CihanVercan
Joined Jul 2008
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings2.4K
CihanVercan's rating
Reviews140
CihanVercan's rating
This is an out-of-the-blue surprise bag kind of never guessable what happens next movie. It follows certain Eastern Film Story Restructuring/Directing trends of the 2000-2010 era. Events told in chronological A to Z order, but lived in EMOTIONAL ORDER* in I'm a Cyborg But That's OK.
Story Restructuring involves hero v nemesis gathering pioneered by Basic Instinct(1992) and Matrix(1999) on silverscreen, and The Baby Blue Movie(1972-TV) on TV, as well as Chrono Trigger(1995-RGP gaming Nintendo) on Console Gaming. The romantic hero v nemesis structure in I'm a Cyborg But That's OK is identical with HOUSE OF FOOLS** by Andrei Konchalovsky.
...recalled and altered with lies. Suppose you have a memory which you involved but forgotten how. In order to make this memory of yours last, you have to recall it and alter it with a lie.
If you can't lie to yourself, then you can't lie to anybody else either. And that anybody becomes your nemesis by helping you fake your past memory, just how it was in Matrix between Neo and Trinity.
-------------- * Emotional Order in sci-fi genre is built up finding out what is the least important and what is the most important Feeling. In Wachowski Brothers' Matrix-1999 this order went from the most important to the least, for Neo swallowing the Red or Blue pill was more important than returning to reality in the end. This way the storyteller(Neo's mind) does not tell the events occurrences in chronological order.
** House Of Fools(2002)by Andrei Konchalovsky is one-level higher emotional and one-level higher mind-blurring than I'm a Cyborg But That's OK. Both of the films are structurized from the Female Heroine's Point Of View of events what has happened in the past and what will happen in the future. Also in both of the films the female heroines do not live in the present because of their worries about future and confusions about past. So what do both Konchalovsky and Park Chan-wook and Wachowski brothers do?
They save both of the asylum girls and Neo, by sending an unreal or non-logical or non-existent nemesises into the heroines' love stories.
Story Restructuring involves hero v nemesis gathering pioneered by Basic Instinct(1992) and Matrix(1999) on silverscreen, and The Baby Blue Movie(1972-TV) on TV, as well as Chrono Trigger(1995-RGP gaming Nintendo) on Console Gaming. The romantic hero v nemesis structure in I'm a Cyborg But That's OK is identical with HOUSE OF FOOLS** by Andrei Konchalovsky.
...recalled and altered with lies. Suppose you have a memory which you involved but forgotten how. In order to make this memory of yours last, you have to recall it and alter it with a lie.
If you can't lie to yourself, then you can't lie to anybody else either. And that anybody becomes your nemesis by helping you fake your past memory, just how it was in Matrix between Neo and Trinity.
-------------- * Emotional Order in sci-fi genre is built up finding out what is the least important and what is the most important Feeling. In Wachowski Brothers' Matrix-1999 this order went from the most important to the least, for Neo swallowing the Red or Blue pill was more important than returning to reality in the end. This way the storyteller(Neo's mind) does not tell the events occurrences in chronological order.
** House Of Fools(2002)by Andrei Konchalovsky is one-level higher emotional and one-level higher mind-blurring than I'm a Cyborg But That's OK. Both of the films are structurized from the Female Heroine's Point Of View of events what has happened in the past and what will happen in the future. Also in both of the films the female heroines do not live in the present because of their worries about future and confusions about past. So what do both Konchalovsky and Park Chan-wook and Wachowski brothers do?
They save both of the asylum girls and Neo, by sending an unreal or non-logical or non-existent nemesises into the heroines' love stories.
Watchers Guide to Understand Anora. No spoils:
* Anora is a paid hooker and arguably the highest paid hooker ever to hit Silverscreen above her role descendants from Taxi Driver(Jodie Foster), Pretty Woman(Julia Roberts), Leaving Las Vegas(Elisabeth Shue) etc.
* Anora is nothing less in pride and ego, although what she does for a living is not an honourable thing to do, compared to her role descendants starred in True Romance(Patricia Arquette), Natural Born Killers(Juliette Lewis), Freeway(Reese Witherspoon) and Monster(Charlize Theron). Anora is 5th in this order by the loveliness and relatability to those starlets during their heyday.
* Ask yourself every scene and every beat WHAT WOULD I DO IF I WERE ANORA AT THIS SITUATION... Patricia Arquette did it best in True Romance. But consider 32 years passed since Tarantino shot the True Romance.
After 32 years, what romance turned into from true and genuine:
False and fake in taste. This is where her painful screams are rising from after getting beaten by her playboy boyfriend's father's bodyguards.
Anora is not a romantic movie but an erotic movie. So was Animal Instincts. But Shannon Whirry did not showcase any pride or ego to relate with her audience. Anora did.
That's why, from a production quality perspective, Anora is more than her erotic talent. This starlet also showcased a dramatic relatability and receives an humanistic caring just like Reese Witherspoon in Freeway and Charlize Theron in Monster.
* Anora is a paid hooker and arguably the highest paid hooker ever to hit Silverscreen above her role descendants from Taxi Driver(Jodie Foster), Pretty Woman(Julia Roberts), Leaving Las Vegas(Elisabeth Shue) etc.
* Anora is nothing less in pride and ego, although what she does for a living is not an honourable thing to do, compared to her role descendants starred in True Romance(Patricia Arquette), Natural Born Killers(Juliette Lewis), Freeway(Reese Witherspoon) and Monster(Charlize Theron). Anora is 5th in this order by the loveliness and relatability to those starlets during their heyday.
