Esme_R

In contrast, the movie failed to evoke the same emotional response as the original. I believe this movie was unnecessary and hope that the production of a second movie and its book adaptation is not planned. It almost felt like a cheap version of the original. The music on the original was also catchy; it felt more natural. I had to skip some parts that I considered boring. I definitely do not recommend watching this adaptation and just stick to the original version. Plus, you can change the language to English. I didn't see the need for this remake. Maybe it could've worked if the remake was 5 years from now.

If you seek a well-written review, I recommend Kkaterhyne's. Their critique closely aligns with my personal experience of the movie. I highly recommend reading the book, as it is significantly superior to the film adaptation. Why alter the original story for the movie? The ending failed to evoke the same emotional impact as the book. In the book, Michael served as her therapist, possessing the ability to manipulate her. Where is his brother? The portrayal of Nick's mother felt forced and lacked authenticity. While the passionate scenes were present, they lacked emotional resonance. I cannot pinpoint the exact reason, but it almost felt as though I was watching a different movie, one that lacked the familiarity and charm of the original. The music in this adaptation also deviated from the original, contributing to the sense of disconnection. The first movie was a resounding success and garnered immense popularity, while this one feels like a low-budget production.