becausejamie

Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction (2024)

I wasted time

"Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction" falls short of delivering a compelling and scientifically rigorous exploration of extraterrestrial phenomena. While the show's premise of dissecting real-life encounters with UFOs is intriguing, its execution leaves much to be desired.

Production Quality The production values of "Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction" are subpar, detracting from the viewing experience. The cinematography needs more creativity, often relying on static shots and uninspired reenactments. The editing could be better, failing to maintain a coherent narrative flow throughout each episode. To improve, the show should:

• Invest in higher-quality cameras and lighting equipment
• Employ more dynamic cinematography techniques
• Enhance the visual effects for reenactments
• Improve the pacing through tighter editing

Content and Research The show's approach to investigating UFO encounters is superficial at best. While it claims to use scientific data and research, the depth of analysis needs to be improved. The investigations often feel rushed and incomplete, failing to explore alternative explanations thoroughly. To enhance the content:

• Consult a broader range of experts, including skeptics and debunkers
• Provide more detailed scientific explanations for phenomena
• Allocate more time to each case, allowing for in-depth investigation
• Present a balanced view by including multiple perspectives on each encounter

Cast Performance The show's hosts, Mitch Horowitz and Chrissy Newton, need to bring gravitas and expertise to their roles as UFO investigators. Chrissy Newton needs a more scientific background to conduct credible analyses of extraterrestrial phenomena. To address these issues:

• Replace or supplement the current hosts with individuals who have relevant scientific or investigative backgrounds
• Provide additional training to the hosts in critical thinking and scientific methodology
• Encourage a more skeptical and balanced approach to investigations

Credibility and Objectivity The show's credibility suffers from its tendency to lean towards extraterrestrial explanations without sufficient evidence. This bias undermines determining whether encounters can be explained through conventional means. To improve credibility:

• Implement a more rigorous fact-checking process
• Collaborate with reputable scientific institutions for data analysis and expert opinions

Conclusion "Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction" requires significant improvements to live up to its premise of scientifically investigating UFO encounters. By enhancing production quality, deepening research, improving host expertise, and maintaining a more objective stance, the show could become a valuable contribution to the field of UFO investigation.

The show's approach, particularly that of Chrissy Newton, needs more rigor and credibility to examine extraterrestrial phenomena seriously. Without substantial changes, "Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction" risks perpetuating misinformation rather than shedding light on the complex and fascinating world of UFO encounters.

Alaskan Costal Sasquatch: Area A (2022)

A Promising Premise Marred by Technical Shortcomings

As an avid film enthusiast, I approached "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" with intrigue and anticipation. The subject matter, revolving around the elusive and enigmatic Sasquatch, held the potential for an engaging and thought-provoking cinematic experience. However, despite the captivating premise, the film's production value, particularly in the realm of videography, fell disappointingly short, hindering its overall impact and credibility.

The Allure of the Sasquatch Let's begin by acknowledging the inherent appeal of the Sasquatch phenomenon. The idea of a towering, ape-like creature roaming the remote wilderness has captured the imagination of countless individuals worldwide. The filmmakers deserve credit for tapping into this enduring fascination and attempting to shed light on the enigmatic creature's purported existence in the Alaskan coastal region.

The Paramount Importance of Videography When delving into controversial or enigmatic subjects, the quality of videography becomes paramount. Clear, crisp, and well-framed footage is essential in establishing credibility and allowing viewers to scrutinize the presented evidence objectively. Unfortunately, "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" falls short in this aspect.

The videography in the film is plagued by shaky camerawork, poor framing, and inconsistent lighting, making it challenging to immerse oneself fully in the narrative. Crucial moments that should have been captured with precision and clarity are marred by blurry footage and jarring camera movements, leaving viewers needing help to discern the details.

A Missed Opportunity for Credibility In a genre where evidence and documentation are paramount, the film's technical shortcomings in videography need to be revised to maintain the validity of the presented material. Viewers may question the footage's authenticity, ultimately diminishing the impact of the film's central premise. When dealing with controversial topics, high-quality videography is not merely a matter of aesthetics; it is a crucial factor in establishing credibility and allowing audiences to evaluate the evidence objectively.

Despite its flaws, "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" serves as a reminder of the importance of production value, particularly in the realm of videography, when tackling controversial or enigmatic subjects. The filmmakers' passion for the subject matter is evident, but the technical limitations of their work hinder their efforts.

As a film buff, I implore the creators to invest in improving their craft, honing their skills in videography, and embracing the latest technologies and techniques to capture footage of the highest quality. By addressing these shortcomings, future projects exploring the Sasquatch phenomenon or other controversial topics could achieve professionalism and credibility that resonate with audiences and contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding these enigmatic subjects.