* Ask yourself every scene and every beat WHAT WOULD I DO IF I WERE ANORA AT THIS SITUATION... Patricia Arquette did it best in True Romance. But consider 32 years passed since Tarantino shot the True Romance.
After 32 years, what romance turned into from true and genuine:
False and fake in taste. This is where her painful screams are rising from after getting beaten by her playboy boyfriend's father's bodyguards.
Anora is not a romantic movie but an erotic movie. So was Animal Instincts. But Shannon Whirry did not showcase any pride or ego to relate with her audience. Anora did.
That's why, from a production quality perspective, Anora is more than her erotic talent. This starlet also showcased a dramatic relatability and receives an humanistic caring just like Reese Witherspoon in Freeway and Charlize Theron in Monster.
What married couples know 'bout the unknowingness of the single couples is this:
Stereotypically speaking character arcs, whether kids show or adult show, do not do the same things in a show, unless its the 1970s and we are watching The Love Boat, which I could never complete a full episode from beginning to end, reading its script or watching it from the producers' library.
Chipmunks Valentine Special has taught me many facts about the "plot vs relationship" issue on any modern day 2025 romance titles.
Comedy and Romance by themselves, are not basic film/story genres.
Comedy, to me, as a videographer, is a sprinkle. Comedy cannot construct a movie of its own, accordingly it is not a genre. But it is the best spice which any type of film/story might need.
Romance, to Janice and Ross, and learnt from them, to me, is a TITLE.
When a storyteller pitches me a romance story. I don't think of its mood, genre, or style. The only thing a romance storyteller must pitch, is the TITLE. Romance itself is the title.
So, Alvin has a dark-side in this episode. Like Anakin Skywalker archetype. Or the DON DIEGO DE LA VEGA archetype.
"Anakin Skywalker vs Don Diego De La Vega" makes a story for Alvin and Brittany.
Anakin, who causes the death of his beloved ones, his mother, his wife and finally himself. He loved himself more than all, but he causes the death of his-self due to his Narcissism.
Don Diego De La Vega, a developed Batman or Hulk, a Bruce Wayne or Bruce Banner, in a stretched character arc build-up way, must choose between his sweetheart lover girl or his local political family future.
Dark side of a good-hearted hero who commits evil deeds unwillingly, as simple as it gets, display a POND REFLECTION SCENE - the actual historical moment when. Greek prince Narcissus fall in love with his evil reflection on the river water, right before the water was washed up - gives the motivation to Alvin to get back to Brittany by quitting being the top romancer of the world.
Any romance title made to be released in 2025 or beyond, which does not have any of these merits Janice and Ross initiated and I counted above, will lose big time, in blockbustering the gross revenues.
I want to see a dark-side in every Alvin romancer (whether the female or male counterpart) why do you think audiences opt for teen Anakin and Padme's puppyhood times, when picking the top 10 romance couples of all time? This is the answer above.
I want to see a wild-rose in every Brittany counterpart (whether the male or the female counterpart) why do you think growing up girls and boys still today in 2025 love to find an ELLE WOODS or Hepburn's SABRINA? A&B type of couples are the most dynamic of all. A romance couple sharing a love box full of Tri. Nitro. Toluen, as if Road Runner falls in love with her Coyote...
- When you are single and in love, the repetition of special day memories give negative impact to your romance
Stereotypically speaking character arcs, whether kids show or adult show, do not do the same things in a show, unless its the 1970s and we are watching The Love Boat, which I could never complete a full episode from beginning to end, reading its script or watching it from the producers' library.
Chipmunks Valentine Special has taught me many facts about the "plot vs relationship" issue on any modern day 2025 romance titles.
Comedy and Romance by themselves, are not basic film/story genres.
Comedy, to me, as a videographer, is a sprinkle. Comedy cannot construct a movie of its own, accordingly it is not a genre. But it is the best spice which any type of film/story might need.
Romance, to Janice and Ross, and learnt from them, to me, is a TITLE.
When a storyteller pitches me a romance story. I don't think of its mood, genre, or style. The only thing a romance storyteller must pitch, is the TITLE. Romance itself is the title.
So, Alvin has a dark-side in this episode. Like Anakin Skywalker archetype. Or the DON DIEGO DE LA VEGA archetype.
"Anakin Skywalker vs Don Diego De La Vega" makes a story for Alvin and Brittany.
Anakin, who causes the death of his beloved ones, his mother, his wife and finally himself. He loved himself more than all, but he causes the death of his-self due to his Narcissism.
Don Diego De La Vega, a developed Batman or Hulk, a Bruce Wayne or Bruce Banner, in a stretched character arc build-up way, must choose between his sweetheart lover girl or his local political family future.
Dark side of a good-hearted hero who commits evil deeds unwillingly, as simple as it gets, display a POND REFLECTION SCENE - the actual historical moment when. Greek prince Narcissus fall in love with his evil reflection on the river water, right before the water was washed up - gives the motivation to Alvin to get back to Brittany by quitting being the top romancer of the world.
Any romance title made to be released in 2025 or beyond, which does not have any of these merits Janice and Ross initiated and I counted above, will lose big time, in blockbustering the gross revenues.
I want to see a dark-side in every Alvin romancer (whether the female or male counterpart) why do you think audiences opt for teen Anakin and Padme's puppyhood times, when picking the top 10 romance couples of all time? This is the answer above.
I want to see a wild-rose in every Brittany counterpart (whether the male or the female counterpart) why do you think growing up girls and boys still today in 2025 love to find an ELLE WOODS or Hepburn's SABRINA? A&B type of couples are the most dynamic of all. A romance couple sharing a love box full of Tri. Nitro. Toluen, as if Road Runner falls in love with her Coyote...