles and philosophical musings of the Mahabharata to a futuristic world set in 2898 is abrupt and jarring. There is no effort made to bridge these vastly different timelines or to provide any context for how humanity evolved over the millennia.
One of the film's most glaring flaws is its failure to establish key elements of its world-building. The concept of the "Motherworld" is introduced without any background or explanation. We are left to wonder about its origins and significance. This lack of context is a recurring issue throughout the movie. The audience is expected to accept the existence of this pivotal location without any understanding of its creation or role in the narrative.
The film also introduces a massive energy source, depicted as a triangular building named "The Complex." This structure is clearly meant to be a cornerstone of the futuristic world, yet there is no attempt to explain its purpose, how it was built, or the science behind it. The audience is left in the dark, struggling to comprehend the significance of this mysterious building. Without a foundational understanding of "The Complex," its presence in the film feels arbitrary and disconnected from the overall plot.
Additionally, the advanced technology developed by both the Motherworld and the rebels remains shrouded in mystery. The film fails to provide any insight into how such sophisticated technology came to be. There are no explanations or depictions of the scientific advancements or the processes behind the creation of these technologies. This omission leaves a significant gap in the narrative, making it difficult for the audience to fully immerse themselves in the futuristic setting.
The first half of the movie is particularly problematic. Prabhas's attempts at comedy fall flat, feeling forced and out of sync with the rest of the film. His character lacks the charm and timing needed to make the humor work, resulting in awkward and unengaging scenes. The comedic moments disrupt the narrative flow and fail to provide the relief they are intended to offer.
Amitabh Bachchan's performance is one of the few redeeming aspects of the film. His portrayal is natural and compelling, showcasing his vast experience and talent. However, even Bachchan's acting cannot salvage the movie from its fundamental flaws. The supporting cast, aside from Bachchan, delivers performances that lack depth and authenticity. Their characters are underdeveloped, and their interactions feel contrived.
The movie's special effects and visual design, while impressive at times, cannot compensate for the lack of a cohesive storyline. The futuristic settings and advanced technology are visually appealing, but without a strong narrative foundation, they serve as little more than eye candy. The film's creators seem to have invested heavily in aesthetics while neglecting the essential task of storytelling.
In conclusion, this film is a disappointing misfire. Its ambitious attempt to merge ancient myth with a futuristic vision is undermined by a lack of coherent narrative and context. The leap from the Mahabharata to 2898 is made without any explanation or development, leaving the audience confused and disengaged. Key elements like the "Motherworld" and "The Complex" are introduced without background or purpose, further alienating viewers. The development of advanced technology by both the Motherworld and the rebels remains unexplained, adding to the confusion. Prabhas's comedic efforts are out of place, and aside from Amitabh Bachchan, the acting is subpar. Despite its visual appeal, the movie fails to justify the investment of your time and money. If you're looking for a well-rounded cinematic experience, this one is best avoided.
Rating: 2.5/5
"Interceptor" presents a promising premise, with Alexander Kessel's meticulous planning over six years to carry out an operation. However, the movie fails to deliver on its potential, particularly in portraying the challenge of accessing the command center. It's frustratingly absurd that Kessel is unable to find a way in, leaving viewers wanting more.
While the film doesn't offer anything particularly new or groundbreaking, it could have been salvaged with stronger direction. The storyline lacks the necessary dramatic elements and fails to bring forth the much-needed tension. It would have greatly benefited from heightened stakes and challenges for Alexander to overcome in his quest to infiltrate the command center.
The standout performance in "Interceptor" comes from Captain JJ, who manages to shine amidst the movie's shortcomings. However, even she could have been further improved, especially in her portrayal of emotional scenes. With some minor adjustments, her character could have been more engaging and impactful.
The ending of "Interceptor" takes an unexpected turn as the antagonist gets shot by his own people, rather than the protagonist. This twist leaves viewers puzzled, as the reasoning behind this development is left unexplained. The lack of clarity regarding the antagonist's demise adds to the overall dissatisfaction with the film.
Ultimately, "Interceptor" misses the mark with its underdeveloped plot and lackluster execution. Despite the potential for a gripping and suspenseful narrative, the film falls short in delivering a memorable experience.