The Shape of Shadows (2023)

A Promising Premise Marred by Technical Shortcomings

I approached "The Shape of Shadows" with an open mind, intrigued by its paranormal subject matter. The premise of exploring the enigmatic realm of shadows and their potential connection to the supernatural held promise, offering an opportunity for a captivating and thought-provoking cinematic experience. However, despite the intriguing concept, the film's execution fell short due to significant technical flaws undermining its overall impact.

Subpar Sound Capture One of the most glaring issues that plagued "The Shape of Shadows" was its poor sound capture. Dialogue often sounded muffled and distorted, making it challenging to fully comprehend the conversations and nuances of the characters' interactions. This issue could have been more problematic during crucial expository scenes, where the audience should have been immersed in the unfolding narrative. Instead, the subpar audio quality was a constant distraction, pulling viewers out of the experience and hampering their ability to engage with the story fully.

Amateurish Videography The film's videography also left much to be desired. The camera work was often shaky and poorly framed, resulting in shots that felt amateurish and lacking in artistic vision. This lack of technical proficiency was particularly evident during the more intense paranormal sequences, where the camera's inability to capture the action effectively diminished the intended sense of tension and suspense. Additionally, the lighting could have been more consistent, with some scenes appearing overexposed while others were shrouded in darkness, making it challenging to discern crucial details.

Missed Opportunities for Atmosphere Given the film's paranormal subject matter, there were ample opportunities to create an atmosphere of dread and unease. However, the filmmakers should have capitalized on these moments, resulting in a lack of genuine tension and suspense. Sound design and visual effects could have been leveraged to heighten the sense of the otherworldly. Still, these elements could have been utilized or executed better, diminishing the film's overall impact.

A Glimmer of Promise Despite the technical shortcomings, there were moments when the film's premise shone through, offering glimpses of its potential. Exploring the paranormal and the concept of shadows harboring otherworldly entities was intriguing. They could have been captivating if presented with more remarkable finesse and attention to detail. The filmmakers' ambition and willingness to tackle such a unique subject matter deserve recognition, demonstrating a desire to push boundaries and explore uncharted territory.

In conclusion, while "The Shape of Shadows" presented an exciting and entertaining premise, its lack of production value and technical proficiency ultimately undermined its validity and impact. As a moviegoer, I implore the creators to learn from this experience and strive for greater technical mastery in their future endeavors. With a firmer grasp of sound capture, videography, and atmospheric storytelling, their next project could truly shine and captivate audiences with its unique vision and exploration of the paranormal.

Expedition Bigfoot (2019)

Fun Show but no science

Hey....do you hear that...it's a show that uses technology to mask the bs (bad science). It's an entertaining show with a script and weird plots, but not something that would lead anyone to believe this Bigfoot exists. Native stories are interesting and it's difficult to trust anyone sharing their experience. Sharing on a tv show doesn't validate nor give credibility to anyone.

In the end, If you need to waste some time give it a whirl.

Hey....do you hear that...it's a show that uses technology to mask the bs (bad science). It's an entertaining show with a script and weird plots, but not something that would lead anyone to believe this Bigfoot exists. Native stories are interesting and it's difficult to trust anyone sharing their experience. Sharing on a tv show doesn't validate nor give credibility to anyone.

In the end, If you need to waste some time give it a whirl.

On the Trail of UFOs: Dark Sky (2021)

Not a deep diver....

Not exactly revealing, nor quality if you've watched Hellier. This docs crew tries but falls short. The story telling struggles in cadence, narrative quality, and it feels aimlessly. Unfortunately this doc doesn't go beyond superficial, but hope they nail the next one.

Phantom Rider (2020)

It tries....

Im sure this documentary style resonates with his fans, but overall the editing and vfx interfere with determining the truth. Their lack of story telling, videography, and tech beings me to the conclusion their podcasters wanting to a buck.

Y: The Last Man (2021)

What a show....

Theres glimpses what to like, but overall its a hot mess. The son is a petulant adult child - great acting- and the daughters (Cheney look a like) coup that develops is predictable. Its a show that is filled with great actors faced with sub par writing. Patience is a must when watching cause its a fast food burrito.

On the Trail of UFOs (2020)

Poor camera work in vital points and..

If your attempting to show proof or be a legitimate investigative documentary you need new material. The film is a vain attempt and doesn't provide substance to what is already well documented. It's a YouTube attempt at the subject.