Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews2
agm-44038's rating
I'm unsure what the producers want to leave us with. We're told about the two main narrators current endeavors. In 2022 there were no criminal allegation against army hammer. But the way it ended made me feel like this was just a salacious attack and maybe not a true documentary. Some might say that a documentary can be opened because the story remains to be unfolded.
Overall, the protagonist do a good job of telling the stories, and it's interesting to see how social media was such a big proponent and getting the story told. However, again it could use, perhaps less social media likes and more in-depth reporting..
Overall, the protagonist do a good job of telling the stories, and it's interesting to see how social media was such a big proponent and getting the story told. However, again it could use, perhaps less social media likes and more in-depth reporting..
The ending of this documentary kind of seems to support the Warren Jeffs faction! The documentarian began this project, wanting to know about lost boys and ended up falling in love with everyone he meets. So, I don't think it's a unbiased account. It really does seem to turn away from the Warren Jeffs of it all. It does seem sad that people were evicted from their places of business and homes, and it is curious as to why the trust board couldn't work with the people currently living there to try to come to an agreement they could all live with. The title alone seems to focus on the ideology that being sweet is an OK thing and doesn't focus on the restrictions and abuse that people injured in the sector. There is mention of it, there is illusions to it, but I think the documentarian could've been a bit better about really truly showing the dark secrets?