ZOMBlE

To simply call this pretentious mess "vile" is an understatement, and to call Vincent Gallo a "filmmaker" is ludicrous. This is without doubt the most unforgivable and narcissistic drive-forever-and-go-nowhere/home porno movie ever conceived, and Gallo's parents must be ashamed of themselves. I feel sympathy and disgust that Chloe Sevigny would allow herself to stoop so low (pun intended) without an ounce of self-respect for herself or for the viewer. Gallo's -- and Sevigny's excuse, calling this an "art" film is utter rubbish. Brown Lump -- er, Brown Bunny is little more than an excuse for Gallo to point the camera at himself for what seems like hours on end, until time comes to lower it to his genitals, so Chloe can perform an impressive Linda Lovelace imitation.

As to the pathetic cretins who seem to enjoy this kind of garbage, what can I say, to each his own; even if it's watching narcissistic racists (read Gallo's personal website where he tried to sell his sperm; look for "not interested in women with dark skin," and "free insemination for women with Aerian features whose fathers fought for Germany in WWII". If this's your idea of great cinema, then the dead truly do walk the earth...

This is not a zombie film, it's a Lucio Fulci film. Fulci will be remembered with the likes of Ed Wood as a truly inept filmmaker, but at least Ed Wood THOUGHT he was making original and compelling movies, and although ridiculous, Wood's ideas were mostly his own. Fulci's game was to rip-off plot lines, and release his films as "Part 2," so imbeciles would believe they were watching sequels. In Italy, "Dawn of the Dead" was titled Zombie, so Fulci's Zombie was released as "Zombie 2". He did likewise with other films, but I personally believe Zombie was his most blatant rip-off. It's not impossible to make a fresh and original zombie movie without resulting to plagiarism.