"Interceptor" presents a promising premise, with Alexander Kessel's meticulous planning over six years to carry out an operation. However, the movie fails to deliver on its potential, particularly in portraying the challenge of accessing the command center. It's frustratingly absurd that Kessel is unable to find a way in, leaving viewers wanting more.
While the film doesn't offer anything particularly new or groundbreaking, it could have been salvaged with stronger direction. The storyline lacks the necessary dramatic elements and fails to bring forth the much-needed tension. It would have greatly benefited from heightened stakes and challenges for Alexander to overcome in his quest to infiltrate the command center.
The standout performance in "Interceptor" comes from Captain JJ, who manages to shine amidst the movie's shortcomings. However, even she could have been further improved, especially in her portrayal of emotional scenes. With some minor adjustments, her character could have been more engaging and impactful.
The ending of "Interceptor" takes an unexpected turn as the antagonist gets shot by his own people, rather than the protagonist. This twist leaves viewers puzzled, as the reasoning behind this development is left unexplained. The lack of clarity regarding the antagonist's demise adds to the overall dissatisfaction with the film.
Ultimately, "Interceptor" misses the mark with its underdeveloped plot and lackluster execution. Despite the potential for a gripping and suspenseful narrative, the film falls short in delivering a memorable experience.
Rating: 2.5/5 stars
"The Mother" attempts to deliver a fast-paced action experience, but unfortunately, it falls short of bringing anything new to the table. While the film does showcase some well-shot and engaging action sequences at the beginning, it fails to deliver in terms of character development and emotional depth.
From the start, it becomes apparent that "The Mother" prioritizes action over substance. While the action sequences may be visually appealing, they lack originality and fail to offer any fresh ideas or innovative choreography. The film becomes a predictable series of adrenaline-fueled moments, with little to surprise or captivate the audience.
One of the major shortcomings of "The Mother" is the lack of character development. The characters feel one-dimensional and fail to evoke any real emotional connection from the audience. The film misses an opportunity to explore the complex relationships, internal conflicts, and personal growth that could have added depth to the story. By neglecting these elements, the film becomes superficial, leaving viewers with a sense of disappointment.
Furthermore, the final fight scene is marred by a questionable decision made by the villain. It feels contrived and unrealistic when the antagonist fails to take an easy shot, expecting a moment of vulnerability from the protagonist. This lapse in logic takes away from the overall credibility of the film and leaves the audience scratching their heads.
Overall, "The Mother" falls into the realm of mediocrity. While it starts off with well-executed action sequences, it fails to offer anything substantial in terms of storytelling or character development. The lack of emotional depth and conflict limits the film's potential to truly engage and resonate with the audience.
"The Mother" may provide some fleeting entertainment for action enthusiasts who are solely seeking adrenaline-pumping sequences. However, for those looking for a more compelling and thought-provoking cinematic experience, this film may leave them feeling disappointed and unsatisfied.
"The Mother" attempts to deliver a fast-paced action experience, but unfortunately, it falls short of bringing anything new to the table. While the film does showcase some well-shot and engaging action sequences at the beginning, it fails to deliver in terms of character development and emotional depth.
From the start, it becomes apparent that "The Mother" prioritizes action over substance. While the action sequences may be visually appealing, they lack originality and fail to offer any fresh ideas or innovative choreography. The film becomes a predictable series of adrenaline-fueled moments, with little to surprise or captivate the audience.
One of the major shortcomings of "The Mother" is the lack of character development. The characters feel one-dimensional and fail to evoke any real emotional connection from the audience. The film misses an opportunity to explore the complex relationships, internal conflicts, and personal growth that could have added depth to the story. By neglecting these elements, the film becomes superficial, leaving viewers with a sense of disappointment.
Furthermore, the final fight scene is marred by a questionable decision made by the villain. It feels contrived and unrealistic when the antagonist fails to take an easy shot, expecting a moment of vulnerability from the protagonist. This lapse in logic takes away from the overall credibility of the film and leaves the audience scratching their heads.
Overall, "The Mother" falls into the realm of mediocrity. While it starts off with well-executed action sequences, it fails to offer anything substantial in terms of storytelling or character development. The lack of emotional depth and conflict limits the film's potential to truly engage and resonate with the audience.
"The Mother" may provide some fleeting entertainment for action enthusiasts who are solely seeking adrenaline-pumping sequences. However, for those looking for a more compelling and thought-provoking cinematic experience, this film may leave them feeling disappointed and unsatisfied.