eiglas2003
Joined May 2006
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews2
eiglas2003's rating
This was the first vehicle in which I remember seeing Jason Isaacs and his treatment of his character left a lasting impression on me. To me, it's a testament to his talent that he could make such an unpleasant individual sympathetic and, at times, vulnerable. As mentioned in an earlier crit, the unusual presentation of a drab and colourless sixties really creates an atmosphere of sordidity and the authentic sets added to this (...don't you just HATE it when you mumble under your breath '..and that wallpaper's wrong for the time too...'). The impressive cast guaranteed excellent performances all round but, for me, Isaacs took the gong. (I was particularly pleased to later discover he is a fellow Scouser!) Dangerous Lady is available on video at Amazon.co.uk. Buy it. It's good.
What is the problem with everyone and this book/film? No-one has a good word to say about either, and I'm puzzled because I enjoyed 'em both! Okay, so they're not great literature - but I personally don't know many people who read Shakespeare in bed at night or go to see filmed stage versions of Hamlet and the like, although I've no problem with those who do. It's horses for courses and we don't all have to like the same things! I would say, I also noticed the arm thing but it was a trivial hiccough in an otherwise beautifully filmed and reasonably acted bit of entertainment. Langdon is an academic, not a special agent and I don't think there necessarily has to be a sexual chemistry between him and Sophie. To me, he came over as what he was; a staid academic thrown into a dangerous situation and trying to deal with it - I'd have been a bit off my best too! I thought the driving scenes were brill (...reminded me of me...) and I have to say Silas' self-chastisement made me physically shudder! Paul Bettany was at once a chilling religious psychopath and a damaged child (...which I feel could have been explained a bit more....). I do, however, feel that viewers who have read the book may enjoy it more than those who did not, as it is quite an involved plot to squeeze into a two hour film. I do normally sit there whispering 'that's not right - look at that - you wouldn't see one of those there...' etc. etc. but the fact that I was able to suspend this irritating trait for two hours tells me it wasn't that bad!